Started By
Message

re: Why do old conservatives get mad when you tell them that SSI is welfare

Posted on 11/2/17 at 4:33 pm to
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30454 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 4:33 pm to
SS is a social program and it employs forms of means testing. You have to also look at it historically in that people started receiving benefits at the start that never paid in. It depends on your definition of welfare but it meets many standards to be called welfare, it is certainly a social safety net. Think of it this way if you worked and paid taxes all your life but lose your job and end up on some welfare programs you could still say you worked to pay into the system BUT it is still welfare. SS is not an individual trust account and from most intellectual points of view it is a form of welfare, but if it makes people feel better to think they never receive welfare then they can certainly define it how they like.
Posted by Themole
Palatka Florida
Member since Feb 2013
5557 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

my response is: not my fault that you were irrational and trusted a failed system


Do you pay into social security now?
Posted by Aristo
Colorado
Member since Jan 2007
13292 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 4:56 pm to
How was social security sold to the American people? Do you know?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

What? Welfare recipients don't pay anything

irrelevant from the POV of the person paying for the welfare

even ignoring that...tons of people get more SS than they "paid in". same issue
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

Essentially you are saying we are all being forced to buy Puerto Rican bonds. Those bonds are currently paying on the coupon. Odds are though, current purchase will see little ROI d/t default.

I get that.
But any ROI after purchase of those bonds is not welfare.

i'm talking about the structure of the program

if it requires a constant influx of money from people who aren't participating in the spoils, then it's welfare

just because it's more onerous than section 8 by requiring a little skin in the game, doesn't totally transform the nature of the program

the fact that it's a forced payment that redistributes wealth is enough, for me
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
476619 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

Do you pay into social security now?

yes and i fully support its full, immediate repeal

i also understand the odds of me receiving the benefits my grandparents did, adjusted for inflation especially, are about 0%
Posted by MeatCleaverWeaver
Member since Oct 2013
22175 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

At least once a week, when I help out on the sales floor at our dealership


And you “argue” with them about SSI? Prospective customers? Really?
Posted by Themole
Palatka Florida
Member since Feb 2013
5557 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 5:22 pm to
quote:

yes and i fully support its full, immediate repeal

i also understand the odds of me receiving the benefits my grandparents did, adjusted for inflation especially, are about 0%


So did I, for 49 years. I once told my Bosses, I didn't want to pay into Social Security. They told me I didn't have to. I just couldn't work for them or anyone else that was charged with withholding taxes for the federal government or we would all be unemployed.

I created a small, cash only business (after hours and weekends from my real job) that offset their (The Feds) with holdings by a large margin and let bygones be bygones.

You don't like paying into the system, stop. You will not work anymore for an established business though.

We paid in because we were forced!
Posted by MississippiLSUfan
Brookhaven
Member since Oct 2005
12591 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 5:25 pm to
quote:

Pay me what I've put into it with interest and Im happy.


Yep. Pay me every penny, with interest, since 1975. Pay everyone everything that they’ve forcibly taken. Then end the program the day that the checks are mailed out. That should make the younger people happy. Sure would make me happy.

If you didn’t pay in or only paid a little, good for you. You didn’t get the arse reaming that some of us got. I have a retirement program and I’ll be fine either way. But frick the assholes that took my money to pay for “my retirement “.

I want every penny that they took. Every. fricking. Penny. I’m going to try to age like Benjamin fricking Button.

Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30454 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 5:26 pm to
quote:

How was social security sold to the American people? Do you know?


It was "sold" as social insurance in the 30s since the poverty rates were over 50% for senior citizens. Essentially just a welfare program to prevent predominately older people from a destitute life.
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134141 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 5:29 pm to
Your are a fricking idiot.
Posted by alatxtgr
The Nation of Texas
Member since Sep 2006
2404 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 5:32 pm to
Had the Congressmen and Congresswomen over the years not squandered SS monies taken in for pet projects and just banked the money drawing interest, we would not have to pay income taxes today, only the Social Security and we would more than likely be debt free as a nation...
Holy run-on I know, but you get the point....
Posted by doverstutts
Member since Jul 2017
1070 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 5:35 pm to
now, hopefully with jobs returning to america, the welfare state will be dissolved and these career "victims" will now have a place to work
Posted by L1C4
The Ville
Member since Aug 2017
16566 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 6:07 pm to
Listen you fricken punk, it's not welfare. The government takes it out of my paycheck. I worked for it. It's my money. So when you get a tax refund at the end of the year do you call that welfare?
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
79925 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 6:10 pm to
No. The money is forceably taken from you when you could have invested in in an index fund and done better. It's not welfare, it's payback of the government theft.
This post was edited on 11/2/17 at 6:11 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138866 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

if it requires a constant influx of money from people who aren't participating in the spoils, then it's welfare
It isn't though.

Look SFP, let's be clear. You and I both look at SS with a similar attitude. I would be happy for the program to be privatized. Returns would be far better for participants. But ROI and retirement security has almost nothing to do with construct of SS. ROI and retirement security are lipstick on the proverbial pig.

Step one to a faze out is for Americans to understand that.

SS is a mechanism to borrow from every working American (regardless of their approval) with a promise to incrementally return the money (nearly without interest) upon retirement. If an individual dies before full repayment . . . . tough! The government keeps the money.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138866 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 6:16 pm to
quote:

the fact that it's a forced payment that redistributes wealth is enough, for me
Except as I've pointed out, that truly is not the design.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95632 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

I want every penny that they took.


Look, I know you were misled and probably straight up lied to. I can't excuse that. But they weren't taking your money to save for your retirement. They were insurance premiums. And since it was the government and mandated (sound familiar? *cough* Obamacare *cough*) it was a tax. But, it wasn't a tax for "retirement" - it was a tax to guarantee a minimum income for old folks, disabled people and widows (women didn't work and weren't expected to for a long time - hell, not that long ago).

So, here we are. And there is nothing else to do about it.

However, it is welfare. Use the word "entitlement" if you feel better. Just don't pretend they won't be taking young people's money to pay your fairly generous benefit in just a few years (I must assume you're 58 to 61 - so just a few years away from the sweet life).

I'm a champion of the truth. Sorry, not sorry.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
56146 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

I'm a champion of the truth.


Well part of that truth is that we helped pay for our grandparents and parents SS income, so it's not like we're being treated special or something. We're just doing what those before us did.
Posted by Bham4Tide
In a Van down by the River
Member since Feb 2011
24684 posts
Posted on 11/2/17 at 6:33 pm to
What the hell is this?

You talking SSI or SSDI?

SSDI (Title II) is what we pay in to (you ever wonder what FICA is?) that if you ever become disabled or when you retire, you get a portion of that back. It comes (after a qualifying period) with Medicare.

SSI is for those with disabilities who do not have enough credits built into the system to receive SSDI. It is a form of welfare - paid for by general tax dollars. It comes with Medicaid.

Get informed dude.

Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram