Started By
Message

re: Do you believe a city of 563,000 can have a voter turnout of 89%?

Posted on 5/7/24 at 1:48 pm to
Posted by PUB
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2017
18307 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 1:48 pm to
Thousands of people are in jail for standing around protesting that the election was stolen.
And how many protestors physically attacked, let alone killed, anybody at the building?
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68181 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 1:50 pm to

A vote and a ballot are not the same thing.
Posted by Jspaspa3303
Member since Jun 2020
2401 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

Mail in with harvesting. Yes.


Even doing that they still never got to 89% . More like filling out the ballot without someone’s knowledge and submitting it . YES .
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
96418 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 2:00 pm to
I would have POSSIBLY believed it for Obama in 2008.

Not Slow Joe in 2020.
Posted by chili pup
Member since Sep 2011
2795 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

I would have POSSIBLY believed it for Obama in 2008.

Not Slow Joe in 2020


Same here. Republicans did not have anyone worth a schite running for President 2008-2012. Romney is just not likeable.
This post was edited on 5/7/24 at 2:09 pm
Posted by Giantkiller
the internet.
Member since Sep 2007
20443 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Most secure election my arse.



Hmmm.. Sounds like the Republicans should do something about this. Before 2024 gets into high gear...

Oh wait.


Posted by SeeeeK
some where
Member since Sep 2012
28114 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 2:10 pm to
Zero point zero chance
Posted by Deuces
The bottom
Member since Nov 2011
12435 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 2:36 pm to
I know my town of 45k had like a 46% turnout for the mayor race.

I’m not sure about the difference in enthusiasm in presidential races, but that’s a sharp contrast.
Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
13516 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

If you calculate Wisconsin's turnout of voters compared to voting age population it was normal compared with the majority of the country in 2020.


Uh, bullshite. The average voting was less than 60% in 2016, it skyrocketed by 21 million votes in 2020, to 66% largely due to the "ballots that were dumped" (they were never sent out nor harvested, but dumped in boxes).

Nice try though....do better.
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
72937 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 2:48 pm to
normal voter turnout pre covid was 67%

the fact we had all this shite in the 90s and 100 percentiles proves they cheated their arse off
Posted by MightyYat
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2009
24515 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 2:49 pm to
The probabilities on that has to be off the freaking charts.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
29989 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 2:54 pm to
quote:

Mail in with harvesting. Yes.


If democrats are able to work that hard then they don’t need welfare.

Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
4360 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 2:58 pm to
quote:

The average voting was less than 60% in 2016, it skyrocketed by 21 million votes in 2020, to 66% largely due to the "ballots that were dumped" (they were never sent out nor harvested, but dumped in boxes).


How do you know that the increase was due to dumped ballots? Why was turnout up in states that don't have mail in voting, in states without ballot boxes and in states where Democrats would have no reason to cheat? Turnout was up in all 50 states.

You can compare states by turnout here. LINK

Turnout in Wisconsin was 67% in 2016 and 72% in 2020. Wisconsin has ranked in the top 5 in voter turnout every presidential election since 2000. There's nothing suspicious about turnout in Wisconsin unless you carry that suspicion to the entire country.
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29678 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

Wisconsin has ranked in the top 5 in voter turnout every presidential election since 2000.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45372 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 3:56 pm to
quote:

Mail in with harvesting. Yes.

quote:

I still believe many are too lazy to do that.


They are.

That’s why the Democrats and their NGOs, funded with your tax dollars, get their names and fill out the ballots for them and send them in with a forged or even no signature.

Cool, huh?
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68915 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 3:56 pm to
When you mail a ballot to everyone then its easy for someone to fill out a bunch and put them in Facebook drop boxes.


Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140718 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

If democrats are able to work that hard then they don’t need welfare.


Apparently being a commie instigator/protestor/activist is a profession now.
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23818 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 4:38 pm to
If you make it real easy to vote and send ballots to everyone, yes, you can have very high participation.

Why do republicans hate voter participation?
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140718 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 4:40 pm to
Why do you pieces of shite love illegals and calling men women?
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
23818 posts
Posted on 5/7/24 at 4:42 pm to
quote:

Why do you pieces of shite love illegals and calling men women?

I don't think you've ever displayed an actual idea.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram