- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Californians want LGBT Pedophiles exempt from the sex offender rolls
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:08 pm to Jax-Tiger
The “big one” can’t come soon enough.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:08 pm to Jax-Tiger
Following their dumb logic of “love who and what you want” it should be. Soon pro-incest laws will follow.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:08 pm to Jax-Tiger
Just the other day, i was wondering what happened to that Milo guy that used to be worshipped around here, and now this thread. almost serendipitous.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:10 pm to Jax-Tiger
Sounds totally logical.
Sarcasm: OFF
Sarcasm: OFF
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:12 pm to Jax-Tiger
If I'm a parent of young children I'm packing up tonight and leaving that hell hole of a state.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:13 pm to Jax-Tiger
The bottom of your article says hetero pedophiles in CA already have those protections.
This post was edited on 2/18/20 at 3:14 pm
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:32 pm to Jax-Tiger
What the hell? Nowhere in the bill are the words homosexual or gay mentioned; nor is LGBT.
From this excerpt it appears judges would have the discretion to decide if a particular offense by anyone, straight or gay, is worthy of a lifetime label of sex offender. Why is that not reasonable?
From this excerpt it appears judges would have the discretion to decide if a particular offense by anyone, straight or gay, is worthy of a lifetime label of sex offender. Why is that not reasonable?
quote:
This bill would exempt from mandatory registration under the act a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor and if that offense is the only one requiring the person to register.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:35 pm to Jax-Tiger
Curious where the language is. I scanned through the bill and didn't see any direct callouts for BLTBBQ:
quote:
Existing law, the Sex Offender Registration Act, requires a person convicted of one of certain crimes, as specified, to register with law enforcement as a sex offender while residing in California or while attending school or working in California, as specified. A willful failure to register, as required by the act, is a misdemeanor or felony, depending on the underlying offense.
This bill would exempt from mandatory registration under the act a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor and if that offense is the only one requiring the person to register.
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:37 pm to Jax-Tiger
#youcan’tlegislatelove
Consequences
Consequences
Posted on 2/18/20 at 3:59 pm to Jax-Tiger
they just want to get married. just let them get married and everything will be cool
Posted on 2/18/20 at 4:05 pm to Jax-Tiger
Literally what Milo got cancelled over except he went about 2% as far as they are going.
Our fabulous Queen leader cut down for nothing
Our fabulous Queen leader cut down for nothing
This post was edited on 2/18/20 at 4:06 pm
Posted on 2/18/20 at 4:24 pm to Jax-Tiger
Basically now the law differentiates between vaginal and anal/oral sex with teenagers 15 or older.
So currently, a judge can use discretion for a 19 year old and 17 year old having vaginal sex and not for a 19 year old and a 17 year old having anal sex.
Lots of people took the bait here.
So currently, a judge can use discretion for a 19 year old and 17 year old having vaginal sex and not for a 19 year old and a 17 year old having anal sex.
Lots of people took the bait here.
This post was edited on 2/18/20 at 4:26 pm
Posted on 2/18/20 at 5:06 pm to Jax-Tiger
everyone knows why they want this
just come out and say sex offender rolls discriminate against the alternative lifestyles of pedophiles and be done with the pretence
just come out and say sex offender rolls discriminate against the alternative lifestyles of pedophiles and be done with the pretence
Posted on 2/18/20 at 5:09 pm to Jax-Tiger
I agree, they shouldn't be on the sex offender registry.
they should be used as live targets at shooting ranges instead
they should be used as live targets at shooting ranges instead
Posted on 2/18/20 at 5:19 pm to Jax-Tiger
I love to shite on Cali as much as the next guy, but, yeah. Linky not great.
OP title is quite simply, false.
OP title is quite simply, false.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News