- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What a SCOTUS Gift: Refunding Tariff Money to Business Would Boost Economy
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:22 am to lsugolf1105
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:22 am to lsugolf1105
quote:
Yes, a refund
Good luck with that
Tariffs arent illegal clown
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:22 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
Whatever money they spent on tariffs, they already priced it into their products and sold them. Why the F would we refund them....unless they refund every customer who purchased from them
So are we admitting here that the tariffs did cause prices to rise on American consumers?
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:26 am to Timeoday
Every dollar printed and thrown at people
Awesome
Awesome
This post was edited on 2/22/26 at 11:07 am
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:34 am to lsugolf1105
quote:
It was illegally taken. Why would you not want to give refunds? Would you rather the government have that money versus American businesses
Yes, I would rather Trump distribute, than give it to companies that have ALREADY RECLAIMED IT THRU RAISING THEIR PRICES TO THEIR CUSTOMERS.
So yeah, why would they ask for something they passed on and collected already. If they do, their customers are entitled to refunds.
The net net is a ton of work, and should result in net zero gain for them.
So, lets take a fake example....best buy. They sell you a device which was raised 6% higher when tariffs hit. Across the country, they sell 50,000 of different products with raised tariffs. Sure , they can probably calculate what the tariffs cumulative total is. But they passed it on to consumers already. Well, they've either gotta refund every customer that amount, or face years of class action lawsuits from consumers, adding their names to suits, and fighting in court. All to end up with what should be, a net zero gain.....but 10s if millions in legal fees and brand name damage.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:35 am to Timeoday
Its a beautiful day in the neighborhood
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:35 am to ChatGPT of LA
So yeah. As a ceo I'd probably just move on, tariffs are still there under new ruling, so prices will remain steady anyway
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:46 am to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
I would rather Trump distribute, than give it to companies that have ALREADY RECLAIMED IT THRU RAISING THEIR PRICES TO THEIR CUSTOMERS.
So yeah, why would they ask for something they passed on and collected already. If they do, their customers are entitled to refunds.
So yes, we are admitting that tariffs raised prices on American consumers. Good to get that established.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:48 am to ragincajun03
Tariffs just got 5% higher. Melt more.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:51 am to Riverside
I'm actually good with the tariffs. You're merely ASSuming something from my statement, and we all know how those situations typically turn out.
I personally support tariffing countries that tariff us. I never understood why we just bent over and took it.
But that said...it seemed the overwhelming consensus from Trumpists was that the media was lying that American consumers would pay more because of tariffs. Now we have Kennedy and others talking about a refund. What is there to refund if prices didn't rise?
I personally support tariffing countries that tariff us. I never understood why we just bent over and took it.
But that said...it seemed the overwhelming consensus from Trumpists was that the media was lying that American consumers would pay more because of tariffs. Now we have Kennedy and others talking about a refund. What is there to refund if prices didn't rise?
Posted on 2/22/26 at 10:56 am to ragincajun03
Tariffs were largely absorbed by the exporters. These “refund” claims aren’t going to amount to much. Studies confirmed this.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:14 am to lsugolf1105
quote:
Yes, a refund. If something is taken from you illegally, I’m sure you would want it back.
How was it illegal. It was called a tariff in order to give the US leverage. The country fell for it. The US got the leverage and the revenue. Now, because they fought it, the real tariffs kick in.
How many times have you paid a "fee" to your local government for something? That "fee" is certainly a tax, don't ya think?
Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:14 am to frogtown
quote:
If putting that money back into circulation causes the economy to boom, then taking it out in the first place had to have caused a drag.
It's not that binary. Many exporters lowered their price to eat some of the tariff. That's why there wasn't massive inflation.
Let's say a product is usually sold from China for $100 and a 20% tariff is added. China lowers the price to $90 making the net after tariff $108 instead of $120. Retailer decides to increase the price $4 and eat the other $4. If you refund the $18, do you think any of that is going back to China?
Posted on 2/22/26 at 11:17 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
You can't have it both ways.
You go ahead and believe what you just said.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 12:15 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
ALREADY RECLAIMED IT THRU RAISING THEIR PRICES TO THEIR CUSTOMERS.
So yeah, why would they ask for something they passed on and collected already.
I've been told repeatedly that this hasn't happened.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 12:15 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Tariffs arent illegal clown
The Supreme Court ruled that the President didn’t have the authority to impose tariffs based on IEEPA. So tariffs that were collected using this method should be paid back. Why should they not be?
Posted on 2/22/26 at 12:15 pm to Timeoday
quote:
You go ahead and believe what you just said.
It’s one thing to be ignorant but to brag about being ignorant is what makes this board so special.
This post was edited on 2/22/26 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 2/22/26 at 12:19 pm to ChatGPT of LA
quote:
I would rather Trump distribute, than give it to companies that have ALREADY RECLAIMED IT THRU RAISING THEIR PRICES TO THEIR CUSTOMERS.
Not true. Some have. Many haven’t. And many can’t. Many businesses are absorbing a big chunk.
If you want the government to keep the money it collected without proper authority, ok. Your opinion. I just would rather it be given back to the companies that paid it.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 12:24 pm to lsugolf1105
Tariffs are working - and nothing is going to change because of this ruling. Bessett said this morning the tariffs are going to remain in place and just moved over to a different statue that allows it.
Posted on 2/22/26 at 12:28 pm to NashvilleTider
Noted. But should tariffs that were obtained without authority from the government be given back to the companies that paid it?
Posted on 2/22/26 at 12:28 pm to stout
quote:
There won't be refunds IMO
At least not anytime soon. It's going to be a long legal boondoggle
Yeah there will obviously be no refunds. I doubt the question ever even makes it to SCOTUS.
Popular
Back to top



1








