Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:73177
Registered on:1/15/2008
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
good deal. hope LSU can end it here.

re: LSU 11 @ UCF 0 Final - F/7

Posted by beauchristopher on 2/22/26 at 5:25 pm to
i always ask this but forgive me, does anyone know if the 10 run rule is on?
I don't even follow the NBA and thought that trade was absurd. Anthony Davis is often, I just checked now and saw he's still missing games and even on a different team now.
Oregon for me. Especially doing that on the road.

I kind of thought Alabama would beat them as well. Was nice to see Indiana win it all.
Correct. There are often multiple reasons when he does things.
Yorke may be the greatest to ever play the game.

re: Grace Knox

Posted by beauchristopher on 2/19/26 at 11:17 pm to
My favorite current player.
Gymnastics as far as competition goes, but I guess you mean literally head to head at the same time. Not sure that counts then.
quote:

bottled water should be off the list. Tap water is fine.


I've seen this comment in the other threads, but I feel like bottled water should be okay. Especially poor people in potentially really poor quality water areas. This SNAP restriction just opens to door for more future restrictions which is exactly what the majority around here want.

40 bottles of Wal-Mart water is like 5 dollars. A gallon is like a dollar. I think a 12 pack of soda is nearly 9 dollars. You'd think most people would be okay with at least water, but I realize this is the OT.
quote:

Soft drinks: Carbonated, nonalcoholic beverages that contain high-fructose corn syrup or artificial sweeteners.


Interested if Stevia drinks are still covered.
quote:

They're stealing, but the waiter and manager had to have realized what was going on yet continued to bring the food and leave the plates.


I don't follow this. What do you want them to do here? Not serve them and then get labeled racist for assuming what they are doing? That would be worse, no?

Pretty sure you pay after, so how are they suppose to handle this? Go up to them and ask if they are all intending to pay? Stop serving them, because they assume they know what they are going to do?

Maybe this should be a pay before you eat situation. Please correct me if I am wrong here. I just don't understand what they could do here off assumptions without getting some serious negative publicity. Wouldn't they get crap for not serving them or attempting to call them out before giving them the bill? I think Applebees would much rather risk that than risk other allegations.
quote:

She is actually correct if it doesn’t say you can’t share. I agree that it is intuitive but that doesn’t matter.


then why even justify paying for 2 people? in their bs line of thinking why didn't they just argue for 1 to feed everybody. they knew what they were doing is bs.

per person means one person to eat.

i like how at the end the lady losing her mind for no reason used the word, "disrespect."

it's ridiculous how some people look for reasons to lash out like this.
quote:

she knew what she did just thinks getting loud gets you out of anything


this is exactly what i was wondering.

she has to know better. anyone with a functioning brain has to know better. she's just making a fuss.
She literally said it says PER PERSON.

It's not difficult to understand per person. Not per person to share with other people.
Also, there isn't anything to be upset about if you are the opposing team either. If it's ruled an out live then the other team isn't in position to be tagged out at second.

If anything the incorrect ruling could have cost LSU the ability to tag up.

It was the correct call all around.
Why? Because the ump said it wasn't a catch, so he went to 3rd without worrying about it.

Wouldn't it be messed up to rule him out for an umpire error? If the ump made the correct call on the field of out then he wouldn't have been in position to be thrown out at second. He would either stay closer to the bag or tag up.
It's truly not that deep. It doesn't have to be. I guess some people will just never move on or let go. I am sure the daughter loved it until the mother had to teach her to find some sort of offense about it. And then the mayor apologized to the girl for what she "experienced."

It's mardi gras beads around a doll. Duing mardi gras.

Can't wait till they do all white dolls with beads and no beads around the black dolls and then someone complains why can't they get beads with their doll. There is no winning with certain people of this mindset. It's sad. Enjoy the moment. If your child is happy about beads around a doll's neck then it doesn't have to be any deeper than that.
This is actually tiresome. Cannot win. Just can't with some people.

It's mardi gras beads. She needs to grow up and stop being stupid.