- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: US diesel crack spread hits record $102 for the first time on supply disruptions.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 10:40 am to Taxing Authority
Posted on 8/18/26 at 10:40 am to Taxing Authority
quote:
It has nothing to do with me
Sure but you have never ever ever been right about anything
So Im sure hes not panicking at all
I bet you are a rate hike type of guy as well
Posted on 8/18/26 at 10:47 am to stout
Member when Biden said we were gonna get rid of oil and oil products completely?
I member.
So I don’t understand the freak out. 81 million people voted for getting rid of it completely, why are we worried about it being slightly inhibited currently?
I member.
So I don’t understand the freak out. 81 million people voted for getting rid of it completely, why are we worried about it being slightly inhibited currently?
Posted on 8/18/26 at 10:58 am to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Deleting existing trucks will have a negligible effect on anything except emissions. The fuel savings are negligible, DEF costs are negligible, reliabilty costs are not negligible but vastly overstated.
Not true. Many many modern diesel trucks have DEF issues. I’ve had first hand experience on multiple trucks. The inconvenience of buying DEF alone is worth deleting it
Posted on 8/18/26 at 11:05 am to texag7
quote:
Not true. Many many modern diesel trucks have DEF issues. I’ve had first hand experience on multiple trucks. The inconvenience of buying DEF alone is worth deleting it
And I have first hand experience with fleets of OTR trucks and off highway tier 4 equipment.
The big number is the purchase price of the vehicle/equipment. The engines and auxiliary systems are massively more expensive than a regular mechanical diesel engine and the vehicle itself costs much more to support and integrate with those systems.
None of this will ever come to pass so it doesnt matter. If Trump came out tomorrow and said new EO go out and fully delete your diesels, it wouldnt move the needle on this issue. It would just be a massive boon for the companies who have the capability to do the work, temporarily, until the next dem administration put the kabosh on it.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 11:08 am to stout
quote:
I think he is worried
He should be. Inflation has remained above 3% for most of this year thus far. Inflation is a function of too much money in the economy and Congress is on track to spend $2.1T in deficit this year.
Fun fact: that's the 3rd highest deficit in history, following 2021's $2.77T and 2020's $3.13T.
Fun fact #2: All five of the five largest deficits in US history have happened since 2020.
In order to cut spending just to balance the budget (ie: not pay the debt down one cent) while still servicing the debt, it would mean cutting every penny the federal government spent this year by ~35% (without debt servicing it would be ~29%, but not servicing would be suicide). Cutting that much would create a deep recession or even depression. The resulting popping of the consumer credit bubble would absolutely put us into a deep depression. With the vast majority of the citizenry being far removed from agrarianism, it would likely make the Great Depression look like a church picnic (and no, that's not hyperbole).
As long as deficits remain higher than giraffe pussy, inflation is going to continue to remain sticky well above the 2% target. As long as it remains sticky, the Fed is going to feel pressured to raise rates. As long as there is a probability of the Fed raising rates, yields are going to stay high. Along with that, as long as deficit spending continues apace, there's going to be less desire to buy US debt without an increase in auction tails which will translate to an eventual growth in yields.
In other words, it's a no-win situation and Jerry's mythological "soft landing" remains just that: mythological.
Posted on 8/18/26 at 11:14 am to SDVTiger
quote:
The fed needs to raise rates to fight oil prices
And how is that going to change the lack of refining capacity in distillates? Which is the true cause.
Popular
Back to top


0







