countrytiger60

the two players were not going to be starters. they would add depth. from the very beginning Lane said they would not play the players if they weren't eligible. Sankey got his arse handed to him on the witness stand by the players lawyer because he lied and couldn't answer questions. LSU as a school never did anything wrong. Sankey and a few of his minions thought that they could scare LSU into thinking that they would be kicked out of the SEC. boy did that backfire on them! now Sankey and the SEC will be sued by those same two players who aren't even on LSU's team. lol the stories just write themselves.

what are you going to do about it! lol

poor Boar, if only once you knew what you were talking about instead of just running your mouth. you make yourself look and sound like an idiot!

the NCAA ruled Chambliss ineligible. they got a Miss. judge to rule in their favor so he could play. Sankey never said a word. I wonder why!

ok, what derogatory statement did he make. Sankey wanted to talk about free speech. but not Lane's free speech. sounds just like a liberal dumbass to me.

it's over. no penalties.

Texas was the ESPN darling! lol

since you think you know so much, tell us what Lane did that was wrong. what rule did he break?

hey pussy, if you're scared just say it. :doublebird:

that's not happening.

we know that you probably do!