- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
LSUfor8
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | Baton Rouge |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | Retired |
| Number of Posts: | 363 |
| Registered on: | 11/26/2018 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
That’s what happens when you have limited social skills. You lash out at people who you deem inferior to you.
1
If you’re pro-vax, they’re flaws, and if you’re anti-vax, they’re strengths.
Not necessary. If I want to learn more about immunology, I’ll find someone who actually is qualified. Besides, I’m sure your schedule has been cleared since 8:30 this morning.
quote:
If the underlying groups aren’t comparable, does reanalyzing the same data fix that?
quote:
If any of those are off, different "analyses" of the same data can point in totally different directions.
I think you answered your own question above with your second quote.
That’s what I was getting at when I posted a link to a separate analysis. In the second study, they did find similar results as the first, but even more unfavorable to the vaccinated group.
Now Crazy admonishes any study whose data doesn’t favor the vaccinated group as anti-vax and propagated by those groups. It’s almost as if he’s never championed any studies that are pro-vaccine. It’s perfectly fine to have different opinions without being derogatory.
I haven’t really found any decent studies on vax vs no vax that didn’t have pro or anti-vaccine biases. Until such legitimate studies are done without any biases, there will never be an agreed upon answer. I truly hope such studies are forth coming.
LINK
They above used a different methodology on the same data. With the number of vaccines children are now exposed to, more of these vaccinated vs non-vaccinated children studies need to be done.
They above used a different methodology on the same data. With the number of vaccines children are now exposed to, more of these vaccinated vs non-vaccinated children studies need to be done.
Kinda naive to think Henry Ford would admit to burying the study. Of course they’re going to come up with reasons why they didn’t publish.
I’d love to see the actual video of her arrest to see how brave she really is.
re: Jabs increase risk for 7 major types of cancer
Posted by LSUfor8 on 12/10/25 at 4:59 pm to onmymedicalgrind
LINK
This is the article mentioned in the first video. It comes from Biomedical Research, Volume 13, Article 114.
The second video discusses an article from Experimental and Clinical Sciences Journal.
LINK
Why did you ask a poster to provide a link? Why couldn’t you listen to both X videos and look up the articles yourself? That’s what I did in about 10 minutes.
Are you one of these younger docs who can’t do anything without an algorithm or someone spoon feeding you info?
You asked for links to review. They’re now provided for you. Will you now read them and tell us why they are or are not to be believed?
The choice is entirely yours.
:cheers:
This is the article mentioned in the first video. It comes from Biomedical Research, Volume 13, Article 114.
The second video discusses an article from Experimental and Clinical Sciences Journal.
LINK
Why did you ask a poster to provide a link? Why couldn’t you listen to both X videos and look up the articles yourself? That’s what I did in about 10 minutes.
Are you one of these younger docs who can’t do anything without an algorithm or someone spoon feeding you info?
You asked for links to review. They’re now provided for you. Will you now read them and tell us why they are or are not to be believed?
The choice is entirely yours.
:cheers:
Peons that we are, we’ll probably never know the real truth. The back and forth in this thread reminds me of “Rounders” with Woodward as Teddy KBG.
Teddy KGB:
Nyet, nyet. He beat me. Straight up. Pay him. Pay that man his money.
Teddy KGB:
Nyet, nyet. He beat me. Straight up. Pay him. Pay that man his money.
re: Jordan: John Brennan Referred to DOJ for Criminal Prosecution
Posted by LSUfor8 on 10/21/25 at 1:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
Are you just being perfectly, Frank!!
quote:
acting as Useful Idiots
They’re not acting.
You are correct. Click the yelp link in OP, click add review, and look at the warning: no more reviews because they’re getting too many negative reviews due to the “news”.
Amazing how certain posters spread their ilk
Posted by LSUfor8 on 7/24/25 at 4:00 am
without any certifiable documentation other than that provided by the MSM. These posters are either plants or delusional to believe what they believe.
I’ve been reading this board for years. I rarely respond because most times it’s not worth my time. I’ve had enough. I’m an old guy. Only thing I care about is protecting my kids and their kids.
Both sides have poor posters whom I don’t feel the necessity to respond to. Most recently, there are a number of
posters who clog the board with negative shite without any credibility.
VOR, Pandy Sackler, masterdecatur, lowTboy, 4liberalcubbies, etc all could not function in a society that is dependent on production to survive.
You people need to wake the F up. This is not a game. You nimrods choose Epstein files over possible criminal acts by a formal president who at the end of the day is half white (he got his ears from Kenya).
Your priorities show how fricking delusional you really are.
I’ve been reading this board for years. I rarely respond because most times it’s not worth my time. I’ve had enough. I’m an old guy. Only thing I care about is protecting my kids and their kids.
Both sides have poor posters whom I don’t feel the necessity to respond to. Most recently, there are a number of
posters who clog the board with negative shite without any credibility.
VOR, Pandy Sackler, masterdecatur, lowTboy, 4liberalcubbies, etc all could not function in a society that is dependent on production to survive.
You people need to wake the F up. This is not a game. You nimrods choose Epstein files over possible criminal acts by a formal president who at the end of the day is half white (he got his ears from Kenya).
Your priorities show how fricking delusional you really are.
re: Trump has probably done some bad things in the files. Are we going to just let that go?
Posted by LSUfor8 on 7/24/25 at 3:18 am to Tvilletiger
Are you BFF with Pandy Splatter? Sure sounds like it. No intelligence required in either of your posts. Try intelligence once in your lives.
Paper does not refuse ink. Internet does not refuse dumb posters.
Paper does not refuse ink. Internet does not refuse dumb posters.
re: One thing these ODNI docs seem to make clear is that rank and file cia folk seem honest
Posted by LSUfor8 on 7/23/25 at 10:16 pm to Bunk Moreland
How about Pandy Packster? He fits right in.
Criminal acts don’t fall under normal duties of the president under the Constitution. Maybe Jarrett doesn’t read enough.
When naming the women, why didn’t you include Pandy Faclker? Asking for a friend.
re: Trumps new commercial for Massie
Posted by LSUfor8 on 7/19/25 at 12:45 am to NawlinsTiger9
Well, you’re the expert on dumb. Care to respond so the rest of us will be enlightened.
re: Question for the attorneys and/or Boosie about limitations.
Posted by LSUfor8 on 7/19/25 at 12:41 am to boosiebadazz
Overall, I think you might be an intelligent person. However, your posts say otherwise.
Doesn’t matter which way you lean politically, but your posts are tiresome and predictable. End of the day, you do you.
Doesn’t matter which way you lean politically, but your posts are tiresome and predictable. End of the day, you do you.
quote:
It was blatant sarcasm bro.
I got it. I was your second upvote.
Depends on what part of Italy he’s from, north or south. If south see coolpapaboze reply pic. For reference see the movie: True Romance.
Popular
10
