re: Lady stays in Airbnb for over a year, doesn’t pay rent, wants 100k to move out

Same here

quote:

---

"This is a malicious smear campaign about a tenant who did not do the things Jovanovic is telling the public she did," he continued. "[Jovanovic has] not disclosed that he agreed to a long-term lease with the tenant outside of the Airbnb platform. It was never a 6 month lease."

---

what are the odds they were fricking at some point?

Burn it down!

quote:

---

I dont understand why is it so hard for the legal system to protect property owners from garbage people like this.

---

Because to these fricked up individuals, you either dont own the property or should not be allowed to own it

You are just taking up their oxygen with your hard world

Just wait until she leaves the home to get groceries or any reason. Change the doors/locks, lock windows, put up no trespassing signs, throw all her junk to the street. Why is that so difficult?

What is a squatters rights to subletting? Why couldn’t the owner just allow someone else to move in?

Or the owner have a friend brake a Utility line. How does a squatter have a right to get that fixed? A squatter can legally force an owner to fix something?

This country is so fricked. Within the first week a sheriff’s deputy should’ve gone in there and tossed her arse in the street. Case closed.

The legal system itself is not set up that great to protect property owners.

It’s like a 50/50 type situation.

Someone can’t just show up and destroy things but there are loop holes to where if someone peacefully sets up a tent in your front yard, there is nothing you can do about it

quote:

---

Sell the place and have the new owners evict her as she would have no contract with them.

---

I don't think that's how it works

quote:

---

But she's allowed to live there?

---

I took that as (and I could be wrong), certified for STR occupancy and the author was just bad (like most media today).

So, California has a law that requires you to have a specific cause for eviction.

I believe non-payment is one of those causes.

However, non-payment doesn't apply if the property isn't certified/approved for rental occupancy.

So now non-payment isn't available.

So it's somewhat like a loophole.

Also, to clarify (since people are so bad at message boards today), me explaining what I think the ruling is does not mean that I'm defending either the law or ruling.