Started By
Message

re: Would you want Trump/USA to take military action against N. Korea? Yes or No.

Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:40 pm to
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96820 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:40 pm to
Only for the security of US citizens, and only by the action of nuking them out of existence. No ground forces/innocent life blah blah bullshite
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
110173 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:40 pm to
I’d much rather China orchestrate a coup and kill Emperor Fudd. This is their mess and they need to take care of it.
Posted by mailman
Houston
Member since Jul 2009
6143 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:41 pm to
No
Posted by Buck Dancer
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2008
4689 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:42 pm to
Only if US lives were at risk. Do not think we should attack them to help out other countries.
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
110173 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

Only if US lives are in imminent danger.


If South Korean and Japanese lives are in immediate danger, I think that would be worth it. They’re our #4 and 6 trading partners. We need to look out for our mutual vested interests and decent people. Plus it can frick up relations with our #1 trading partner China.
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
37422 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:46 pm to
I'd love for us to wipe Kim and his regime off the map. Not so much the people of his country that are trapped there, but him and his stupid arse military regime who hold the people of that country hostage.

Then, I'd love for us to just drop nukes and wipe the middle East off the map. frick all those jihad aloha snackbar motherfrickers. Their values havd never and will never fit in with those of the western world. They want to erase western values from the world but many of the left wing parties of the west are too stupid to realize this and are creating policies that play right into the mooslums hands.
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 1:53 pm
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17172 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:47 pm to
No

They are saber rattlers. Dude has ZERO intention of actually firing a nuke at the USA or its allies.

He keeps his country in constant crisis as a means of control
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84094 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

He keeps his country in constant crisis as a means of control



This.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79680 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:50 pm to
No, but we should flank their arse with our navy and blow up any missile they fire........and then "accidentally" fire one at lil Kim's fortress.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
79592 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:53 pm to
I’m going to wait to see how it turns out and then when it’s obvious what the wrong decision was pretend that I warned everybody in advance and insult as many people as possible. Like everybody else does with every other military adventure.

By the way, it was me and me alone that favored killing Osama Bin Laden . Downvote if you are a Gump-loving pedo that hates pizza and dogs.
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
103331 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:56 pm to
No.
Posted by Nativebullet
Natchez, MS
Member since Feb 2011
5143 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 1:56 pm to
I play a lot of Call of Duty. And I'm actually well known as a specialized sniper. I get group invites regularly from all over so I know a thing or two about war. And war is not something we want so to answer your question. No.
Posted by little billy
Orange County, CA
Member since May 2015
8320 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:01 pm to
As a first strike? Absolutely not. Would be an awful decision and destabilize the region further. And hypothetically what would USA do after taking military action? Rebuild North Korea from scratch? I think we've already got too many such projects going currently.
Posted by ElephantGA
Fort Lauderdale, FL
Member since Sep 2015
538 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:04 pm to
No, next question.
Posted by Popths
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2016
4003 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:04 pm to
Do I want it? No. It's needed though. It's inevitable.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84094 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

I play a lot of Call of Duty. And I'm actually well known as a specialized sniper. I get group invites regularly from all over so I know a thing or two about war. And war is not something we want so to answer your question. No.



Post some stats or leave, sir.
Posted by rantfan
new iberia la
Member since Nov 2012
14110 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:07 pm to
Eventually. ...something needs to be done. China needs to be pushed by the international community to deal with NK.
Posted by Fivestarschief
Member since Nov 2017
123 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:07 pm to
Nope. Let that country deteriorate on its own.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
29062 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:10 pm to
quote:

What needs to happen is a regime change to cool it off. China doesn’t want millions of refuges flooding across their border nor do they want a western country on their border either.

Exactly. China needs to take a much more active role in the situation but do not appear to be doing so.
Posted by Kramer26
St. George, LA
Member since Jan 2005
6411 posts
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:12 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/27/20 at 10:55 pm
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram