Started By
Message

Jabbed vs unjabbed kids.

Posted on 4/14/26 at 9:31 am
Posted by Night Vision
Member since Feb 2018
21290 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 9:31 am
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
20485 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 9:33 am to
Whoda guessed messing with intact immune systems might have consequences?
Posted by how333
Member since Dec 2020
4371 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 9:40 am to
Did we really need a "study" to conclude this?
Posted by nealnan8
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2016
4559 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 9:50 am to
LINK

The Henry Ford study was not "buried". it was not published due to faulty methodology in the study.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
21951 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 9:51 am to
Not sure why people would downvote this. The presenter goes over good, hard data. It doesn't claim unvaccinated had zero health problems. It goes over the health issues they saw in kids from both groups.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
21951 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 10:00 am to
quote:


LINK

The Henry Ford study was not "buried". it was not published due to faulty methodology in the study.


The data was rather stark in contrast. Is there not enough evidence here to support a "real" study that meets all the requirements of using same racial groups, same age ranges, same birth conditions? It sure looks that way but yet the community is refusing to do such studies. Any guesses why?
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
16702 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 10:07 am to
quote:

Did we really need a "study" to conclude this?



Do you have kids? Are they vaccinated?
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
16702 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 10:11 am to
quote:

The data was rather stark in contrast. Is there not enough evidence here to support a "real" study that meets all the requirements of using same racial groups, same age ranges, same birth conditions? It sure looks that way but yet the community is refusing to do such studies. Any guesses why?




Yep. No much larger follow up study is the real story. Science is supposed to be about questioning. There is often an intersection between a lot of money and a lack of curiosity, though.
Posted by Sweep Da Leg
Member since Sep 2013
3202 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Do you have kids? Are they vaccinated?


The first is and gets sick all the time. The second isn’t and has been sick once a year and it’s a cold.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
54367 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 11:31 am to
I feel sorry for both of them.
Posted by Sweep Da Leg
Member since Sep 2013
3202 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 11:49 am to
quote:

I feel sorry for both of them.


Why? They’re both extremely intelligent, hard working, great sense of humor, outstanding manners, and just well rounded kids who can think for themselves as Americans should be. It’s how you raise them properly.
Sorry I don’t want them to be a retarded marxist sheep like you
Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
37634 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

Whoda guessed messing with intact immune systems might have consequences?

A few "philanthropists" we know will feign surprise.

Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
60929 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

The first is and gets sick all the time. The second isn’t and has been sick once a year and it’s a cold.



Were you vaccinated when you were a baby/kid?
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11802 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 12:52 pm to
They listed a few specific flaws - like the groups not being comparable. If those are real issues, the results get hard to interpret. If not, then it’d be worth digging into why they’re being dismissed.
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
16702 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

I feel sorry for both of them.




Why is that?
Posted by LSUfor8
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2018
363 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 3:18 pm to
Kinda naive to think Henry Ford would admit to burying the study. Of course they’re going to come up with reasons why they didn’t publish.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63328 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 3:21 pm to
So is this board now completely anti-vaccine?
Posted by LSUfor8
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2018
363 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 3:29 pm to
LINK

They above used a different methodology on the same data. With the number of vaccines children are now exposed to, more of these vaccinated vs non-vaccinated children studies need to be done.
Posted by BuzzSaw 12
The Dark Side Of The Moon
Member since Dec 2010
6912 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 3:37 pm to
Our PT "medical experts" have arrived to do damage control.

Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
74643 posts
Posted on 4/14/26 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Henry Ford Health was unaware this rejected and unvalidated draft from the early COVID era had somehow been shared or was being discussed, and the health system was never given an opportunity to weigh in on the topic. In addition, because the draft was shared without the system’s knowledge, there’s reason to believe it’s been altered from its original form and made to appear finalized, which it was not. 


I'd like to see the info/study as it was presented to whomever is funding/doing this "documentary" and compare it to the study that was submitted to Henry Ford. Not the word of the researchers, but the actual data presented in both instances.

That would tell the full story.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram