- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would you want Trump/USA to take military action against N. Korea? Yes or No.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:45 pm to The Mick
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:45 pm to The Mick
quote:Better yet, China is hungry for land, has easy access to NK versus the 38th parallel. I say pull what Germany and the USSR did in 1939 with Poland, share the land right down the middle. Or if Korea doesn't want to deal with NK's population, China can have all of it and still enjoy that buffer zone to the south.
The question is should the US take military action against N.Korea for continually calling our bluff and making threats like the latest missile launch?
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 2:48 pm
0
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:46 pm to Havoc
quote:
China needs to take a much more active role in the situation but do not appear to be doing so.
Wouldn't it be funny if China were pulling NKs strings all along and goading the US into war?
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:46 pm to The Mick
no way. I dont mind being prepared and right on the border waiting for them to try and hit SK but I dont think we should be starting another war. let some of the regional players lead the strike and we can provide support.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:48 pm to diat150
quote:Man, we have all of these military assets and they're not being used. Like an airline grounding their planes for a few years. What would Rome do?
no way. I dont mind being prepared and right on the border waiting for them to try and hit SK but I dont think we should be starting another war. let some of the regional players lead the strike and we can provide support.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:52 pm to The Mick
quote:I decline to answer as I do not want black helicopters circling overhead.
Would you want USA to take military action against Trump/N. Korea?
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:55 pm to el Gaucho
quote:
No income tax, they sell beer on Sunday's, strip clubs are full naked, no speed traps etc
And weed is legal in NK
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 2:56 pm
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:56 pm to The Mick
Hell no. Too many people crammed in there.
Trump might be stupid but he’s not stupid enough to press the nuke button first.
Trump might be stupid but he’s not stupid enough to press the nuke button first.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 2:57 pm to The Mick
No, but he might not have a choice.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 3:04 pm to The Mick
I think a military intervention is inevitable. I just hope it is calculated carefully to minimize the resulting loss of life.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 3:32 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
When they drop a nuke on us first, everyone here on this board will be crying about why we didn't strike them when they threatened seriously. Wake the frick up people.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 3:57 pm to The Mick
do i want it, no, do i think it is necessary, yes
at this point rocket man has to go, he is mentally unstable and dangerous, one tiny mistake and that missile would have landed on japan soil killing a lot of people and the machines of war would have already be in full throttle melt down mode
i see only one real option to avoid war, and that is to take that lunatic out by assassination. lots of others in NK happy to take his place and they are in no hurry to start a war that ends up with half their country dead and them being made whole with SK under SK government control
at this point rocket man has to go, he is mentally unstable and dangerous, one tiny mistake and that missile would have landed on japan soil killing a lot of people and the machines of war would have already be in full throttle melt down mode
i see only one real option to avoid war, and that is to take that lunatic out by assassination. lots of others in NK happy to take his place and they are in no hurry to start a war that ends up with half their country dead and them being made whole with SK under SK government control
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:00 pm to keakar
quote:Are the missiles he's been shooting armed with nukes or just test missiles that don't have any oomf?
one tiny mistake and that missile would have landed on japan soil killing a lot of people and the machines of war would have already be in full throttle melt down mode
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:28 pm to The Mick
quote:
Are the missiles he's been shooting armed with nukes or just test missiles that don't have any oomf?
doesnt matter, even if it has no warhead, which it doesnt. it still has unspent fuel and the impact crater alone would level a city block around it so it could have possibly killed a few hundred people and done extreme damage to property.
a ballistic missile coming down like that only needs to be off course by a fraction of a degree to hit populated areas inside japan so he literally played russian roulette with their lives
Posted on 11/29/17 at 4:39 pm to keakar
quote:
and that is to take that lunatic out by assassination
I see people say assassinate "oh just assassinate him" like they are playing a mission in call of duty. Assassinating a head of state would not only create a political shite storm, it would also be impossible to carry out in NK. You really want to start a war try to kill him and fail.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:12 pm to The Mick
Not just no but frick no!
N. Koreans have to earn their freedom just like every other free country or theyll never appreciate it and in fact resent us for giving it to them like every other freedom-welfare country.
N. Koreans have to man up and fight for freedom. You get the government you deserve. If they want it bad enough theyll have it.
Dont give me none of that, "the people dont have guns and bombs and shite", excuse either. What is the Dear Leader going to do? Kill ALL the citizens? Whats a King without a Kingdom?
N. Koreans have to earn their freedom just like every other free country or theyll never appreciate it and in fact resent us for giving it to them like every other freedom-welfare country.
N. Koreans have to man up and fight for freedom. You get the government you deserve. If they want it bad enough theyll have it.
Dont give me none of that, "the people dont have guns and bombs and shite", excuse either. What is the Dear Leader going to do? Kill ALL the citizens? Whats a King without a Kingdom?
This post was edited on 11/29/17 at 5:16 pm
Posted on 11/29/17 at 5:17 pm to The Mick
no, we haven't finished in the mid-east yet.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 6:46 pm to The Mick
No
Posted on 11/29/17 at 6:52 pm to The Mick
Not no but frick no.... unless directly provoked
Posted on 11/29/17 at 6:55 pm to The Mick
I would like to point out the only informed replies in this thread came from poliboard regulars. OP is a fig.
Posted on 11/29/17 at 7:13 pm to The Mick
For NK to have a nuclear ICBM capability doesn't mean they plan to use it. That would be suicidal for them and also for anyone living in Seoul.
The more likely threat is that they'd sell missiles to the highest bidder. They desperately need the cash and there are quite a few non-nuclear nations that might want to take them up on it. Maybe even some "non-state actors". They could do this and nobody would likely know until the deal is done.
The more likely threat is that they'd sell missiles to the highest bidder. They desperately need the cash and there are quite a few non-nuclear nations that might want to take them up on it. Maybe even some "non-state actors". They could do this and nobody would likely know until the deal is done.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News