- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Over 800 gamers tried and utterly failed to beat a classic '80s game without a guide
Posted on 3/5/26 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 3/5/26 at 3:01 pm
Never played it, those were my C64 days.
LINK
quote:
As spotted by PC Gamer, the Adventure Game Aptitude Test, which was held on February 28, 2026, gave players a 4-hour window to clear Maniac Mansion blind. According to How Long To Beat, Maniac Mansion tends to take players somewhere around three and a half hours to beat — meaning the test takers wouldn't have much wiggle room with the game if they got stuck.
So, how'd people fare? Worse than you'd think! Out of 831 participants, only two people managed to get through Maniac Mansion within the allotted time span without any help.
LINK
4
Posted on 3/5/26 at 3:38 pm to travelgamer
It was a tough game with multiple endings. Really ahead of its time.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 3:43 pm to travelgamer
I don't find this surprising at all because it's not designed to be beaten in 4 hours.
The game has a lot of trial and error on purpose. You can do a ton of things that get you killed or ruin the playthrough. That is part of the intended experience.
They didn't build the game such that someone who had never played it before could "figure it out" easily.
If you follow a guide you can beat the game in like what 15 minutes? Imagine paying $50 in 1989 for a game you completely beat in less than an hour.
It's purposefully cryptic and built around trial and error to give it a lot of replay value and the joy of discovering new things.
it definitely was. The fact you can beat the game like a wide variety of totally different ways and solve the same problems in different ways with different party compositions, for that era it was extremely revolutionary.
The game has a lot of trial and error on purpose. You can do a ton of things that get you killed or ruin the playthrough. That is part of the intended experience.
They didn't build the game such that someone who had never played it before could "figure it out" easily.
If you follow a guide you can beat the game in like what 15 minutes? Imagine paying $50 in 1989 for a game you completely beat in less than an hour.
It's purposefully cryptic and built around trial and error to give it a lot of replay value and the joy of discovering new things.
quote:
Really ahead of its time.
it definitely was. The fact you can beat the game like a wide variety of totally different ways and solve the same problems in different ways with different party compositions, for that era it was extremely revolutionary.
This post was edited on 3/5/26 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 3/5/26 at 7:10 pm to travelgamer
Now do Battletoads or the Ultra Games TMNT
This post was edited on 3/6/26 at 5:49 am
Posted on 3/5/26 at 7:25 pm to VoxDawg
Psht. Lion king.
End of story.
End of story.
Posted on 3/5/26 at 10:37 pm to travelgamer
That was a great game. I remember it fondly. And definitely not easy to solve.
Posted on 3/6/26 at 8:20 am to beerJeep
quote:
Psht. Lion king.
I think I saw adult Simba once in hundreds of attempts at this game as a kid
Posted on 3/6/26 at 3:56 pm to HogX
quote:
I think I saw adult Simba once in hundreds of attempts
Shiiiiiiitttttt you made it past the monkeys?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News