- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: United States of Hydration Breaks vs Pair of Gays | World Cup Group D | 8pm CT (FOX)
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:08 pm to DonJuanDaMiles
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:08 pm to DonJuanDaMiles
I am in shock. We have never looked that good
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:08 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:If it expires in the middle of an attack they let it finish, and that’s even if they haven’t decided to add more on for things that happened in stoppage time.
They stopped playing after the last goal. You're telling me that he scored that goal on the very last second of the game?
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:08 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
So why didn't the game stop at 97:00? There was 7 minutes of extra time. 90:00 + 7:00 = 97:00, no? They just play till someone feels like calling it a day?
Time added on (stoppage time) is a minimum number of minutes to be added. It’s not a firm number.
Don’t feel bad that it makes no sense; as a referee, I have to remind coaches of the same thing - that time added on is a minimum number. They still don’t get it.
This post was edited on 6/12/26 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:08 pm to TigerFanatic99
As a reminder, if you have any Italian friends, please send them a note that the USA has scored 4 more 2026 World Cup goals than they will.
This post was edited on 6/12/26 at 10:09 pm
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:08 pm to G The Tiger Fan
quote:maybe we should explain it to him in rasslin terms g
I don't know what to tell you but that's the way it is.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:09 pm to G The Tiger Fan
I'm not trying to be combative, just seems ripe for corruption in a sport led by an organization that isn't exactly known for being squeaky clean and full of integrity.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:09 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
OK, so the clock really is just a suggestion, not an actual rule. They can subjectively decide to let them play longer just based on how one team is flowing at the moment.
Yes. I’ve seen +7 go 12 minutes in certain games.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:10 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
I'm not trying to be combative, just seems ripe for corruption in a sport led by an organization that isn't exactly known for being squeaky clean and full of integrity.
Yes, the US gets fricked on the reg with stoppage time
Losing… 2 minutes
Winning… 8 minutes
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:10 pm to Pedro
Rasslin rules are definitely more strict and the refs rarely let anything slide.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:10 pm to VADawg
quote:
Off the top of my head, this is the first time the USA has won a World Cup game by multiple goals since Dos a Cero in 2002
And haven’t won our opener since ‘02…… just saying
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:11 pm to BDPops85
So with this new format, is having a +3 goal differential through the first game basically guarantees us advancing right?
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:11 pm to BDPops85
quote:
And haven’t won our opener since ‘02…… just saying
The US got the Ghana monkey off their back (for lack of a better prase) to open the 2014 WC
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:11 pm to BDPops85
Won the opener in Brasil in ‘14 2-1 against Ghana. “It’s John Brooks, it’s John Brooks!”
This post was edited on 6/12/26 at 10:12 pm
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:12 pm to TigerFanatic99
There has been rumor of corruption in FIFA and international soccer, I've heard.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:12 pm to St. Pete Tiger
+3 goal difference is massive. Really an ideal start (even if short of absolutely perfect) 
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:12 pm to BDPops85
Too drunk to text too much. Wes was fricking fantastic. Running hard as frick until the end..........he fricking showed out.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:12 pm to OleVaught14
quote:
So with this new format, is having a +3 goal differential through the first game basically guarantees us advancing right?
Yes, unless we have an epic meltdown.
The Guardian football podcast was discussing this with a different group and said 3 points and a 0 G/D basically guarantees you advancement
Posted on 6/12/26 at 10:12 pm to Floyd Dawg
quote:
Won the opener in Brasil in ‘14 2-1 against Ghana. “It’s John Brooks, it’s John Brooks!”
"By multiple goals"
Popular
Back to top


1













