- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Average Sq Ft of homes by decade
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:47 pm
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:47 pm
For those complaining about housing costs, remember that buying smaller is also an option. Part of the cost problem is people demanding bigger homes.
1920: 1,048 square feet
1930: 1,129
1940: 1,177
1950: 983
1960: 1,289
1970: 1,500
1980: 1,740
1990: 2,080
2000: 2,266
2010: 2,392
2014: 2,657
1920: 1,048 square feet
1930: 1,129
1940: 1,177
1950: 983
1960: 1,289
1970: 1,500
1980: 1,740
1990: 2,080
2000: 2,266
2010: 2,392
2014: 2,657
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:50 pm to Auburn80
You aren’t wrong. People want their McMansions and like to get those massive SUVs too.
My grandparents had a house in an older section of town, pier and beam foundation, probably 1300 square feet. It was a cozy place, and the back den was a great place to watch a ballgame with the grandparents.
My grandparents had a house in an older section of town, pier and beam foundation, probably 1300 square feet. It was a cozy place, and the back den was a great place to watch a ballgame with the grandparents.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:04 am to TexasTiger08
And to think all those familys had 5-10 kids in them small arse houses
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:08 am to ellunchboxo
quote:
to think all those familys had 5-10 kids in them small arse houses
Not only did you not get your own room, you didn't always get your own bed.
To share a bathroom meant you got up before the rooster most days.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:12 am to Auburn80
Do you think that our government is and has been fiscally irresponsible relative to printing money?
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:51 am to Auburn80
My house is 4750 sq ft. Just letting y’all know that.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 1:11 am to Auburn80
Well shite, by 2035 average size should be 3500
Posted on 4/23/26 at 1:19 am to Auburn80
I'm also curious about average lot size
Posted on 4/23/26 at 1:29 am to Auburn80
I spent the last 16 years in 1000sf, one bathroom house built in the 60s
You can keep your cozy.
I'm about to enjoy the hell out of 3000sf inside, 1500sf covered, brick patio, and a workshop.
We made cozy (read cramped) work because we had to.
Give me an updated, expanded 70s ranch house any day.
You can keep your cozy.
I'm about to enjoy the hell out of 3000sf inside, 1500sf covered, brick patio, and a workshop.
We made cozy (read cramped) work because we had to.
Give me an updated, expanded 70s ranch house any day.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 1:47 am to Auburn80
Our house is right around 2500 sq ft and was built in the late 60s... we bought it in 2009 and it's still the largest house in the neighborhood. With them having kids later, millennials don't need big starter houses but so many of them want what Gen X has elevated to.
Our village is not shy about their disdain for people like my wife and I who are in no hurry to downsize. Constant whining about school enrollment falling and young families not having homes to buy. Sorry not sorry.
Our village is not shy about their disdain for people like my wife and I who are in no hurry to downsize. Constant whining about school enrollment falling and young families not having homes to buy. Sorry not sorry.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 2:03 am to Auburn80
People are much wider now too so they need the extra space
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:06 am to Auburn80
quote:
For those complaining about housing costs, remember that buying smaller is also an option.
Doesn’t matter. We sold our 1200 square foot townhome for 160k more than we bought it for in 2025. Owned it for 7 years.
No one was paying 350k for a 1200ft townhome in the 90s
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:23 am to Auburn80
quote:
Average Sq Ft of homes by decade
Hot damn you mean that the numbers from the other thread about houses being unaffordable compared to 1971 are total bullshite?
And you can basically get two houses for your money now compared to 60 years or so ago?
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 4:58 am
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:25 am to Auburn80
Damn my house was considered small when it was built in the 80s. I'm in 1000 sf.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:30 am to biglego
quote:Yeah, but you know, it's not the size that matters; it's how you use it.
My house is 4750 sq ft. Just letting y’all know that.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:43 am to Auburn80
We are building some big houses now. Didn’t think the average was quite that big
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 5:00 am
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:49 am to fr33manator
quote:
Give me an updated, expanded 70s ranch house any day.
You need to be before the dreaded "split level"
Say post WWII to early 70's ranch?
Great house to grow old in.
Smaller size
No steps
BR's on one side, kitchen & garage on the other, middle for gathering.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:56 am to biglego
quote:
People are much wider now too so they need the extra space
Our homes and bodies have expanded.
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:59 am to Auburn80
quote:The cost problem is the cost of construction itself.
Part of the cost problem is people demanding bigger homes.
The companies building the homes have increased the sizes over time.
People don’t design and build their own homes.
But let’s look into that. Why don’t we design and build a house in this thread.
LINK
quote:Now that $162/sqft is based off of the 2,647 sqft average home. If the average home size fell, the cost per sqft would likely increase to compensate.
The average cost of constructing a new home was $428,215 in 2024, the highest level recorded by NAHB since it began its annual cost surveys in 1998. This equates to around $162 per square foot of finished floor space, with the average home spanning 2,647 square feet in 2024.
If we use that number, we can get the following:
1000 sqft home - ~$162,000
1500 sqft home - ~$243,000
2000 sqft home - ~$324,000
By the way, that doesn’t even address the cost to purchase land to build the home on.
If you can live very rural, that can be cheap, but for most urban and suburban regions, the land will be expensive per acre, not to mention the costs associated with tearing down the previous home, clearing the land of trees, etc.
In summary, for the average 1500 sqft home that existed in the 70s, the cost would start at ~$200-240,000 just to build the home, and could easily exceed $300k depending on land.
And that is just with the assumption that the cost per sqft wouldn’t go up as the home size declines.
So, why don’t people just build a home?
Because it is also expensive as frick and time consuming.
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 6:01 am
Posted on 4/23/26 at 5:03 am to Auburn80
That may apply to SOME young potential homeowners.
The truth is most would be just fine buying those smaller square foot houses. It's that those neighborhoods have all gone to shite and become ghetto and no one decent wants to live in those neighborhooods.
There aren't enough starter homes being built with realistic sq ft. Developers are building apartments in the same footprint and making a lot more $.
It's not JUST that people want more home than they need. That is a problem too though, to be sure.
The truth is most would be just fine buying those smaller square foot houses. It's that those neighborhoods have all gone to shite and become ghetto and no one decent wants to live in those neighborhooods.
There aren't enough starter homes being built with realistic sq ft. Developers are building apartments in the same footprint and making a lot more $.
It's not JUST that people want more home than they need. That is a problem too though, to be sure.
Popular
Back to top


38













