- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wedding videography company denies refund after man’s fiancee dies, taunts him on website
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:14 am to Big_Slim
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:14 am to Big_Slim
quote:
83 upvotes and counting for a guy that wants a company to be sued because they said some mean words.
Ladies and gentleman, the free speech warriors of the OT!
Sorry for wanting this shithead to get his comeuppance
1
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:16 am to REG861
quote:
The guy running the videography company is career scam artist
I did read it an saw that. That has nothing to do with this situation, though. Take emotions out and lay out the facts.
A contractor was signed and agreed upon
The company denies his claim for a refund based on the contract (take the moral argument out of it)
The fiance harrases and starts a smear campaign against the company over the refund he isn't legally entitled to
The video company in turn harrases the guy back
They are both in the wrong
I am not saying morally the company maybe shouldn't have given him the refund FWIW but I am saying it's their right granted to them based on what was previously agreed upon and the guy should have accepted that instead of escalating the situation.
Crying to social media and the news is now the default everyone does and it creates this expectancy that we can bully businesses into reversing their policy we originally agreed to by being a consumer. It's silly.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:18 am to FAP SAM
I agree he absolutely should. Just not with the mechanism of the court system provided he didn’t violate the contract through any of his actions.
Guy’s a sack of shite and should (and probably will) go bankrupt, but it should also absolutely be because of free market fallout.
Guy’s a sack of shite and should (and probably will) go bankrupt, but it should also absolutely be because of free market fallout.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:19 am to stout
quote:
They are both in the wrong
like someone else in this thread said, the fiance's reaction was like a 2/10 on the wrong scale considering the circumstances
the company's reaction was a 10/10 on the wrong scale
quote:
the guy should have accepted that instead of escalating the situation.
knowing the owner's history, I'm going to assume the fiance's reaction wasn't just purely off not getting a refund, but probably had more issues with the company the entire time
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:21 am to Salmon
quote:
I'm going to assume the fiance's reaction wasn't just purely off not getting a refund, but probably had more issues with the company the entire time
You can assume antyhing you choose. That doesn't change the facts we know and I posted. Also, your assumptions are going to be guided by emotions.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:23 am to FAP SAM
quote:
I understand their argument, until they start making fun of the dude. frick them, I hope he sues them for his money back and emotional pain and suffering
Yeah. Had they stayed professional about it, nobody would really take much issue with it. They ultimately earned all the bullshite they are finna receive.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:24 am to Big_Slim
quote:
I agree he absolutely should. Just not with the mechanism of the court system provided he didn’t violate the contract through any of his actions.
Considering he had no intention of honoring their contract as evidenced by his lengthy history of fraud, I’d say they have a cause of action against him . Not to mention the wire fraud charges he’s going to get hit with
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:25 am to Big_Slim
quote:
I agree he absolutely should. Just not with the mechanism of the court system provided he didn’t violate the contract through any of his actions.
Guy’s a sack of shite and should (and probably will) go bankrupt, but it should also absolutely be because of free market fallout.
I generally agree with all of this. That said, I'm sure attorneys are looking for ways for him to go after the company for online harassment.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:27 am to Big_Slim
quote:
83 upvotes and counting for a guy that wants a company to be sued because they said some mean words.
Ladies and gentleman, the free speech warriors of the OT!
Your comprehension of the First Amendment is comically deficient.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:27 am to northshorebamaman
quote:
“Today would have been the day where we would have filmed Justin and Alexis’ wedding. After what Justin pulled with the media stunt to try and shake us down for a refund we hope you sob and cry all day for what would have been your wedding day,”
Are they trying to ruin their business?
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:27 am to Salmon
quote:
like someone else in this thread said, the fiance's reaction was like a 2/10 on the wrong scale considering the circumstances
the company's reaction was a 10/10 on the wrong scale
it's not just that
the fiance's "wrong" affects nothing more than her dignity, and considering the circumstances, it won't affect it much
the business's "wrong" has a LOT more cost involved
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:27 am to REG861
quote:
Read the thread dude. The guy running the videography company is career scam artist of Billy McFarland proportions
I'm going to repost this again.
Dude is an absolute slimeball that has conned people in multiple states and not paid many many independent contractors.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:32 am to stout
quote:Well, hopefully nobody is reading the OT for the detached and emotionless legal analysis and we're still free to wish for bad things to happen to assholes.
Also, your assumptions are going to be guided by emotions.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:32 am to Jester
I respect your right to say that.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:34 am to stout
quote:
Also, your assumptions are going to be guided by emotions
No. They are guided by the guys long history of being a conman and a worthless oat of a human being.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:37 am to Salmon
quote:
No. They are guided by the guys long history of being a conman and a worthless oat of a human being.
Anyone still defending him clearly hasn't read the entire thread. Dude probably has another involuntary psych hold coming his way.
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:39 am to Salmon
quote:
They are guided by the guys long history of being a conman and a worthless oat of a human being.
AKA emotions
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:42 am to stout
quote:
AKA emotions
what?
his history has nothing to do with "emotions"
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:42 am to stout
quote:OK, Jesse.
AKA emotions
Posted on 5/27/20 at 9:55 am to Mud_Till_May
quote:
“Today would have been the day where we would have filmed Justin and Alexis’ wedding. After what Justin pulled with the media stunt to try and shake us down for a refund we hope you sob and cry all day for what would have been your wedding day,”
Jesus.
As someone who lost a 5-year girlfriend/fiancee in a car crash before we were married and suffered guilt and sadness for years over it; and as someone who is currently engaged to be married in October - they can go frick themselves for even THINKING this, let alone writing it.
My ex dying in a crash was the worst thing that's ever happened to me by a longshot and I still suffer to this day over it, 9 years later. Meeting my current fiancee and being engaged to her is the best thing that's ever happened to me.
frick these people for mocking both, I hope everything bad that's possible comes their way.
Page 7 of 9
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News