Started By
Message

US diesel crack spread hits record $102 for the first time on supply disruptions.

Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:49 am
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
184510 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:49 am
Will be interesting to see what this does to CoGs. Especially food


Also, Trump could offset some of this by killing DEF. DEF is a hidden tax on consumers to the tune of $2-$3 billion per year. Plus, he will stick it to Obama a little more by ending it.



quote:

It means diesel is trading about $102/barrel above WTI crude, before accounting for actual refinery operating costs, transportation, etc. It is commonly used as a rough gauge of refining profitability and, more importantly right now, of how scarce diesel is relative to crude. ICE describes crack contracts similarly as the spread between refined-product futures and crude futures.

Why it matters: this is signaling that the bottleneck is increasingly refined fuel, not crude oil itself. Middle Eastern exports have been disrupted, Russia has halted international diesel sales after refinery attacks, global refinery throughput has fallen, and U.S. distillate inventories were recently at their lowest seasonal level since 1996. Even though U.S. refiners are producing aggressively, strong exports are pulling barrels out of domestic inventories.

For the economy, that can be nasty. Diesel powers trucks, trains, farm machinery, construction equipment and parts of manufacturing, so sustained high diesel prices can filter into freight costs ? food and goods prices ? inflation. Farmers are especially exposed right now because Northern Hemisphere harvest demand is high.

For markets, refiners are the obvious beneficiaries because each barrel of crude they can turn into diesel is unusually valuable. But there is an important catch: refinery capacity is limited, so a huge margin doesn't instantly create more diesel. Reuters quoted one trader making essentially that point: with the crack above $100 despite rising U.S. production, the constraint has become available refining capacity and replacement supply globally.

So the shortest interpretation is: $102 diesel crack = a flashing red warning that the world is very short refined diesel, even if it isn't necessarily short crude oil. If it persists, I'd watch trucking/freight rates, food inflation, refinery stocks, and broader inflation expectations.



US diesel crack surpasses $100 a barrel for the first time on supply disruptions

Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
159261 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:51 am to
If I let my 2500 get below 1/4, it’s pushing toward $200 to fill it up.

Only use it to tow the camper and side by side so it isn’t a daily driver but still…

That sucks.

I do have the larger tank.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99631 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:54 am to
Rueters is on fire this am. The writer of that article is exactly what i expected

The fed needs to raise rates to fight oil prices
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
184510 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:56 am to
Regardless of what Reuters says, a spread this large is not good for consumers. Even a champion for lower rates like yourself can see that.

Trump needs to find a way out of the war ASAP
This post was edited on 8/18/26 at 7:57 am
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
28293 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:57 am to
Looks like the early summer warnings from the oil majors is starting to come to fruition.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
124891 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:58 am to
Just a small price to pay to beat Iran. Suck it up folks. You don’t need that burrito.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
99631 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 7:59 am to
We arent getting out of it any time soon

But if we raise rates that will surely fight off the inflation caused by these gas price spikes or so Im told by the MB
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
70044 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:01 am to
I watched some energy guy Pilkington on Mario Nawfal a few times and he has been saying late summer/early fall some bad shite would happen in energy markets. Part of that is because China would ramp imports back up. I wonder where we are with the SRP drawdowns.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
184510 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:02 am to
I think they will bump rates. Not sure if it will be effective or more gas on the fire.

Bessent basically said yesterday they will set the stock market on fire before they let the yield get away from them




Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72772 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:05 am to
quote:

Trump could offset some of this by killing DEF. DEF is a hidden tax on consumers to the tune of $2-$3 billion per year.


Sounds great, doesnt work.

The issue is that you cant snap your fingers and start producing trucks with mechanical diesel engines that cost dramatically less than their modern electronic clean counterparts. The manufacturers wouldn't do it. They might do it, but they wouldnt drop the price of the truck as much as they should, and the impact to market wouldnt be as great as it should be.

Now where you would see a boost is maritime transportation. New builds have been on hold because it costs so much to build a tier 4 boat. Couple that with a Jones act waiver and nobody is building shite. It costs too much, and therefore cost of goods go up as fleet population goes down.

