- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FIFA to examine 64-team World Cup expansion before 2030 tournament
Posted on 7/13/26 at 3:55 pm to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 7/13/26 at 3:55 pm to RLDSC FAN
This is more likely than people want to admit since it would only add 24 matches (all group stage). The bigger jump was 32 to 48 teams which added 40 matches (24 group + 16 knockout)
Most importantly, the path to the final is still 3 group + 5 knockout
Even Pot 1 teams would prefer this to 48. Easier group stages and R32s plus less wear and tear since most Matchday 3s would turn into full lineup rotation because they'll almost always be sitting on 6 points
It's gonna happen baws. Just a matter of 2030 or 2034
On the plus side, it increases our hosting frequency considerably because we're going to be the only country that can reliably host the damn thing
Most importantly, the path to the final is still 3 group + 5 knockout
Even Pot 1 teams would prefer this to 48. Easier group stages and R32s plus less wear and tear since most Matchday 3s would turn into full lineup rotation because they'll almost always be sitting on 6 points
It's gonna happen baws. Just a matter of 2030 or 2034
On the plus side, it increases our hosting frequency considerably because we're going to be the only country that can reliably host the damn thing
This post was edited on 7/13/26 at 10:06 pm
Posted on 7/13/26 at 4:15 pm to SabiDojo
quote:tbf if we expanded to 64 teams for this World Cup the most laughable nations included would’ve still been Curaçao and Uzbekistan
Me in 2030 watching Honduras vs Vatican City:
Other smaller nations but still serviceable that would’ve qualified based on WCQs and mocked would’ve been Northern Ireland, Kosovo… otherwise no issue with Italy, Bolivia, Jamaica, Bolivia, Gabon, Cameroon, Ukraine, etc.
Point is it’s not going to be any more watered down than it is already. ***as long as a 2nd auto-qualifying spot isn’t given to Oceania. We don’t need to see Tahiti or New Caledonia getting shellacked by a dozen goals. Hell I still remember watching Saudi Arabia getting shellacked 8-0 by Germany live in 2002. Haven’t seen anything as bad since anyway including this year with 48 teams
Posted on 7/13/26 at 9:13 pm to Who_Dat_Tiger
after having a lot of fun watching Cape Verde this world cup I say bring on more teams. it wouldn't change knockouts and we wouldn't have the dumb 3rd place team stuff.
Posted on 7/13/26 at 9:34 pm to RLDSC FAN
So San Marino might have a chance!
Posted on 7/14/26 at 4:53 pm to RLDSC FAN
Somehow Italy will still frick up & fail to qualify
Posted on 7/15/26 at 9:04 am to Kansas City King
quote:
Pointless. Even after expanding to 32 teams, the top 4 pre-tournament favorites all made it to the final four. Boooring
That means you’re getting the best possible semis and Final
quote:
*as long as a 2nd auto-qualifying spot isn’t given to Oceania
It’s the WORLD cup, not the European and South American Cup. If it was me, during a World Cup, I would have invited every nation in the world to come and play friendlies even if they didn’t qualify just so they could soak in the atmosphere…
This post was edited on 7/15/26 at 9:12 am
Popular
Back to top

0






