Started By
Message

Just got done reading Rick Atkinson's book about WWII in both Sicily and Italy...

Posted on 11/8/25 at 6:33 am
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69103 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 6:33 am
Finished reading it a few days ago and have come to the conclusion that the war in Italy was a complete and total waste of time, a vanity product of the British - particularly Winston Churchill - that was run by politicians and not by the military. I think Mark Clark gets an undeserved bad reputation though I can understand why he is criticized for his anti-British paranoia and his blatant refusal to follow orders during the battle that led to the capture of Rome.

While some historians have gone on to justify our campaign in Italy, saying that it diverted resources away from western Europe and the Eastern Front, I feel like they were ultimately negligible. Germany had but 22 divisions facing off against us in Italy, compared to the 60+ that remained in France and the low countries and the 130+ that remained on the Eastern Front. The fighting in Italy became a slog that was very similar to the fighting on the Western Front in World War I. The Fifth and Eighth armies could have been utilized elsewhere.
Posted by tigerjjs
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2006
1360 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 6:36 am to
Book board?
Posted by choppadocta
Louisiana
Member since May 2014
2381 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 6:38 am to
What was the name of the book?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69103 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 6:39 am to
quote:

What was the name of the book?



The Day of Battle: The War in Sicily and Italy, 1943-1944.
Posted by choppadocta
Louisiana
Member since May 2014
2381 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 6:43 am to
Okay that's part of his trilogy. I read that a while back it was okay. I think he overused the term "coalc scuttle helmet" while describing the German headwear a few too many times. I thought maybe this was a new book.
Posted by Boss13
Mobile
Member since Oct 2016
1809 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 6:48 am to
quote:

Finished reading it a few days ago and have come to the conclusion that the war in Italy was a complete and total waste of time, a vanity product of the British


Easy thing to say in 2025. Not so much so when your making the decision in 1944 and you are planning D-Day.

Since we are doing that, why did we even invade Europe? The Soviets were going to win it.
This post was edited on 11/8/25 at 6:51 am
Posted by jbgleason
Bailed out of BTR to God's Country
Member since Mar 2012
19755 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 6:53 am to
quote:

why did we even invade Europe? The Soviets were going to win it.


You wanted to let the Soviets control all of Europe?
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69103 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 6:53 am to
quote:

Easy thing to say in 2025.


It was also what the U.S. high command was saying in 1943 when the British began pushing for an invasion of mainland Italy. Guys like Marshall and King always were of the mind that Sicily and Italy were sideshows and that the main effort should have been focused on France. However, the British were much too timid and it took us compromising with them on Italy for them to agree to a cross channel invasion of France in 1944.
Posted by Macavity92
Member since Dec 2004
6213 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 7:27 am to
Read Allies at War. You may change your mind.
Posted by willymeaux
Member since Mar 2012
4871 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 7:38 am to
Uh, you do realize after the invasion of Sicily. The Italian king ousted Mussolini and Italy switched sides? Then the Germans had to invade and occupy Italy to set up their own puppet government, tying up manpower and resources, that could’ve been used in France or the eastern front.
Posted by SoFla Tideroller
South Florida
Member since Apr 2010
38490 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 7:44 am to
quote:

Easy thing to say in 2025. Not so much so when your making the decision in 1944 and you are planning D-Day.


George Marshall thought it was a waste of time in '43. Churchill had one aim, and one aim only: the preservation of the British Empire. He was willing to sacrifice every American life if that's what it took. All of the British possessions in the Med and Middle East were why he kept pushing the "soft underbelly" strategy. He opposed the Normandy invasion. It basically took George C. Marshall threatening to break the alliance to get him to acquiesce.

Basically, Churchill was a strategic and operational buffoon.
Posted by wahoocs
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2004
24466 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 7:50 am to
quote:

You wanted to let the Soviets control all of Europe?


That’s not what he’s saying.

He’s attempting to tell you that the outcome of the war would be much different without Germany divided on fronts
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
31568 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 8:10 am to
quote:

Mark Clark


Former president of the Citadel. The student union is named after him.
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
69103 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 8:37 am to
quote:

Then the Germans had to invade and occupy Italy to set up their own puppet government, tying up manpower and resources, that could’ve been used in France or the eastern front.


It tied up 22 divisions. Not many in the grand scheme of things.
Posted by gizmothepug
Louisiana
Member since Apr 2015
8467 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 9:02 am to
Netflix has a decent miniseries called The Liberator that follows an American unit through Italy, it’s animated, but it’s not bad.
Posted by bigpapamac
Mobile, AL
Member since Oct 2007
22529 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 9:14 am to
A common theme in his trilogy that I wasn’t fully aware of was just the insane amount of infighting and politicking among the Allied high command. Seems like a lot of lives could’ve been saved and the war in Europe won more efficiently if American and British generals could’ve gotten on the same page, which perhaps in hindsight was never going to happen.
Posted by bigjoe1
Member since Jan 2024
1393 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 9:54 am to
Another thing to consider is, by taking Italy the 15th AF was able to establish a series of bases around Foggia in SE Italy and bring the oil refineries at Ploesti into bomber range as well as all of eastern Europe plus, Austria and Southern Germany. The Luftwaffe had to devote significant air assets to defend these targets giving the 8th AF some much needed relief.
Then, when the invasion of southern France kicked off the Germans were unable to reinforce troops in France.
All in all, i think it was worth it.
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
10998 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 10:09 am to
It's the middle book in a trilogy he has written. The first is about North Africa, and the third is the war in western Europe.
Knox Co TN library has all three.
Posted by Champagne
Sabine Free State.
Member since Oct 2007
53128 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 10:15 am to
I'm not sure that it was a "waste" as you say, but, it is clear to me that the Med Front was the only European Front that the Axis "Won" in that they did induce a bit of a Stalemate.

The Eastern and Western Fronts were clear Allied "Wins".
Posted by LA Lightning
Member since Jun 2023
622 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 11:13 am to
quote:

A common theme in his trilogy that I wasn’t fully aware of was just the insane amount of infighting and politicking among the Allied high command. Seems like a lot of lives could’ve been saved and the war in Europe won more efficiently if American and British generals could’ve gotten on the same page, which perhaps in hindsight was never going to happen.


I am currently reading Stephen Ambrose's "D-Day", which details much of the conflict among the British and American commanders and political leaders and the amount of arm-twisting that Eisenhower had to engage in to achieve a substantial agreement on plans and who would be in command of what.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram