- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
| Favorite team: | Texas A&M  |
| Location: | houston |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 2287 |
| Registered on: | 5/30/2013 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
quote:
People won’t admit/realize this but Kamala had a similar plan to counter cartels.
Open our borders and let them operate here?
0
re: Another threat at Mar-A-Lago = few details - one person shot/killed
Posted by G2160 on 2/22/26 at 9:45 am to beaux duke
quote:
The most violent demographic in the county is the democrat voter. It is not even close and the statistics prove it.
quote:
link?
quote:
Just go to the FBI website and do a search of violent crime by demographics. And then remember that—depending on the poll—roughly 65% to 85% of black Americans identify as Democrats. Put the two together and, voila!
quote:
ah. so you just hate black people shocking
Communist beliefs aren’t based on anything besides what narratives can be leveraged for political gain.
Literally doing the meme by trying to end a point about statistics with “you’re racist”.
re: The strategy against AOC. Let her talk.
Posted by G2160 on 2/21/26 at 4:26 am to Demonbengal
quote:
This is the strategy against all honest leftists.
Their voters don’t care. They want to advance social causes and/or free shite.
re: New York Dog Owners: Dogs to be Let Out in TIMES SQUARE During muslim call to prayer!!
Posted by G2160 on 2/20/26 at 2:32 pm to beaux duke
quote:
so the same boomers that cried and cried about don lemon interrupting a church service are totally fine with disrupting a muslim event because they're brown and scary the same group that "just wants to be left alone" is hell bent on destroying someone else's prayer meeting
If that someone else is Muslim and engaging in a public display of intimidation, yes.
But the vast majority of NYCers will side with the religion who flew planes into their buildings and won’t do shite.
quote:
"Western society" and will be fine. Don't be a pussy...
Going great
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
By the way, 1% or less of the population identifies as trans, and they're not after me or my family. i don't care what they are if they're not harming anyone.
Do you mean with bullets or by demanding compliance with destruction of traditional western society?
re: What can the Texas men here tell me about James Talarico
Posted by G2160 on 2/18/26 at 4:46 pm to Dawgsontop34
quote:
Fwiw, that’s never traditionally applied to talk shows.
Fwiw, you’re wrong.
Whether it was enforced or not (like our borders) is a different matter.
re: What can the Texas men here tell me about James Talarico
Posted by G2160 on 2/18/26 at 10:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Which is exactly what's happening outside of the echo chamber. Just google Trump Colbert and see all the responses and criticisms of the admin. For what? Targeting a leftist echo chamber that will influence nobody, at this point?
Of course they’re doing this. This is their next go to move after crying about racism.
Your advocating for selective enforcement of the law (like ICE in Minneapolis), is again noted.
re: What can the Texas men here tell me about James Talarico
Posted by G2160 on 2/18/26 at 10:18 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So you think the FCC went rogue to target late night talk show hosts?
The paragraph before the text you quoted (which I’ve already linked directly from FCC.gov) says:
quote:
Concerns have been raised that the industry has taken the Media Bureau’s 2006 staff-level decision to mean that the interview portion of all arguably similar entertainment programs— whether late night or daytime—are exempted from the section 315 equal opportunities requirement under a bona fide news exemption. This is not the case. As noted above, these decisions are fact specific and the exemptions are limited to the program that was the subject of the request.
Which we know that you didn’t understand, because you had this question previously in the thread:
quote:
And why is this now a violation of that law (purportedly)?
Despite your not understanding what was being discussed, you were drawn to this topic like a moth to flame unable to pass up the opportunity to libsplain to the board how this was an “unforced error” by the admin, including giving:
quote:
the Left/DEMs more ammo for their "authoritarian/fascist" rhetoric
re: What can the Texas men here tell me about James Talarico
Posted by G2160 on 2/18/26 at 9:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Nothing in that story affects the point of the admin forcing the FCC to change its rules that have been in place for decades.
The admin did not force the FCC to change its rules.
quote:
So you're ok with blatant corruption as long as it's against someone that thinks differently than you? Sounds kinda shitty
In this case, I’m not only ok with it, I am celebrating it.
re: What can the Texas men here tell me about James Talarico
Posted by G2160 on 2/17/26 at 2:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It literally hasn't been. Even a month ago, it wasn't, and that was the law for decades. That new FCC guidance IS the unforced error
Decades ago, Congress made the decision to prevent covered broadcast television programs from being used to advance certain partisan political purposes. Specifically, through section 315 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended,2 Congress put protections in place to ensure equal access to broadcast station facilities for legally qualified candidates for office, regardless of political affiliation.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.re: What can the Texas men here tell me about James Talarico
Posted by G2160 on 2/17/26 at 11:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And why is this now a violation of that law (purportedly)?
What if it’s always been a violation of the law?
But you’re the lawyer, why don’t you tell us?
re: What can the Texas men here tell me about James Talarico
Posted by G2160 on 2/17/26 at 11:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Unforced errors like this won't help
CBS pulled the interview so as not to be in violation of equal time laws.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. I don’t know if this is true, but there are articles out there of him wanting more civil rights tourism in Nashville, complaining about people not following covid guidelines and questioning ICE enforcement. One of the investors in acme was a democrat mayoral candidate.
Grok:
Did Renee good’s car make contact at all with the federal agent who shot her?
**No, Renee Good's car did not make contact with the federal agent (ICE officer Jonathan Ross) who shot her.**
Multiple sources, including video analyses from outlets like The New York Times, ABC News, CNN, The Washington Post, and CBS News, describe the incident on January 7, 2026, in Minneapolis. Good was in her SUV, which was stopped perpendicular to the street. Ross approached and positioned himself at the front-left of the vehicle. Good briefly reversed, then began driving forward and to the right (away from him and into traffic). As her vehicle passed him and turned away, Ross fired three shots into the SUV, striking her fatally (including in the head).
Accounts consistently indicate she was maneuvering **away** from the agent, not toward him in a way that caused contact. The vehicle later crashed into a parked car after she was shot, but there is no report of it hitting or striking Ross himself.
Federal officials (DHS/ICE/Trump administration) claimed Good "weaponized her vehicle" and attempted to run over agents (labeling it potential "domestic terrorism" or self-defense justification), but independent video breakdowns and expert analyses contradict this, showing no such attempt or contact. Wikipedia's summary (sourced from reports) explicitly states Ross fired "as her vehicle passed him, turning away from him."
No credible sources describe any physical contact between the car and the agent before or during the shooting. The controversy centers on whether the shooting was justified, not on any actual vehicle-agent collision.
Did Renee good’s car make contact at all with the federal agent who shot her?
**No, Renee Good's car did not make contact with the federal agent (ICE officer Jonathan Ross) who shot her.**
Multiple sources, including video analyses from outlets like The New York Times, ABC News, CNN, The Washington Post, and CBS News, describe the incident on January 7, 2026, in Minneapolis. Good was in her SUV, which was stopped perpendicular to the street. Ross approached and positioned himself at the front-left of the vehicle. Good briefly reversed, then began driving forward and to the right (away from him and into traffic). As her vehicle passed him and turned away, Ross fired three shots into the SUV, striking her fatally (including in the head).
Accounts consistently indicate she was maneuvering **away** from the agent, not toward him in a way that caused contact. The vehicle later crashed into a parked car after she was shot, but there is no report of it hitting or striking Ross himself.
Federal officials (DHS/ICE/Trump administration) claimed Good "weaponized her vehicle" and attempted to run over agents (labeling it potential "domestic terrorism" or self-defense justification), but independent video breakdowns and expert analyses contradict this, showing no such attempt or contact. Wikipedia's summary (sourced from reports) explicitly states Ross fired "as her vehicle passed him, turning away from him."
No credible sources describe any physical contact between the car and the agent before or during the shooting. The controversy centers on whether the shooting was justified, not on any actual vehicle-agent collision.
Grok may be the best, but it’s still shite. It is constantly citing AP, PBS, CNN, NYT, WaPo, and “fact checks”.
quote:
These are all legitimate misuses of the justice department. You'll get no argument from me on that note.
Where was the exodus?
Why is it happening now?
I’ll bet you know.
Popular
21
