- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We need an EO to force father of every newborn to be financially responsible for the child
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:31 pm to prplngldtigr
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:31 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
I have a single mom in my life. She’s the best mom I know and one of the best people in general.
The father of the child is a worthless bum. She has had to fight him tooth and nail to do the bare minimum.
Fortunately she has a high paying career and is very successful.
These bums get away with it by making sure it’s so difficult to hold them accountable, you just stop trying.
Throw his arse in jail then.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:35 pm to LSUGrrrl
quote:
Right now, women are incentivized by welfare programs to not get married and not have a father living in the home.
Speak for yourself, i have never felt incentivized to have a child out of wedlock to raise on my own.
I need more than $150 a month in food stamps to feel incentivized to do something.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:39 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
I need more than $150 a month in food stamps to feel incentivized to do something.
Its more like $372 per month.
3 kids and you are looking at $1k
and thats just food stamps
This post was edited on 1/31/25 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:43 pm to GeauxtigersMs36
Why does this board insist on taxing the frick out of poor people with no money?
The seething is crazy.
The seething is crazy.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:45 pm to Enadious
If you do that you better be ready for a dictatorship. EO don't and shouldn't have the authority to enact such things. That's what Congess is for.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 12:57 pm to Enadious
I only care about the baby until it's born. The Bible says we need to care for the unborn, it's not my job or anyone else's to take care of a child after it comes out.
The only thing that matters is that the baby lives but after that it doesn't really matter. You people need to go reread your Bibles.
The only thing that matters is that the baby lives but after that it doesn't really matter. You people need to go reread your Bibles.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 1:04 pm to Enadious
So, the mother gets off free? No.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 1:09 pm to dgnx6
quote:
and thats just food stamps
I don’t consider being put on a years long waiting list for section 8 housing an incentive either. I guess my standards are too high.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 1:12 pm to 4cubbies
quote:
Speak for yourself, i have never felt incentivized to have a child out of wedlock to raise on my own.
I need more than $150 a month in food stamps to feel incentivized to do something.
If you are a female with children already receiving benefits for housing, food stamps, child care, etc, many of those benefits are cut when adding a husband to the household. If fact, many are told the father/husband cannot live in the provided housing.
No one spoke to your situation or mine. I spoke to women in those situations. There is a large movement among black men speaking about these very things so you should probably educate yourself on the topic before you attempt a gotcha or attack on me.
This post was edited on 1/31/25 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 1/31/25 at 1:15 pm to Enadious
The same law should apply to mothers as well.
This would be a great way to unburden taxpayers.
This would be a great way to unburden taxpayers.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 1:18 pm to Sofaking2
quote:
If you do that you better have mandatory DNA testing.
And hold the MOTHER to the same standard. Personally, throughout my anecdotal life experiences, I've come across far more deadbeat moms that deadbeat dads.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 1:19 pm to RogerTheShrubber
"Lots of dead beats": Former NBA Seattle Sonics superstar & a millionaire many times over, Shawn Kemp, had 23 kids by 23 mothers. He, at last count, was sued 30+ times for failure to pay court ordered child support. One of the biggest multi sports, sports agents said that the first of the mth is the worst time of the month for him as that is when his office has to send out all his clients' child support checks.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 1:21 pm to Enadious
AND what about mother's being financially responsible
Posted on 1/31/25 at 1:30 pm to Enadious
There are already laws and regulations. People get liens on their pay, income tax refunds. We don't want a Jerry Springer Show made into orders.
HUD needs revamped. HUD can promote family and trade schools/college's within the housing authority.
Enabling a soul (black, white, brown) to sit in their home all day and watch Judge Judy on large screen TVs... Drinking cheap beer and getting stoned as their 4 year old child runs around the yard with guns. Using high end vehicles to buy iphones, ipads. IS NOT HEALTHY.
HUD needs revamped. HUD can promote family and trade schools/college's within the housing authority.
Enabling a soul (black, white, brown) to sit in their home all day and watch Judge Judy on large screen TVs... Drinking cheap beer and getting stoned as their 4 year old child runs around the yard with guns. Using high end vehicles to buy iphones, ipads. IS NOT HEALTHY.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 1:33 pm to prplngldtigr
quote:
But once he ran out of real estate, his true colors shined through.
I will say though, she like many women, put up with some stuff that I think is unacceptable. If you ask her why, is was to help him. He needed her. Classic manipulation of a good heart
So, unless they got married and now divorced, it's still her fault for letting him knock her up.
Having a good heart doesn't mean you slut yourself out without protecting yourself from getting knocked up for "single mom" points.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 1:42 pm to Enadious
I believe the mom and dad both must share the financial burden of care for the child. The entire care cost will be set at the rate that is equivalent to twice the after tax income of the poorest parent which, when split, is an equal amount paid to the state by both parties. The state then disperses the funds to the custodial parent.
The government may not charge any type of cost whatsoever for any action related to child support collection thereof.
Let's see how quickly all parties become responsible regarding the children and pregnancy.
The government may not charge any type of cost whatsoever for any action related to child support collection thereof.
Let's see how quickly all parties become responsible regarding the children and pregnancy.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 4:50 pm to Enadious
More government interference in our lives.
No.
No.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 4:53 pm to Enadious
Let the states take care of this. The federal government is already doing enough via withholding tax refunds, gambling winnings, etc.
Posted on 1/31/25 at 5:15 pm to Enadious
I get what you’re saying but there’s a big issue.
Popular
Back to top


1









