Started By
Message

re: The Fani Willis prosecution of Trump just went up in smoke.

Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:04 pm to
Posted by lsufan1971
Zachary
Member since Nov 2003
18378 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:04 pm to
That whole I’m not on trial statement might be a ruh roh
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
7103 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

And no one will give a shite once hes re-elected




It is sad you think Trump is going to be reelected. How gullible can you be?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
147389 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:12 pm to
this can't be, she got some diversity racial queen award and said she would keep fighting until orange man goes to prison. because orange man is bad.

orange man should file a discrimination defamation charge against orange people.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
14262 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:17 pm to
quote:

In what way are these not "real" convictions? At least 3 of them were lawyers


After what we’ve all witnessed over the last 4 years with LE going after Trump and anyone in his orbit….including what recently happened in NY….with all sorts of bullshite allegations….you’ll have to forgive us for not seeing any of these plea deals as anything more than trying to get out of the way before being bankrupted by FedCo.

PARTICULARLY, after watching Dem after Dem skate in much more serious “oversights” because of reasons.

With all of the corruption in DC, I can not remember ever seeing such an organized legal assault from multiple angles against any politician ever….especilly a presidential candidate. It’s chilling.
This post was edited on 2/23/24 at 4:20 pm
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76552 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:18 pm to
Thoughts on what I posted a page back about a motion to dismiss based on prosecutorial misconduct?
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
361 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

Removing the prosecutor doesn't mean the underlying case disappears.


They had to hire a personal injury lawyer to prosecute the case. No other lawyer with a shred of professional dignity would touch that case. The scheme was the white house paid them basically to commit exactly what you see, professional suicide.

They're done
Posted by lake chuck fan
westlake
Member since Aug 2011
9257 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

It theoretically could, but that's largely irrelevant. Trump winning the election shouldn't prevent GA from prosecuting him.


It obvious these charges are bullshite already, do you think the state would be interested in continuing such a hoax?
He'll win on appeal anyway, why would GA want to continue the bad publicity?
Posted by McChowder
Hammond
Member since Dec 2006
5253 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:21 pm to
This should at least open the door for the judge to review the text messages *in camera* that were supposed to occur this week.
This post was edited on 2/23/24 at 4:38 pm
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76552 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:22 pm to
In Camera, it's latin
This post was edited on 2/23/24 at 4:23 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423536 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

No other lawyer with a shred of professional dignity would touch that case.

I think we know why he got the contract.

quote:

The scheme was the white house paid them basically to commit exactly what you see, professional suicide.

Their suicide had literally nothing to do with the merits of the case, good or bad.

It's just your typical political funding grift for friends and family. She got her side piece work and publicity.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46358 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:26 pm to
It's almost like Big Fani and Wade thought the Bureaucratic State Skunks in DC were going to cleanup their communication footprints.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423536 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Thoughts on what I posted a page back about a motion to dismiss based on prosecutorial misconduct?


I doubt that would survive unless some REALLY incriminating texts came up. Even then, the convictions give a basis of legitimacy they can always lean on.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101673 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:28 pm to
quote:

It's almost like Big Fani and Wade thought the Bureaucratic State Skunks in DC were going to cleanup their communication footprints.


It's slips like this that let us in on the fact that they are not some sort of omniscient unbreakable well oiled machine that a lot people seem to fear they are.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30276 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:33 pm to
Very true words. And there are many, many such instances, however a good number of folks fail to acknowledge them.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423536 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

It's slips like this that let us in on the fact that they are not some sort of omniscient unbreakable well oiled machine that a lot people seem to fear they are.

I think this decreases the chance of this big federal conspiracy in the first place.

No way the Biden admin would not have vetted this simple fact.

This is just plays out like your typical government grift rather than this huge conspiracy.
Posted by Y.A. Tittle
Member since Sep 2003
101673 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

No way the Biden admin would not have vetted this simple fact.


I disagree. They've probably got so many tentacles out there trying to get a hold on this stuff, there will be plenty of unvetted "simple facts" that slip through.
Posted by SemperFiDawg
Member since Sep 2014
2282 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

Probably could have another DA take them up but they were always bullshite charges and Willis’ pet project. Hopefully nobody else is deranged enough to carry this torch.


There's only about 4 more counties in Georgia capable of taking on the case. 99% don't have the human and financial resources. One of those, maybe Clayton county, has already declined so that only leaves 2-3 with the necessary capabilities. As of now, not one of those 2-3 have voiced a will to pursue it.
Posted by fwtex
Member since Nov 2019
1971 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

They won't.

The prosecutor appointed to replace her office may not be as excited to proceed, however.


There is a whole new set motions that will be filed if the judge rules against Fani. First will be to nullify the grand jury because it tainted by the same ethics or Fani and Wade. If the argument is they are profiting from the trial, well the grand jury was the impetus for the trial so it to is open for question.

This post was edited on 2/23/24 at 5:13 pm
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
140741 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 5:15 pm to
quote:

will to pursue it.


No sane person would be willing to step into this mess after all this. Hopefully every other option declines.
Posted by Nonetheless
Luka doncic = goat
Member since Jan 2012
33007 posts
Posted on 2/23/24 at 5:17 pm to
its no coincidence that every prosecutor on trump's cases are either corrupt or incompetent.
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram