Started By
Message

re: Tucker has dropped his video on Thomas Crooks

Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:36 pm to
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21588 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:36 pm to
Robb....

I don't know where from or by whom you've got those commentary quotes... why can't you at least skim the video? Just a little?
Posted by The Cool No 9
70816
Member since Jan 2014
11140 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:41 pm to
quote:

wonder if he will tackle Charlie Kirks assignation next?
Seems like the logical sequel

But knowing Tucker it's going to be well done. This took over a year before anything like this was released so it may be a while
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 7:42 pm
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34201 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:46 pm to
quote:

And oddly, the van supposedly outfitted with explosives had an Arizona license plate that possibly had connections to his family,

Its already been debunked
quote:

However, in its report, Fox linked to a story about authorities finding explosives in Crooks’ car, not a van, and those included an IED or improvised explosive device.

It appears Fox may have confused the two vehicles. Other news services, including reported that law enforcement searched Crooks’ Hyundai Sonata that he had driven to the fairgrounds in Butler the day of the shooting. He had no connection the van found
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34201 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:49 pm to
quote:

I don't know where from or by whom you've got those commentary quotes.

Newsweek

Newsbreak

The Independent
Posted by Mr Roboto
Seattle
Member since Jan 2023
8153 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 7:51 pm to
Most corrupt government in world history
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21588 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

RobbBobb


I watched the actual video... now I gotta read news articles about what I watched? You're killing me.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
143773 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 8:13 pm to
That was a lot of information I had never seen or heard before.

The networks should be ashamed.
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34201 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 8:13 pm to
quote:

I watched the actual video

You watched Tuckers interpretation, and bought into it

I read others interpretations, and no one else seemed to buy into it
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21588 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

You watched Tuckers interpretation, and bought into it I read others interpretations, and no one else seemed to buy into it


Tucker's interpretation of Tucker's video?

Question... are the articles you linked concerning Tucker's video?
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34201 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 10:58 pm to
quote:

Question... are the articles you linked concerning Tucker's video?

Solely
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21588 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

Solely


Why would I read an article about the video... when I already saw the video?
Posted by RobbBobb
Member since Feb 2007
34201 posts
Posted on 11/14/25 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

Why would I read an article about the video... when I already saw the video?

Are you being obtuse?

You said your take on the video was X, Y, and Z

I said most everyone else saw it as Tucker saying that Trump was hiding who his actual killer was. And then I gave you links from well read news sites that stated exactly that. You then told me to watch the video. As if that was going to outweigh what most people were already saying and reading about the video

So I will repeat . . . . No matter what Tucker tries to convince you of, Trump and his FBI arent altering data that would lead them to another killer. Trump would fry them for that. They know it. So Tucker is just being divisive YET AGAIN to MAGA

You need to step back and realize how Tucker uses media. Its exactly like SFP does on here. Hes always going to find a way to show you that conservatives arent effective leaders. Always
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127358 posts
Posted on 11/15/25 at 2:28 am to
Tucker is asking some very uncomfortable questions.
Posted by PastorJ
Member since Sep 2024
885 posts
Posted on 11/15/25 at 4:48 am to
And got immediately fact-checked by the FBI. Tucker has gone straight loony.
Posted by griswold
Member since Oct 2009
4317 posts
Posted on 11/15/25 at 5:42 am to
quote:

IMHO, he thought he was going to get away. His accomplice(s) showed him the "explosives" in the van, gave him the remote, told him he could detonate it for a diversion, and then get to his getaway car. He was never going to leave that roof. He just didn't know it.
You forget one thing. He missed his target. This requires him to stay on the roof longer which gives LE time to kill him. I think if he kills Trump in that first burst of shots he gets away.
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
16037 posts
Posted on 11/15/25 at 7:38 am to
quote:

Tucker is a cancer

Seriously?

For pointing out obvious discrepancies and that no investigation was done into this?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128773 posts
Posted on 11/15/25 at 7:43 am to
quote:

no investigation was done into this


This is the problem with Tucker’s language. It gets echoed by others.

There was a large investigation done. You aren’t privy to it. That does not equal “no investigation.” Nor are you owed full access to the investigation.

Do I think some of the stuff that went down in the investigation looks completely suspicious? Yes. That also does not equal “no investigation.”
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
298708 posts
Posted on 11/15/25 at 7:45 am to
quote:

that no investigation was done into this?


An apparent lie.

This is the stupidity that runs rampant when influencers who are paid to be overly dramatic have undue influence.
Posted by Original Bayou Boy
Flat Lake, LA
Member since Sep 2003
11618 posts
Posted on 11/15/25 at 7:55 am to
quote:

Bongino is disappointing as he was totally honest at one time. Makes one wonder if the ascension to power is absolutely corruptive. I.e., "power corrupts".


Bongino isn't corrupt. There is simply so much work to do to unravel the entrenched ideologues in the F.B.I. and other agencys.

Bongino and Patel WERE NOT at the F.B.I. when Trump was almost killed.

Sadly, this situation is one of many problems Bongino and Patel will need to address. These things take time. Justice isn't like instant coffee.
Posted by riverdiver
Summerville SC
Member since May 2022
2981 posts
Posted on 11/15/25 at 8:16 am to
quote:

Its already been debunked quote: However, in its report, Fox linked to a story about authorities finding explosives in Crooks’ car, not a van, and those included an IED or improvised explosive device. It appears Fox may have confused the two vehicles. Other news services, including reported that law enforcement searched Crooks’ Hyundai Sonata that he had driven to the fairgrounds in Butler the day of the shooting. He had no connection the van found


The van wasn’t connected to Crooks. The van apparently was connected to the family of the person who was named on social media, and has since apparently disappeared without a trace.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram