- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Where do you stand on this issue Re John Deere shop tool availability?
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:07 am to loogaroo
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:07 am to loogaroo
quote:
Back in the mid 90’s Deere came out with the CTS Rice combine. My buddy installed a CB radio in his. There is something like 9 miles of wire on it. After finding a hot wire, the radio worked, but when he cued the mic, the unloading auger would deploy.
The American way...
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:12 am to SlowFlowPro
JD will move production back from Mehico like Toyota soon to avoid tariffs.
There are work arounds developed by some in Eastern Europe.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:13 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Does the government have a right to tell American businesses how to operate their company? Deere’s methods have allowed a window of competing farm equipment to make inroads into their market share.
I think when someone buys something from a company that item is no longer the property of the company and the purchaser should be allowed to do whatever they desire to the item.
I am surprised that China has not come out with replacement computers for these tractors and a new interface for reading the data. Hell China probably built the computer and with their IP laws they already have the data so building an "aftermarket" computer should be easy.
I hate China but that would be a good move for them.
It would be similar to deleting a diesel. If it is yours you should be able to do whatever you want to it.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
THAT part is not anti-competitive; it's the market reality.
The reality, not that you have an actual clue being the poorly educated little dolt that you are, is in the fact companies like JD have worked to deny any aftermarket solutions including suing individual farmers for having the audacity to repair critical equipment that they outright own. They go so far as to threaten companies that supply individual components with lawsuits if they sell parts to anyone not licensed by the OEM. Not even proprietary parts either, parts like hydraulic pumps that are used by other OEM's where there is no reasonable expectation of exclusivity and certainly no safety or reliability issue at stake. Arguing against right-to-repair at any level is a brainless exercise, no surprise from you though...
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:18 am to Ailsa
in similar fashion, 2022 Chrysler going down the highway has a check engine light come on. I go to the operating manual and it sez take to dealer right away before damage. Dealer plugs in handheld and read out sez close gas fill cap tighter, Dealer charges 200 dollars for info.
Now there are about 3 different substantial computers on my Chrysler, and they could have one indicate loose fill cap instead of check engine light.
Its designed to support dealer ship billing at the owners expense
Now there are about 3 different substantial computers on my Chrysler, and they could have one indicate loose fill cap instead of check engine light.
Its designed to support dealer ship billing at the owners expense
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:25 am to alphaandomega
quote:
I am surprised that China has not come out with replacement computers for these tractors and a new interface for reading the data. Hell China probably built the computer and with their IP laws they already have the data so building an "aftermarket" computer should be easy.
You overestimate China's abilities here, they struggle to properly clone things at a much lower technical level than ECM's.
The issue at hand goes well beyond ECM's too, OEM's that require perpetual subscription schemes to access features will impact secondary sales of equipment. Many farmers can't afford a new machine, buying a used one then finding out you have to go back to the OEM to pay monthly fees to access needed functions would certainly be discouraging.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:25 am to alphaandomega
quote:I watched a You Tube of this very thing. They say you own the equipment but they license you the software. Catch 22
I think when someone buys something from a company that item is no longer the property of the company and the purchaser should be allowed to do whatever they desire to the item.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:27 am to Trevaylin
Some OEM's are getting to where to even to open the hood it requires a dealer-level scan tool. If things don't change then it will basically mean buying a new vehicle where even basic maintenance is entirely reliant on making an appointment with a local dealership.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:29 am to idlewatcher
Let the market decide. If its that bad then people will stop buying John Deere. If they don't then it isn't that bad.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:32 am to idlewatcher
Deere has done an amazing job of killing its brand in the last 15 or so years. They had the most loyal customer base I've ever seen locked down for generations -- people with money and ongoing need -- and they have driven so many away.
While all tractors have gone backwards in terms of durability and performance since our retarded govt enforced the 2014 EPA emissions standards, Deere leaned into greed and crapping on its customers.
While the larger farmers I know still use JD because they're so invested in the platform, many of the smaller farms around me have ditched them for Kubota, LS, and others. I'm still running a 50-year old Massey that just won't die. When it does, I will not buy a JD made after 2010 or so (when most of the computer crap and emissions nonsense started to intrude).
To me this issue hinges on JD's changing their policies after customers had invested millions in their equipment. It would be one thing to slowly phase in what they did, but it was basically an all-or-nothing offer to farmers who had very little time to adapt.
I don't know if that's illegal, but it's a shitty way to treat your customers.
Also, JD has been aggressive in going after farmers who've tried to hack their way around JD's computer lockouts.
So screw JD. I'd love for them to be displaced by competitors.
While all tractors have gone backwards in terms of durability and performance since our retarded govt enforced the 2014 EPA emissions standards, Deere leaned into greed and crapping on its customers.
While the larger farmers I know still use JD because they're so invested in the platform, many of the smaller farms around me have ditched them for Kubota, LS, and others. I'm still running a 50-year old Massey that just won't die. When it does, I will not buy a JD made after 2010 or so (when most of the computer crap and emissions nonsense started to intrude).
To me this issue hinges on JD's changing their policies after customers had invested millions in their equipment. It would be one thing to slowly phase in what they did, but it was basically an all-or-nothing offer to farmers who had very little time to adapt.
I don't know if that's illegal, but it's a shitty way to treat your customers.
Also, JD has been aggressive in going after farmers who've tried to hack their way around JD's computer lockouts.
So screw JD. I'd love for them to be displaced by competitors.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:38 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Deere’s methods have allowed a window of competing farm equipment to make inroads into their market share
The one dirty little secret about manufacturing is that some supplies are all from the same supplier sometimes even the goods themselves are built at 3rd party assembly lines and have different shifts working on different pieces of equipment but badged separately.
Engine, wheels, and mechanics are all the same, but the badging, color scheme, and computer may all be different.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 10:40 am to KemoSabe65
quote:
Try $750,000-$1,000,000 for picker or combine, some headers are $250,000.
And I could say the same thing about forestry equipment. Doesn’t change that there are also $300K machines that do different jobs (or similar jobs differently) in the same sector.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 11:54 am to Ag Zwin
I'm not defending Deere here at all but I didn't see the uproar when the Ford CEO came out a week ago and told people that they don't need to attempt to work of their Ford vehicles.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 12:01 pm to idlewatcher
This isn't just a john deere issue. It boils down to the whole right to repair political issues.
I am 100% for right to repair and John Deere is a big problem.
The right to repair issue boils down to if you buy a product then just like in all of history you should be allowed to fix it. If you are not allowed to fix it or alter it then you don't really own it.
John Deere, Apple, and a trillion other companies have forever made it so that you must go back to them for repairs.
Louis Rossman has a youtube channel that covers this issue a lot. Check it out.
I am 100% for right to repair and John Deere is a big problem.
The right to repair issue boils down to if you buy a product then just like in all of history you should be allowed to fix it. If you are not allowed to fix it or alter it then you don't really own it.
John Deere, Apple, and a trillion other companies have forever made it so that you must go back to them for repairs.
Louis Rossman has a youtube channel that covers this issue a lot. Check it out.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 12:04 pm to Clames
quote:
, is in the fact companies like JD have worked to deny any aftermarket solutions including suing individual farmers for having the audacity to repair critical equipment that they outright own. They go so far as to threaten companies that supply individual components with lawsuits if they sell parts to anyone not licensed by the OEM. Not even proprietary parts either, parts like hydraulic pumps that are used by other OEM's where there is no reasonable expectation of exclusivity and certainly no safety or reliability issue at stake. Arguing against right-to-repair at any level is a brainless exercise, no surprise from you though
You did not read what I wrote.
I'm describing a "right to repair" system with these proprietary components. It's still going to be prohibitively expensive due to the complexity of these modern systems.
I was specifically not describing the scenario you posted about.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 12:08 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
I watched a You Tube of this very thing. They say you own the equipment but they license you the software. Catch 22
And therein lies the rub.
If the market wants the advanced versions that require this software, they hamstring themselves into those products.
If the market wants simpler products without the advancements, a new producer will step in.
That is, until the federal government declares the proprietary nature of certain software (automobiles, specifically) a national security issue. Then RTR isn't an option and violating those regs would be major criminal actions.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 12:54 pm to Eurocat
quote:
cmon now use your head don't be such a purist.
This is where so many conservatives fall. They are so principled that they don't even realize what they are supporting.
By obediently supporting the "free market" without evaluating the results, people like the OP unwittingly support the "You will own nothing and like it" policy of the NWO/WEF.
Too many are OK with corporations controlling an item after it was purchased in the name of the "free market." At some point, you have to ask yourself if what you are supporting is truly beneficial or if you are only supporting it because of an ideology.
People who put all their faith in the "free market" are just giving more control to corporations. Then they will turn around and complain about the influence these corporations have over government policies while simultaneously fighting against any methods that can rein them in, all in the name of the "free market."
Too often, conservatives are so pure that they just shoot themselves in the foot.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 1:06 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
People who put all their faith in the "free market" are just giving more control to corporations.

Posted on 7/9/26 at 1:10 pm to idlewatcher
I saw something recently where you cannot even open the hood of a Mercedes-Benz only a dealer can do it
Posted on 7/9/26 at 1:39 pm to Diamondawg
quote:I have a compact Kubota. Personally, I think Kubota runs circles around John Deere in the compact space. But you can't beat the John Deere in the large tractor, combines, pickers, etc. That's why farmers put up with this aggravation that we are talking about. But, I think Case IH is making a push and making really good stuff. This stuff interests me so I watch or have watched a lot of You Tube shows (one series has a cute girl doing most of the work and talking) but I mostly see John Deere still but the reds are making a move.
Just buy red or orange and the green will come around eventually.
Popular
Back to top



1








