Started By
Message

re: Tucker has dropped his video on Thomas Crooks

Posted on 11/14/25 at 11:04 am to
Posted by ScottFowler
NE Ohio
Member since Sep 2012
4708 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Tucker and Candace are just Alex Jones lite.

They're not CIA, they are professional grifters.



Ahh, but grifting for which team?

Sure would be easier if they just wore labels...
Or advertisements...

This hour of Tucker brought to you by...Mossad.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298718 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 11:05 am to
quote:



Ahh, but grifting for which team?


The Green one. Its all about money
Posted by Tmcgin
BATON ROUGE
Member since Jun 2010
6557 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 11:08 am to
I want to hear more about his alleged demon attack
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 11:13 am to
quote:

And then in January of 2020 did a 180 and started talking about k!lling republicans and Trump supporters


Maybe Covid was a big part of the change based on timing.

Would be interesting to see who was in his circle of friends, online and otherwise, at this time.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91424 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 11:44 am to
quote:

I thought Kash was our guy you guys are beyond being able to keep up with your own mental gymnastics.
This makes no sense.

Plenty folks on our side didn’t like him from day 1.

PLENTY now question him over many things.

There are enough people on the right side-eying Kash that it makes your comment ridiculous.

That’s all without pointing out that it wouldn’t be weird at all for people to really believe in him then but after seeing him in action, disapprove.

Your gotcha is pointless drivel that can’t even come close to being useful for any point you’re trying to make.

And on top of all of that, you don’t even stop to consider it’s a GOOD thing if Kash is terrible and the right is rightfully over him. Isn’t that what people want? The right shows they have some ability to break from the cult(unlike the left) and we get hammered for it?

Thats some SFP levels of childish shite.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 11:47 am
Posted by suavecito80
Member since Apr 2014
3316 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Also bizarre that people are still eager to cover for whatever the FBI has become.


At this point with all the (mis)information that is out there about what they have done (they being CIA, FBI, etc.) people are just to far gone and want to remain ignorant. Wasting energy on those folks is not worth my time or anyone's time for that matter. Ever since COVID I question anything the government says regardless of where it comes from.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

It isn't long and you can safely put it on 1.5x and not lose any context.


Yeah, but RobbBobb is right. The FBI never said there was no online presence.

Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21592 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

Yeah, but RobbBobb is right. The FBI never said there was no online presence.


I'm not getting hung up on that. The FBI/DOJ is shady on this and Tucker put on an informative presentation.

Did I watch it because the topic came up on here in relation to the liar liar you're the liar back and forth between Tucker and Rapid Response? Yes. And I don't regret spending the time watching the video.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

That's the Israel ties.


Yeah. He snuck in the “might be Mossad” angle for sure.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

The FBI/DOJ is shady on this and Tucker put on an informative presentation.


I agree with both points.

But if Tucker is going to pick at small differences in how the FBI presents stuff (which is warranted), then I have no problem with someone picking at his small differences.
Posted by SirWinston
Say NO to War
Member since Jul 2014
104464 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Yeah, but RobbBobb is right. The FBI never said there was no online presence.


This is such a lame point of attack imo.

Tucker pours weeks into a really well done project that nobody else has done and the main criticism is a technicality over whether the obvuously evil and incompetent FBI said "no online presence" or "small online presence".

GTFO mate. You go make a Crooks doc then.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 1:37 pm
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21592 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:33 pm to
quote:

then I have no problem with someone picking at his small differences.


Fair enough.
Posted by SirWinston
Say NO to War
Member since Jul 2014
104464 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

And on top of all of that, you don’t even stop to consider it’s a GOOD thing if Kash is terrible and the right is rightfully over him. Isn’t that what people want? The right shows they have some ability to break from the cult(unlike the left) and we get hammered for it?

Thats some childish shite.


Spot on.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 1:35 pm
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
71022 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:38 pm to
Just started. Man, the fight fight fight scene is stil so incredibly badass. frick that kid and whomever else was involved. You created millions of "extremists" in your failure. You dumb fricking losers.
Posted by Mushroom1968
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2023
6239 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:45 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.



Over 480 FBI employees were involved in the Thomas Crooks investigation. Employees conducted over 1,000 interviews, addressed over 2,000 public tips, analyzed data extracted from 13 seized digital devices, reviewed nearly 500,000 digital files, collected, processed, and synchronized hundreds of hours of video footage, analyzed financial activity from 10 different accounts, and examined data associated with 25 social media or online forum accounts.

The FBI’s investigation into Thomas Crooks identified and examined over 20 online accounts, data extracted from over a dozen electronic devices, examination of numerous financial accounts, and over 1,000 interviews and 2000 public tips.

The investigation, conducted by over 480 FBI employees, revealed Crooks had limited online and in person interactions, planned and conducted the attack alone, and did not leak or share his intent to engage in the attack with anyone.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 1:46 pm
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
109181 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

Tucker is killing it lately


Democrats are killing, Tucker is just reporting on their killings.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167047 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:56 pm to
quote:

The whole quibble about 'Hey, the FBI didn't say he had NO online footprint!' might be one of the goofiest things I've ever seen anyone knight for.
Even after watching the video... I wasn't thinking about the quibble. I was thinking The quibble is moot.

Patel and Bongino need to answer to A LOT. Starting with what lawsuit was ongoing that they couldn't comment even recently under oath. They have refused any J13 records to Congress for a year. They closed it and told DJT.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


The TC video could be answered to swiftly-- by even the current FBI admitting they had no idea the J13 assassin, Crooks was not right wing.

If the posters that refuse to see anything beyond their Tucker bias WATCH THE VIDEO. They would see that there was someone in the chat that was egging on Crooks, and oh I dunno... if the FBI tracked that person down by now?

Or that the data showed NO IRAN fingerprints whatsoever.

This minimal information, that the assassin was MAGA and then suddenly like a light switched wanting to kill Trump-- should have been released.

The pivotal part was that in the video, it was shown clearly that the FBI uses programs that they would have 100% been alerted to Crooks.

None of the information that the FBI surely knows as shown in the TC video -being public- would affect anything. If TC can help their case all power to him because they closed the case and said nothing there, there- and said so on TV.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 2:01 pm
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37478 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:06 pm to
He certainly knows his audience.
Posted by JackieTreehorn
Member since Sep 2013
35576 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:13 pm to
There is zero doubt crooks was trained, financed, supported, and ultimately eliminated by deep state operatives, the secret service directed by the democrats.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167047 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:18 pm to
First red flag out the gate, underlined below was repeated. Liars get mucked up in detail and are repetitive. I raised a lot of kids and know detective work.

Sorry but he seems nervous, repeating an FBI PR line. And there was online interaction right before the assassination attempt, clearly shown in the TC video.

quote:

The investigation, conducted by over 480 FBI employees, revealed Crooks had limited online and in person interactions, planned and conducted the attack alone, and did not leak or share his intent to engage in the attack with anyone.


Why would TC makeup such a pivotal matter of Nat Sec whole cloth? Patel is being a Wray repetitive clone, 'we cannot comment-on going investigations' mantra; and seems to be reading from Wray's PR press releases as if he has a gun to his head.

He acts like how dare anyone bother or question him, he is being batman and robin with Bongino.

first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram