Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:31368
Registered on:7/25/2006
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Jim Schwanke’s hitting philosophy

Roids

re: As the foxes burn

Posted by MOT on 9/15/26 at 4:06 pm to
They owe Leeds money for cheating their way to auto promotion in 2024 imo.
There’s no way Kansas can stick with this QB right?
I was completely wrong.

I said there would be no punishment and just a strongly worded statement, but they’re so twisted they don’t even have the standing to do that.

re: SEC Meeting Outcome Prediction Thread

Posted by MOT on 9/10/26 at 2:29 pm to
No penalties
No punishment
One strongly worded email/press release/statement

re: Can somebody explain Bediako to me

Posted by MOT on 9/9/26 at 8:41 am to
Didn’t they go to great lengths a couple weeks ago to say it wasn’t a “new rule” regarding pro players, and they were only reiterating what was already in place?
0%

Unless they have evidence of some major violation that they haven’t leaked to Dellenger yet (which is unlikely).
quote:

A lot of what you list would be anecdotal.
It wouldn’t be anecdotal to prove that the action by the SEC was taken against LSU for their threat of playing ineligible players while other schools are actively playing, or have played, ineligible players without the same punishment.
I’m not even sure he wins if the SEC gets the ruling they want to “enforce their rules”. Because then they will have to explain why they’re still allowing other ineligible players to remain active.
quote:

but they still want a ruling on their request for a declaratory judgment on how they have a right to enforce their own rules.
Good, I hope they get it so LSU can ask them why they’re still allowing so many ineligible players to remain active under court orders without severely punishing the offending schools.

re: Interesting take from Murrill

Posted by MOT on 9/8/26 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

they vote us out we don't have much recourse.
:lol:
I decided to watch for a few minutes to see what talking points they would repeat and they were talking extensively about Rousse tweeting a video of him dancing on the field Saturday night.

That was enough for me.

re: Lane is forcing the NCAAs hand

Posted by MOT on 9/5/26 at 6:02 am to
quote:

I believe Lane is doing this to force some sort of leadership to step up and enforce rules with NIL, eligibility, etc. Nobody in the NCAA leadership has done anything except sit on there asses while the sport we love burns down.
The NCAA had very clear NIL rules and always enforced them. Then a bunch of bleeding heart fans, lawmakers, and courts decided to give you the chaos we have today. This is what a lot of you wanted, own it.
Does anyone else remember that year where the key or “paint” didn’t have any color, and everything else inside the three point line was purple? Probably early 90’s Shaq timeframe, but was interesting to say the least.
quote:

They can change their bylaws and say any team with players not approved by the NCAA or their Conferences are not eligible to be in the selection process and participate in the playoff. Its coming
Thats going to cover more players and teams than just LSU and the few it’s involved with.

re: Tom Mars Again

Posted by MOT on 9/4/26 at 10:12 am to
quote:

When a person or organization joins a private association, they agree to follow its rules in exchange for the benefits of membership. Courts treat the bylaws as a valid contract.
I mean the players (person within his context) voluntarily agreed to follow the rules regarding the lack of NIL and pay for play, but that didn’t stop them from being able to find enough sympathetic lawmakers, courts, and judges to set us down this path.
quote:

I think the obviously bigger story is a power 5 conference being flagrantly biased toward one of its founding members.
It doesn’t matter what you, I, or we as the LSU fan base thinks.

The bigger story to everyone else is the intentionally exaggerated “LSU is getting NFL players on its roster” angle, so they are adding as much fuel to the fire as possible.
quote:

What I don’t understand is why there is blatantly selective coverage by the media
Because it makes for a “better”, more polarizing headline/story.