If it weren't such a political football it would work, but engine and vehicle manufactures arent going to go back to non-emissions engines for 2 years knowing the next democratic president is going to put all the regulations right back in place.
Posted by Beer did clam
BatonRouge where CATS are RATZ
Member since Oct 2009
1757 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:07 am to
Root cause is refinery capacity, Pres. Trump should put a few billion$ in Warp Speed Refineries. Build out with the speed we’ve seen in AI data or fast food locations. The technology must be somewhere between these two. Streamline the permitting and limit Gov. regulation slow down.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29854 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:09 am to
quote:

I wonder where we are with the SRP drawdowns.


According to the graph on the EIA website, it’s under 300 million barrels for the first time since January 1983.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72772 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:12 am to
Again, too much of a political football. Why would a company invest billions in US fuel manufacturing when they know before the project is completed a democratic administration might show up and shut the whole thing down, either directly or through policy changes that render it economically non-viable?

ExxonMobil and Chevron dont have an obligation to ensure Americans can pay less for gas or potatoe chips. They are obligated to their share holders. Companies in controversial industries have learned to largely ignore what DC tells them to do, and follows their own internal advise, which is the right thing for them to do as a company.

Unless you want publicly owned refineries, the capacity we have now is by and large what we're gonna get unless there are significant geopolitical changes.
Posted by LuckyTiger
Top 1% On Onlyfans
Member since Dec 2008
52928 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:25 am to
quote:

Just a small price to pay to beat Iran. Suck it up folks. You don’t need that burrito.


People were rationed in World War II…Real patriots will dig deep…Rabble Rabble
Posted by DeltaDoc
The Delta
Member since Jan 2008
16949 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:26 am to
Makes you wonder a couple of things…what would it be if we hadn’t attacked Iran, and what are we getting as a result of the war in Iran as a benefit or reward for these added costs?

Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72772 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:36 am to
quote:

what are we getting as a result of the war in Iran as a benefit or reward for these added costs?


Impossible to answer your first question. For this one, we SHOULD be getting a more robust western hemisphere supply chain which would in theory reduce our risks by relying on an unstable region of the world for one of our most critical needs.

I dont think we're actually going to get that and I think Trump dramatically overestimated the average Americans commitment to that. Once the price at the pump went up and stayed up for a week, everyone was over that shite. It takes decades to build up a crude/distillate supply chain. We dont have the appetite for that any more. We want cheap gas today, global political implications be damned.
Posted by geauxbrown
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
27978 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:41 am to
quote:

a small price to pay


Bought a 2,500 gallon tank of diesel lately for farming?
Posted by McLemore
Member since Dec 2003
35521 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:50 am to
quote:

If I let my 2500 get below 1/4, it’s pushing toward $200 to fill it up. Only use it to tow the camper and side by side so it isn’t a daily driver but still… That sucks. I do have the larger tank.


Yeah my 7.3L truck and van are on the infrequent driver plan with State Farm. The truck is basically for working on the property and dump/materials runs.
The van is for 3-4 hour round trips up in the mountains for camping. At $5/gal it’s over $230 to fill. But I haven’t filled it in a year. I run it just for exercise.



Posted by captainFid
Never apologize to barbarism
Member since Dec 2014
11226 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:55 am to
quote:

Also, Trump could offset some of this by killing DEF. DEF is a hidden tax on consumers to the tune of $2-$3 billion per year. Plus, he will stick it to Obama a little more by ending it.




I love diesels but I've refused to purchase one these days, Mr. President, in part, because of DEF.

"Make it So"

"Make Diesels Great Again - MDGA"
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
32320 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 8:55 am to
Older refineries having to shut down or face tremendous costs to upgrade to meet environmental regulations, or state regulations, taxes, and policies running refineries completely out of business (California) has left a shortage of processing capacity nationwide, and it’s even worse in Europe.

Many refineries opted out of spending hundreds of millions of dollars upgrading to meet ever tightening sulfur standards, which directly impacts diesel processing capacity and cost. And heaven forbid a company try to build a new refinery, the NGO’s have made just permitting an expansion at an existing facility nearly impossible, much less a greenfield site. Many tens of millions of dollars have been poured into these organizations by the Federal government and Leftist hacks like Bloomberg, solely for the purpose of obstructing industrial permits.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram