- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tucker has dropped his video on Thomas Crooks
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:31 am to GhostOfFreedom
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:31 am to GhostOfFreedom
This.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:35 am to GhostOfFreedom
quote:
IMHO, he thought he was going to get away. His accomplice(s) showed him the "explosives" in the van, gave him the remote, told him he could detonate it for a diversion, and then get to his getaway car.
Good theory.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:35 am to IvoryBillMatt
Tucker is also asking who Willy Tepes is. Crooks’s online footprint suddenly disappeared after Crooks’s online encounter with him. Tucker has screenshots of a “Willy Tepes” putting pressure on Crooks to commit acts of violence.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:37 am to IvoryBillMatt
To be as objective as I can be. Was that Eric Trump statement when Wray or Patel was FBI Dir?
Trump said essentially, they are doing great I placed them and this is what they said-nothing to see here...
There are a lot of crimes-I get Patel/Bongino are busy---- but this Tucker video shows me Patel and Bongino were shown what Wray wanted them to see. There is no way they can say no there, there. But they did, why?
Trump said essentially, they are doing great I placed them and this is what they said-nothing to see here...
There are a lot of crimes-I get Patel/Bongino are busy---- but this Tucker video shows me Patel and Bongino were shown what Wray wanted them to see. There is no way they can say no there, there. But they did, why?
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 9:38 am
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:40 am to cajunangelle
quote:
But they did, why?
64 million dollar question...along with lies about Epstein jail video and lack of visible progress on J6 pipe bomber.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:42 am to Chingon Ag
quote:
Additionally, the SS drone tech happened to go down just as Crooks was flying his drone. How convenient.
Yep, just like the Jan 6th pipe bomber surveillance camera. Stationary and perfect view on the location for months until 5 minutes before the ‘pipe bomb’ was dropped. It randomly rotates to a useless view right at that time/
These coincidences aren’t coincidental any more.
I had extreme optimism about Kash and Bongino. I haven’t completely given up hope as they
may just be coy to not risk the investigation but I’m quickly losing hope. We’ll never get answers. Trump should be going full bore on the assassination attempts but he’s just inst doing it.
Using their favorite line, there IS something there there but they’re just not going to tell us.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:44 am to GhostOfFreedom
quote:Good thinking... So why was the white van even highlighted in a day of media reports? Locals LEO's brought it up and FBI just disappeared it to a bon fire?
Remember the remote that Crooks had?
IMHO, he thought he was going to get away. His accomplice(s) showed him the "explosives" in the van, gave him the remote, told him he could detonate it for a diversion, and then get to his getaway car.
He was never going to leave that roof. He just didn't know it.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:44 am to SouthernHog
quote:
That part is fascinating to me, IMO seems like FBI and DOJ are behind Crooks' attempt.
They were also behind the murder of Charlie Kirk
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:46 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Locals LEO's brought it up
Because they weren’t in on it.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:46 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Damn… he’s got receipts.
Did he provide a receipt where the FBI said there was no Crooks online presence?
Because thats what the only thing they called him out on. Or are we just going to ignore that Tucker accused them of that?
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:51 am to SouthernHog
quote:
FBI coming off as shady AF in dealing with this.
Well, yeah...
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:53 am to SouthernHog
quote:
I wonder if he will tackle Charlie Kirks assignation next?
The FBI is working the same way with Kirk’s assassination. The crime scene never secured then quickly paved and bricked over. The tunnel area re-stuccoed. The person who disappeared this time is Robinson’s roommate.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:56 am to RobbBobb
quote:
Did he provide a receipt where the FBI said there was no Crooks online presence? Because thats what the only thing they called him out on. Or are we just going to ignore that Tucker accused them of that?
Have you ever seen the kid's movie "Shrek"?
There's a part in it where Pinocchio is trying his damnedest to mislead without lying, the most doublespeak word salad you can imagine.
That's what I think of the FBI in this instance... lemme see if I can either find the clip or find the script for that part.
Here it is... very funny, but also reminiscent of FBI communication. The clip says 3+ minutes, but just watch 1:38-2:21.
Are you at all curious about the FBI asserting there is some mysterious ongoing trial concerning J13 and Crooks?
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:57 am to Houag80
quote:
Like they pushed a switch and reversed his programming.
MK Ultra
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:58 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
MK Ultra
He seems like the right candidate.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 9:59 am to IvoryBillMatt
I, personally, would like to thank TigerDroppings for the commercial-free viewing of this video and others. If you go to the YouTube link it's got commercials.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 10:01 am to cajunangelle
quote:
cajunangelle
Your post is on point!
Posted on 11/14/25 at 10:08 am to SallysHuman
Three letter agencies’ have perfected BLACKMAIL and it must be a helluva game changer.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 10:11 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Are you at all curious about the FBI asserting there is some mysterious ongoing trial concerning J13 and Crooks?
Look I dont trust the FBI, but Tucker baited this video with the claim that the FBI said something, that they never said
So I dont trust Tucker either
I mean, he went to court to defend himself against a slander lawsuit and basically said, I'm an entertainer dont believe anything I claim as facts
The judge agreed and dismissed the case
Hes a grifter. And people posting his videos and then discussing the "points" hes making should be embarrassed
Hes a grifter.
And behind your backs, hes laughing, and texting, and emailing how much he loathes people that follow him. Like he did with Trump, and the MAGA crowd as revealed with the Dominion lawsuit
Popular
Back to top


0






