Started By
Message

re: How do you feel about passing up Field Goals

Posted on 7/22/26 at 12:49 pm to
Posted by jb21lsu
NWLA
Member since Mar 2018
2897 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

tarzana


quote:

But that was different


Some jokes write themselves.
This post was edited on 7/22/26 at 10:37 pm
Posted by NotaStarGazer
Member since Dec 2023
3134 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

points is points.... Based on my analytics .... 90% of the time it comes back to bite you late in 70% of the games when you're 2 points behind.
Take the points early.

IMO, Kiffin has come back closer to the mainstream in that I don't think he gambles as much as he did a couple of years ago when sometimes he would go for it on his own 35. Ironically, other coaches have met him in the middle by going for it more than they did in the past.

What irritates more than "chasing first downs" is "chasing points." Those are the guys who try to either tie the game early in the 3rd quarter after a TD or try to get within a FG with loads of time left in the game. And more times than not going for 2 and failing leaves you like 4 points behind with 2 minutes to play when kicking the PAT in the 3rd quarter would leave you only a FG behind. Oh, and the SUPPOSED chart that people use to justify that I believe does not have the time left in the game factored in. Just like the chart that has you going for first downs on 4th doesn't consider field position, the opponent's defense, etc.
Posted by Blanding
Magnolia
Member since Aug 2017
89 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:10 pm to
I cringe when I hear "data driven decisions." Like you, I believe it should be, "data informed decisions."
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
55189 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

You never know how valuable those free points maybe later in the game.


Games are higher scoring than they used to be. THAT’S why you need touchdowns. Field goals don’t make as much of an impact in 34-31 games as they used to in 14-10 or 24-21 games
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
72408 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:33 pm to
Take the points early, play the situation late.
Posted by Salviati
Member since Apr 2006
7818 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

quote:

If you can score a TD fifty percent of the time it’s certainly worth it.
What if you can score 3 points 90% of the time?
I can score a TD 50% of the time, or score 3 points 90% of the time?

That's easy. Go for the touchdown.

No question about it.
Posted by SwampTygerSaint
Member since Jul 2026
20 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

If Lane loses some games for us in a similar manner, I could see some criticism from the fan base.


We all know that Lane is an aggressive coach. Why criticize now? Anytime it's 4th and 1 or 4th and 2 inside the 35 he's prolly going.
Posted by 0
Member since Aug 2011
17926 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

How do you feel about passing up Field Goals


In the 1st half i would never pass on points. Outside of very specific situations anyways
Posted by Jabontik
Houston
Member since Dec 2016
4523 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 3:51 pm to
It also depends on who your kicker is. If you got a guy whos nailing 90% of the under 40 FG, then go ahead and take the automatic points. If your kicker is shaky at all, going for it makes alot more sense
Posted by Jauquismos
Member since Jul 2023
1229 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 4:24 pm to
BK had a horrible feel for the game.

I think Lane may have a tad bit better feel for it idk

You have to have a feel for the game and what you think your team can accomplish. Also, circumstances mean something i.e. how did we look on the first 3 downs, did we get stuffed etc...
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57079 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

I tend to be old school in the sense that I think you should almost always kick in the first half (exception being when you are within the 5 yard line). You never know how valuable those free points maybe later in the game. Second half- going for it doesn’t bother me as much.

You are being guided by superstition. Just as you never know how valuable those three points might be, you also don’t know how valuable those extra four points would be.

There is no one answer for each game and situation. A lot depends on how high scoring you expect the game to be. It also depends on what you think the chances are of converting and of making the field goal.

In general, I like the idea of going for it a lot more than coaches used to. If it’s fourth and one at the 50 you should go for it in 2026, and they should have gone for it in 1950. The reason they didn’t is that football coaches are fairly stupid.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
110259 posts
Posted on 7/22/26 at 6:14 pm to
quote:

Analytics should be used as a tool to make a decision, not the decision-maker.

Lane tends to use it as a decision maker. He is pretty extreme when it comes to using analytics to make decisions

Be prepared


I know Lane will go for it a lot and I’m prepared.

I also know the Rant melts will be glorious.
Posted by chalmetteowl
Chalmette
Member since Jan 2008
55189 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

it’s fourth and one at the 50 you should go for it in 2026, and they should have gone for it in 1950.


We not comparing modern playbooks and QB play to what it was in 1950…
Posted by gate4sec4row4
Member since Jul 2026
11 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 4:01 pm to
Kick FG on the opening drive. With a competent offense now, we will have many other chances.

Feel of the game on the others. (I hate saying analytics)
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
57079 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

We not comparing modern playbooks and QB play to what it was in 1950…

I wasn’t comparing any of that. It’s a matter of odds. In 1950 the chances of making a fourth and one are greater than 50%. Therefore a 4th and one at the 50 results in a greater chance of the offensive team getting the ball at the 50 are greater than the chances of giving the defensive team the ball at the 50. And the alternative is a punt and change of possession, which is better for the defensive team. Therefore they should have gone for it.
Posted by JodyPlauche
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2009
10004 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 5:31 pm to
quote:

How do you feel about passing up Field Goals


He will have the LSU Fans FULL SUPPORT until he turns the ball over on downs the 1st time.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
66332 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

2017 (FAU): 39 attempts (Ranked No. 1 nationally)

2018 (FAU): 44 attempts (Ranked No. 1 nationally)

2019 (FAU): 22 attempts (Tied No. 57 nationally)

2020 (Ole Miss): 33 attempts (Ranked No. 3 nationally)

2021 (Ole Miss): 49 attempts (Ranked No. 1 nationally) with a ~63.3% conversion rate

2020–2025 Span (Ole Miss): Converted roughly 62.4% of total fourth-down tries (123 of 197) under his general direction. [1, 2]


Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13901 posts
Posted on 7/23/26 at 7:38 pm to
I'm not a fan of going for two early. It too often seems to bite people in the end.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram