- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tucker has dropped his video on Thomas Crooks
Posted on 11/14/25 at 11:04 am to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 11/14/25 at 11:04 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Tucker and Candace are just Alex Jones lite.
They're not CIA, they are professional grifters.
Ahh, but grifting for which team?
Sure would be easier if they just wore labels...
Or advertisements...
This hour of Tucker brought to you by...Mossad.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 11:05 am to ScottFowler
quote:
Ahh, but grifting for which team?
The Green one. Its all about money
Posted on 11/14/25 at 11:08 am to SirWinston
I want to hear more about his alleged demon attack
Posted on 11/14/25 at 11:13 am to Godzilla jr
quote:
And then in January of 2020 did a 180 and started talking about k!lling republicans and Trump supporters
Maybe Covid was a big part of the change based on timing.
Would be interesting to see who was in his circle of friends, online and otherwise, at this time.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 11:44 am to theballguy
quote:This makes no sense.
I thought Kash was our guy you guys are beyond being able to keep up with your own mental gymnastics.
Plenty folks on our side didn’t like him from day 1.
PLENTY now question him over many things.
There are enough people on the right side-eying Kash that it makes your comment ridiculous.
That’s all without pointing out that it wouldn’t be weird at all for people to really believe in him then but after seeing him in action, disapprove.
Your gotcha is pointless drivel that can’t even come close to being useful for any point you’re trying to make.
And on top of all of that, you don’t even stop to consider it’s a GOOD thing if Kash is terrible and the right is rightfully over him. Isn’t that what people want? The right shows they have some ability to break from the cult(unlike the left) and we get hammered for it?
Thats some SFP levels of childish shite.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 11:47 am
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:13 pm to NIH
quote:
Also bizarre that people are still eager to cover for whatever the FBI has become.
At this point with all the (mis)information that is out there about what they have done (they being CIA, FBI, etc.) people are just to far gone and want to remain ignorant.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:21 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
It isn't long and you can safely put it on 1.5x and not lose any context.
Yeah, but RobbBobb is right. The FBI never said there was no online presence.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:25 pm to the808bass
quote:
Yeah, but RobbBobb is right. The FBI never said there was no online presence.
I'm not getting hung up on that. The FBI/DOJ is shady on this and Tucker put on an informative presentation.
Did I watch it because the topic came up on here in relation to the liar liar you're the liar back and forth between Tucker and Rapid Response? Yes. And I don't regret spending the time watching the video.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:29 pm to dgnx6
quote:
That's the Israel ties.
Yeah. He snuck in the “might be Mossad” angle for sure.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:31 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
The FBI/DOJ is shady on this and Tucker put on an informative presentation.
I agree with both points.
But if Tucker is going to pick at small differences in how the FBI presents stuff (which is warranted), then I have no problem with someone picking at his small differences.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:32 pm to the808bass
quote:
Yeah, but RobbBobb is right. The FBI never said there was no online presence.
This is such a lame point of attack imo.
Tucker pours weeks into a really well done project that nobody else has done and the main criticism is a technicality over whether the obvuously evil and incompetent FBI said "no online presence" or "small online presence".
GTFO mate. You go make a Crooks doc then.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 1:37 pm
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:33 pm to the808bass
quote:
then I have no problem with someone picking at his small differences.
Fair enough.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:34 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
And on top of all of that, you don’t even stop to consider it’s a GOOD thing if Kash is terrible and the right is rightfully over him. Isn’t that what people want? The right shows they have some ability to break from the cult(unlike the left) and we get hammered for it?
Thats some childish shite.
Spot on.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 1:35 pm
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:38 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Just started. Man, the fight fight fight scene is stil so incredibly badass. frick that kid and whomever else was involved. You created millions of "extremists" in your failure. You dumb fricking losers.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:45 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Over 480 FBI employees were involved in the Thomas Crooks investigation. Employees conducted over 1,000 interviews, addressed over 2,000 public tips, analyzed data extracted from 13 seized digital devices, reviewed nearly 500,000 digital files, collected, processed, and synchronized hundreds of hours of video footage, analyzed financial activity from 10 different accounts, and examined data associated with 25 social media or online forum accounts.
The FBI’s investigation into Thomas Crooks identified and examined over 20 online accounts, data extracted from over a dozen electronic devices, examination of numerous financial accounts, and over 1,000 interviews and 2000 public tips.
The investigation, conducted by over 480 FBI employees, revealed Crooks had limited online and in person interactions, planned and conducted the attack alone, and did not leak or share his intent to engage in the attack with anyone.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 1:46 pm
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:47 pm to SirWinston
quote:
Tucker is killing it lately
Democrats are killing, Tucker is just reporting on their killings.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 1:56 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:Even after watching the video... I wasn't thinking about the quibble. I was thinking
The whole quibble about 'Hey, the FBI didn't say he had NO online footprint!' might be one of the goofiest things I've ever seen anyone knight for.
The quibble is moot. Patel and Bongino need to answer to A LOT. Starting with what lawsuit was ongoing that they couldn't comment even recently under oath. They have refused any J13 records to Congress for a year. They closed it and told DJT.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. The TC video could be answered to swiftly-- by even the current FBI admitting they had no idea the J13 assassin, Crooks was not right wing.
If the posters that refuse to see anything beyond their Tucker bias WATCH THE VIDEO. They would see that there was someone in the chat that was egging on Crooks, and oh I dunno... if the FBI tracked that person down by now?
Or that the data showed NO IRAN fingerprints whatsoever.
This minimal information, that the assassin was MAGA and then suddenly like a light switched wanting to kill Trump-- should have been released.
The pivotal part was that in the video, it was shown clearly that the FBI uses programs that they would have 100% been alerted to Crooks.
None of the information that the FBI surely knows as shown in the TC video -being public- would affect anything. If TC can help their case all power to him because they closed the case and said nothing there, there- and said so on TV.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 2:01 pm
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:06 pm to SirWinston
He certainly knows his audience.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:13 pm to IvoryBillMatt
There is zero doubt crooks was trained, financed, supported, and ultimately eliminated by deep state operatives, the secret service directed by the democrats.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:18 pm to Mushroom1968
First red flag out the gate, underlined below was repeated. Liars get mucked up in detail and are repetitive. I raised a lot of kids and know detective work.
Sorry but he seems nervous, repeating an FBI PR line. And there was online interaction right before the assassination attempt, clearly shown in the TC video.
Why would TC makeup such a pivotal matter of Nat Sec whole cloth? Patel is being a Wray repetitive clone, 'we cannot comment-on going investigations' mantra; and seems to be reading from Wray's PR press releases as if he has a gun to his head.
He acts like how dare anyone bother or question him, he is being batman and robin with Bongino.
Sorry but he seems nervous, repeating an FBI PR line. And there was online interaction right before the assassination attempt, clearly shown in the TC video.
quote:
The investigation, conducted by over 480 FBI employees, revealed Crooks had limited online and in person interactions, planned and conducted the attack alone, and did not leak or share his intent to engage in the attack with anyone.
Why would TC makeup such a pivotal matter of Nat Sec whole cloth? Patel is being a Wray repetitive clone, 'we cannot comment-on going investigations' mantra; and seems to be reading from Wray's PR press releases as if he has a gun to his head.
He acts like how dare anyone bother or question him, he is being batman and robin with Bongino.
Popular
Back to top


1








