- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dellenger on possible CFP Expansion: There is a coalescing around 24
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:51 pm to PeterMillarEnjoyer
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:51 pm to PeterMillarEnjoyer
Don’t worry it’ll end up being identical to a march madness bracket in college basketball. “We think expanding to a 68 team CFP is best for the game”. Money/greed ruins everything.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:51 pm to SammyTiger
12 is not too many! Are you all saying that if LSU when 10-2 with close losses to teams like UGa or Bama, and we are held out of the playoffs because Notre Dame went 11-1, you wouldn't be pissed?
Face it, it is too hard to get everyone playing similar schedules with so many teams, so the ONLY solution to get all deserving good teams into the playoff is to expand.
The plus-side of that is eventually a team like JMU is going to beat someone or make a run, which would be awesome to see.
Face it, it is too hard to get everyone playing similar schedules with so many teams, so the ONLY solution to get all deserving good teams into the playoff is to expand.
The plus-side of that is eventually a team like JMU is going to beat someone or make a run, which would be awesome to see.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:52 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
24 seems completely and utterly absurd.
It's exactly what FCS has had since 2021
Same number of teams roughly in FCS as in FBS
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 12:54 pm
Posted on 4/21/26 at 12:54 pm to GeauxPanthers2
Everyone's favorite local radio host will love it for sure
Posted on 4/21/26 at 1:01 pm to John Rambeaux
I do agree to a point, but at this point all the other bowl are crap and athletes are opting out if not in the playoffs. This hopefully will make more postseaon bowl games watchable again. And yes, the championship games are pointless now anyway so why do they still play them?
Posted on 4/21/26 at 1:03 pm to PeterMillarEnjoyer
They’re trying to make both the season and post season meaningless
Posted on 4/21/26 at 1:09 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
You either have to let all conferences champs in, including the CUSA champ, or invite the 8th place team in the SEC/B1G, or both.
I would rather let in all of the mid major conference champions than the 4th place SEC/Big 10 teams, but that’s just me.
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 4/21/26 at 1:11 pm to PeterMillarEnjoyer
16, no byes, 8, 4, 2, 1.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 1:17 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
You either have to let all conferences champs in, including the CUSA champ, or invite the 8th place team in the SEC/B1G, or both.
I think if they talk further expansion, then this should end conference championship games. Toward the end of the season, players are already beat up, higher risk for injury and having to play several more games??
Posted on 4/21/26 at 1:17 pm to PeterMillarEnjoyer
12 teams is already too many. They are determined to ruin college football to the point the NFL becomes a better product. fricking shame
Posted on 4/21/26 at 1:21 pm to tiger109
quote:Agree even though it should have never gone past 8. 8 was the sweet spot IMO and they past it. Greedy fux.
16, no byes, 8, 4, 2, 1.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 1:24 pm to PeterMillarEnjoyer
quote:
the postseason should expand to 24 teams.

Posted on 4/21/26 at 1:25 pm to PeterMillarEnjoyer
The 4 team playoff was the perfect format, and I will die on this hill
Posted on 4/21/26 at 1:44 pm to Alt26
No one is concerned about the long term, just trying to increase the TV deals for now until the bubble inevitably pops
24 teams is dumb but since the bowls have been reduced to exhibitions no one cares about anymore, ESPN needs to fill that hole so expansion is inevitable
24 teams is dumb but since the bowls have been reduced to exhibitions no one cares about anymore, ESPN needs to fill that hole so expansion is inevitable
Posted on 4/21/26 at 1:48 pm to BilJ
Yay so we will get more James Madison and Tulane like 1st round blowout games
Posted on 4/21/26 at 1:49 pm to PeterMillarEnjoyer
Don't they have better things to do?
Posted on 4/21/26 at 1:49 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
It's exactly what FCS has had since 2021
another reason why no one watches FCS
Posted on 4/21/26 at 2:11 pm to PeterMillarEnjoyer
24 is incredibly stupid and totally based on the Benjamins and a money grab.
There aren't 24 teams capable of winning a title. The lower seeded teams, including G5 programs, are just going to be fodder for the top shelf teams. This isn't basketball or baseball where a lower seed can "make a run".
Once again, the B1G's Petitti drags his nut sack across Sankey's chin.
There aren't 24 teams capable of winning a title. The lower seeded teams, including G5 programs, are just going to be fodder for the top shelf teams. This isn't basketball or baseball where a lower seed can "make a run".
Once again, the B1G's Petitti drags his nut sack across Sankey's chin.
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 9:04 pm
Posted on 4/21/26 at 2:19 pm to PeterMillarEnjoyer
Why the frick can't it just be a number that would eliminate Bye's? The expanded playoff has been good outside of the fact that the Bye's suck.
Posted on 4/21/26 at 2:23 pm to PeterMillarEnjoyer
Tbh a final cfp number i could see being good for college football is 32. Seed them and everyone plays first round. 5 weekends of playoffs would be cool. Yes a 32 could beat a 1 or a 30 beat a 3. Yes having more teams in the cfp reduces the amount of top shelf talent only going to those blue bloods schools and more 4/5 stars to other schools. Balance.
However realistically speaking i think 16 would be a good number.
However realistically speaking i think 16 would be a good number.
This post was edited on 4/21/26 at 2:26 pm
Popular
Back to top



0


