- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are there flock cameras all over NYC, but not the UWS?
Posted on 8/12/26 at 10:09 am to Willie Stroker
Posted on 8/12/26 at 10:09 am to Willie Stroker
quote:Yes, in some cases, they were. And it's not as if those other cases were reasonable.
None of those were for 2 people standing too close to each other as depicted in the cartoon.
Bend over harder.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 10:28 am to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
if you can’t figure out what UWS means here, I don’t know what to tell you
I’ve been there plenty of times and have traveled more than probably 99% of the posters here. I’m not exactly a “bubble” person.
It still took me half a minute to figure out the context.
Also, Flock cameras are not in NYC at all. These are NYPD.
So, in general, this just seems like more half-truth cut and paste outrage porn.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 10:33 am to Chemcorp158
quote:
We should all just ignore the quote and what it is saying about giving up freedoms for perceived safety because Ben Franklin was a man of his time and even if he changed his ways and became the president of the Pennsylvania abolition Society in 1787.
Exactly this.
So tired of these arguments where people use selective truths to make a point that the fuller picture completely counters.
It’s like the people argue that an ambiguous line in the 3rd verse of the Star Spangled Banner means the whole thing should be tossed because it’s a screed for slavery.
It’s lazy, manipulative, and just so damn tiring dealing with people who think this way.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 10:56 am to blueboy
quote:
Yes, in some cases, they were.
List them. Word of mouth? Or can you link it?
Posted on 8/12/26 at 10:57 am to GreatLakesTiger24
This map is wrong. I live on the UWS and there are NYPD cameras on Broadway, Amsterdam, and Columbus. They were approved by the city council and installed 2-3 years ago.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 11:57 am to GreatLakesTiger24
Per the Google search assistant when asked what demographic does UWS NY vote
Rules for thee, not for me.
quote:
The Upper West Side (UWS) of New York City tends to vote predominantly for Democratic candidates, reflecting its affluent and diverse population. In recent elections, areas with mostly Asian, Black, or Hispanic residents, including parts of the UWS, showed strong support for Democratic candidates like Zohran Mamdani.
Time
Wikipedia
Voting Demographics of the Upper West Side
Predominant Political Affiliation
The Upper West Side (UWS) of New York City is known for its strong support of Democratic candidates. This trend is influenced by the neighborhood's affluent and diverse population.
Key Demographic Groups
The voting patterns in the UWS reflect the following demographic characteristics:
Ethnic Diversity: The area has a significant population of Asian, Black, and Hispanic residents, who have shown strong support for Democratic candidates in recent elections.
Affluence: The UWS is an affluent neighborhood, which often correlates with higher voter turnout and support for progressive policies.
Recent Election Trends
In the most recent elections, candidates like Zohran Mamdani received substantial backing from UWS residents, particularly in precincts with higher concentrations of diverse ethnic groups. This trend indicates a consistent preference for Democratic leadership in the area.
Overall, the Upper West Side's demographic composition plays a crucial role in shaping its voting behavior, favoring candidates who align with progressive and Democratic values.
Rules for thee, not for me.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 12:08 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
What's you argument against businesses and shopping centers putting up cameras?
Just interested if you actually have thought this through.
Just interested if you actually have thought this through.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 12:41 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
I’ve been there plenty of times and have traveled more than probably 99% of the posters here. I’m not exactly a “bubble” person.
It still took me half a minute to figure out the context.
Also, Flock cameras are not in NYC at all. These are NYPD.
So, in general, this just seems like more half-truth cut and paste outrage porn.
You bring up a good point. I had seen the deflock.org map before and took it for granted that the ALPR cameras in NYC are part of the same network. But when you posted the part I bolded, I looked it up, and you are correct that NYPD (and NYC Dept of Transportation / DOT) maintain their own network, and don't contract with Flock... They are still ALPR cameras, but the distinction of different networks is worth knowing.
A few other thoughts (not so much in reply to you, Ag Zwin)...
I ended up going back into the deflock.org map, entered an NYC zip code, and panned around the city map. Some observations:
1) Location:
The vast majority of ALPR cameras are clustered around toll road areas.
a) A very large number are clustered around the Lincoln Tunnel (connects NYC to NJ).
b) There are a smaller number around other high traffic bridge and tunnel areas.
c) There is a significant line of cameras on every avenue along 59th St and 14th St, which is consistent with the tax (road toll) for every vehicle entering midtown that was implemented a year or so ago.
d) 23rd St has a lot. I'd guess this is because there is a dedicated bus lane and NYC tickets drivers who drive in these bus lane (they have signs warning that cameras are watching for this)...
e) There are a few random cameras here and there that do not have an obvious toll related reason... some are likely to be red light cameras.
f) On page 2, I speculated (based on tiny view of zoomed out map) that Madison Avenue shops might be the reason for UES cameras, but I was wrong. There are 4 along Lexington Avenue and one on 3rd Ave, and I don't have any ideas as to why these locations.
