Why should we trust that AG Barr is not a political operative/appointee

He most likely, in his 70s, left a easy multimillion dollar job as a partner at one of the best firms in america...to potentially take all the heat for trump.

We still don't know who paid off all of BK's debts, mortgages before his confirmation.

Is it really implausible to suggest that GOP operatives have paid Barr multimillions through backchannels to steer the russia thing clear?

Its clear that the evidence in the report is damning, unethical, unflattering, and alarming, but not prosecutable. Our standard for governance and good faith in our institutions cannot just be *legality means acceptability*. That destroys all norms and customs that we side pass because of our good faith in man, belief in the greater good, belief in our good intentions, and bc we dont want to be straddled with over legislation and government oversight.

We are undoing those good faith measures now because far too many in this country base their morality off of our laws (which have been sadly immoral at various times in history).

What has Barr done to deserve our good faith in him considering how he has plagued the investigation from its outset? We have a documented, by his own admission, overseer of the most important political investigation in US history? Why should we just trust that he does have ulterior motives?

He's near retirement and possibly took a multimillion dollar pay cut for this pressure cooker?

Doesn't add up, nor should it to you either