- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Virginia AG Miyares says office is investigating ActBlue for suspected money laundering
Posted on 8/1/24 at 4:33 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Posted on 8/1/24 at 4:33 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
0
Posted on 8/1/24 at 4:35 pm to I20goon
Well the state's themselves can certainly remove a candidate from their ballots for accepting "laundered money". Now wouldnt that be a kick in the head.
Posted on 8/1/24 at 4:37 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:very good point.
Well the state's themselves can certainly remove a candidate from their ballots for accepting "laundered money". Now wouldnt that be a kick in the head.
I like this.
They better get on it, time is short for such.
Posted on 8/1/24 at 4:51 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Shocking. But seriously the whole non profit moniker has gotten out of hand. All these places need to pay taxes. Every entity makes a profit.
Posted on 8/1/24 at 4:52 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
But democrats said there’s no election interference on the left!
Posted on 8/1/24 at 4:56 pm to AUWDE
quote:
There was one I saw reported where a 75 year old lady supposedly donated over a quarter of a million dollars and had hundreds of donations reported in a one day period.
I need a link. I might have accidentally donated a quarter mil, too.
But, I need it back.
It was a clerical error.
I only donated $25, but my wife's computer tacked on 7 more zeros.
The dems should understand this. It happens all the time with their big donors
Posted on 8/1/24 at 5:03 pm to SDVTiger
Can an individual monitor what takes place under their name??
If so, we ought to get a lot of internet tigers to donate 5 bucks and then monitor and record and archive what takes place wrt any activity under their names.
If so, we ought to get a lot of internet tigers to donate 5 bucks and then monitor and record and archive what takes place wrt any activity under their names.
Posted on 8/1/24 at 5:07 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Posted on 8/1/24 at 5:09 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Posted on 8/1/24 at 5:20 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Womp womp
Posted on 8/1/24 at 5:36 pm to SDVTiger
She is a believer.....
Nothing to see here it was a clerical mistake miss so and so was supposed to be dead when we made the donation
Nothing to see here it was a clerical mistake miss so and so was supposed to be dead when we made the donation
Posted on 8/1/24 at 5:38 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
This is my shocked face
Posted on 8/1/24 at 5:43 pm to Diamondawg
quote:
It was the Crooks kid with his $15 donation that tipped the scales.
The running joke even on the liberal networks was we don’t know if he really donated $15?to ActBlue, lol. They know that shite is crooked.
Posted on 8/1/24 at 5:57 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Truth of the matter is if we had some semblance of an impartial DOJ, this would be a slam dunk RICO case. Textbook example of enterprise corruption.
Posted on 8/1/24 at 6:09 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Of course it’s money laundering
Posted on 8/1/24 at 6:18 pm to Jax-Tiger
quote:
Chances are much better with a state investigating it, rather than the feds.
Multiple states at that, and I'm sure several of them want to end this charade. Hopefully they help each other to the finish line instead of stepping on each other's dicks.
Posted on 8/1/24 at 6:25 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Not sure why he wouldn't delegate this investigation to the FBI.
dammit, Chadboy …. I just spewed espresso martini all over my iPad :lol:
Posted on 8/1/24 at 6:35 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
My understanding of money laundering was that it was a method of taking criminal money that couldn’t be spent without bringing heat on you and making it “clean” so you could spend it on cars, boats and houses.
Now I see where this is an obvious campaign finance violation but I’m not understanding how it’s money laundering.
Please explain like I’m a 5yo.
Now I see where this is an obvious campaign finance violation but I’m not understanding how it’s money laundering.
Please explain like I’m a 5yo.
Posted on 8/1/24 at 6:40 pm to Robin Masters
I thought it was a method of hiding mass sums of money by making it clean when it comes out the other side? They wanted this large sum(from hidden large donors) of ActBlue money to be come out the other side as clean donations?
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News