2. Ownership:
I only clicked on a dozen or so cameras. Only 2 of them were owned / maintained by NYPD. Most of them are maintained by NYC DOT or the transit authority (MTA)... which makes sense with regards to the cameras enforcing tolls (and probably red lights) / generating revenue for the city.
3. I saw the other flock thread about ALPR use for ICE, in which someone posted the same map as the OP and insinuated Jewish population being the reason for lack of cameras on the UWS.
I can't definitively say that is not the reason. But having lived here for 25 years and having lived on both the UES and UWS, I disagree. The UWS was historically a little more of a working man Jewish neighborhood, and the UES was historically a little more rich WASPy (like the Rockefellers, JP Morgan, etc), but the UES is still more prestigious, and you will find more Jewish billionaire finance guys like Bloomberg who have penthouses and townhouses in the UES. My wife and I have two daughters who attended elite private schools with significant Jewish populations, and in rubbing elbows with the parent bodies, the UES (The Primates of Park Avenue set) seems to have more money and influence.
Summary:
Most of the cameras are for tolls / traffic violations / generating profit. There are other neighborhoods like the West Village and Greenwich Village which have 0 cameras, and several that have maybe one or two.
I love a good CT, and I'm fully in agreement with many on this board on many topics (there is extensive election cheating, MSM is propaganda, the Left is increasingly insane, etc). The lack of cameras on the UWS, however, appears incidental... it just hasn't been prioritized / deemed profitable yet.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 1:06 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
Where in the US was it a crime to be standing too close to someone?
That sounds like a false talking point.
LOL, you must be joking. Either that or you were not living in the US during 2020.
There were numerous jurisdictions where people were fined or arrested for violating social distancing mandates, and a whole bunch of lawsuits filed in response to all that.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 1:10 pm to Stinger_1066
quote:
LOL, you must be joking. Either that or you were not living in the US during 2020.
There were numerous jurisdictions where people were fined or arrested for violating social distancing mandates, and a whole bunch of lawsuits filed in response to all that.
Show me a law or an instance where 2 people could not stand together in public as insinuated in the cartoon.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 1:11 pm to TheChosenOne
Is the joke that the upper west side is hasids or something
Posted on 8/12/26 at 1:22 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:
The cameras have been around for decades.
No the frick they haven’t. Not in the context they are now, recording when I go to work or grocery store. They’ve put up 10+ in my area in a year… none were here a year ago much less a decade. GTFO here with that shite.
This post was edited on 8/12/26 at 1:28 pm
Posted on 8/12/26 at 1:34 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:
Always love this quote with no context. Ben Franklin owned fking slaves and he is preaching about liberty
It’s called historical context, dipshit.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 1:44 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:frick you. I'm not doing a bunch of work for your bootlicker arse. Why don't you just google people arrested for violating social distancing?
List them.
Here's just one.
Monsey: 8 arrested for violating social distancing orders
And again, that's just one unjust situation out of many. But you want to be the world's fricking mama. Kill yourself.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 1:45 pm to epbart
quote:
upper west side (UWS)
Ah, that UWS.
I was thinking they were going to Unleash Wild Stallyns to herald in world peace.

This post was edited on 8/12/26 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 8/12/26 at 1:52 pm to blueboy
quote:
Here's just one. Monsey: 8 arrested for violating social distancing orders
8 people, not 2?
The cartoon was about 2.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 2:07 pm to Willie Stroker
Wrong again. The cartoon depicts 2 people talking about the issue.
You can do this dumbass song and dance all you like. You're never winning people over to your argument.
You can do this dumbass song and dance all you like. You're never winning people over to your argument.
Posted on 8/12/26 at 2:58 pm to Ag Zwin
quote:
Exactly this.
So tired of these arguments where people use selective truths to make a point that the fuller picture completely counters.
It’s like the people argue that an ambiguous line in the 3rd verse of the Star Spangled Banner means the whole thing should be tossed because it’s a screed for slavery.
It’s lazy, manipulative, and just so damn tiring dealing with people who think this way.
So you are saying his quote about liberty was also his state of mind and he changed it along with his thoughts on slavery and would have agreed flock cameras are needed
Posted on 8/12/26 at 3:02 pm to blueboy
quote:
your bootlicker arse
Im just going to assume now you people were all about defunding the police and installing prog DAs to not prosecute crime.
Popular
Back to top



1





