- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Fed Chair Says U.S. May Be Drastically Overstating Jobs Numbers
Posted on 12/11/25 at 6:40 am
Posted on 12/11/25 at 6:40 am
quote:
Fed Chair Jerome Powell pointed on Wednesday to a job-market risk that economists have been worried about for months: Official statistics could be drastically overstating recent hiring.
Powell said that Fed staffers believe that federal data could be overestimating job creation by up to 60,000 jobs a month. Given that figures published so far show that the economy has added about 40,000 jobs a month since April, the real number could be something more like a loss of 20,000 jobs a month, Powell said.
quote:
Published data already show the labor market has slowed significantly this year, down from rapid hiring after the Covid-19 pandemic. This slower pace means big data revisions can more easily reveal the economy is shedding jobs, not adding them.
“It’s a complicated, unusual, and difficult situation, where the labor market is also under pressure, where job creation may actually be negative,” Powell said.
That concern provided some of the backing for the Fed’s decision to cut interest rates at a third straight meeting, Powell said, despite a labor market that still looks healthy on the surface, with unemployment at a relatively modest 4.4% in September and a net gain of 119,000 jobs that month. Next week, the Labor Department will report fresh jobs numbers for October and November, as well as possible revisions for previous months.
Powell’s concern involves a quandary that the Labor Department faces when measuring hiring: how to judge the number of jobs added or destroyed when new businesses are created or close down. Those jobs can’t be surveyed directly because it is difficult for the government to reach out to brand-new companies or companies no longer in business.
Instead, Labor’s data arm, the Bureau of Labor Statistics, must use a statistical model to make a guess. In the past few years, that technique, called the birth-death model—referring to the births and deaths of businesses—has contributed to estimates that have overstated job creation by hundreds of thousands of jobs a year, forcing significant downward revisions later.
quote:
The Labor Department’s struggles have spilled into politics, prompting President Trump to blame data problems on what he called efforts to manipulate figures for political ends. He fired the BLS’s commissioner, Erika McEntarfer, after sharp revisions in August ate into springtime jobs growth, leaving the agency in the hands of a nonpartisan career official who is serving as its acting leader.
LINK
Posted on 12/11/25 at 6:43 am to ragincajun03
That's why Trump fired the independent analysts that compiled the data. This way we only get the numbers Trump wishes existed, and even those numbers are bad.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 6:45 am to TBoy
quote:
That's why Trump fired the independent analysts that compiled the data. This way we only get the numbers Trump wishes existed, and even those numbers are bad.
quote:
by TBoy

Posted on 12/11/25 at 6:45 am to ragincajun03
What else did he say?
This post was edited on 12/11/25 at 6:46 am
Posted on 12/11/25 at 6:45 am to ragincajun03
He's juuuuuuuust a little late to the party.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 6:46 am to TBoy
quote:
That's why Trump fired the independent analysts that compiled the data
LOL. So this kind of thing was never a problem in the Biden administration, right? At this point, let’s just disband whatever government department is doing this and find another way.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 6:48 am to SloaneRanger
quote:
LOL. So this kind of thing was never a problem in the Biden administration, right? At this point, let’s just disband whatever government department is doing this and find another way.
That is exactly right. The Fed chair also said this has been going on forever and is corrected twice a year. That is what led to that huge revision under Biden. Tboy is a retard.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 6:50 am to TBoy
Of course trump is gaming the numbers. They all are.
Didn’t they revise biden’s numbers down in 11 of his last 12 months in office?
Didn’t they revise biden’s numbers down in 11 of his last 12 months in office?
Posted on 12/11/25 at 6:51 am to TDTOM
The job numbers are garbage in 2025
I don't think it's very productive to get into the finger pointing and partisan politics of it but it's kinda silly to pretend that everything is awesome when it isn't
I don't think it's very productive to get into the finger pointing and partisan politics of it but it's kinda silly to pretend that everything is awesome when it isn't
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:01 am to G2160
quote:
Didn’t they revise biden’s numbers down in 11 of his last 12 months in office?
Job numbers go through preliminary, secondary, and final estimates, and most of the time they are revised downwards. I'm trying to locate the data, but it's something like 60-80% of the reports are revised downwards.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:04 am to TDTOM
quote:
Were they good in 2024?
They seemed to be in the initial reports, but as was pointed out here already, they got revised down. So looking at the revised numbers, 2024 may have been pointing towards an incoming recession.
The past few decades have shown a recession every 8-10 years, so it may be about time in the cycle. Last non-government forced recession was 2015/2016 towards the end of Obama’s second term. Obviously 2020 included a recession, but that came about because governments worldwide shut down commerce so we could “flatten the curve in only two weeks”.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:05 am to ragincajun03
Christmas spending is up though!
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:06 am to ragincajun03
Where was Powell the entire Biden admin? Asleep?
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:07 am to TBoy
quote:
That's why Trump fired the independent analysts that compiled the data. This way we only get the numbers Trump wishes existed, and even those numbers are bad.
Trump doesn’t let them release any economic data anymore. I’m sure if it was good he wouldn’t stop exaggerating how great it was.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:12 am to TBoy
quote:
That's why Trump fired the independent analysts that compiled the data. This way we only get the numbers Trump wishes existed, and even those numbers are bad.
This sad part is the lady in charge of the whole thing was a Trump loyalist, she was just doing her job description.
This post was edited on 12/11/25 at 7:24 am
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:16 am to SloaneRanger
quote:
LOL. So this kind of thing was never a problem in the Biden administration, right? At this point, let’s just disband whatever government department is doing this and find another way
Trump already fired and then silenced the BLS. I worked with the BLS for years and while data collection and revisions seem complicated to people unfamiliar with the process they always did great work.
If there’s anything the government always did well it was data collection. Trump convinced idiots to call anything they don’t like fake.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:19 am to TBoy
well we all know that Biden inflated the numbers!
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:19 am to TDTOM
quote:
Were they good in 2024?
They were excellent. If you understand the process you understand why they get released and then revised. The idea that data geeks were trying to manipulate the process for partisan politics was a garbage claim.
Posted on 12/11/25 at 7:21 am to ragincajun03
Don't they always? Then remove 80% as they "revise down"?
Popular
Back to top

17








