Started By
Message

re: Trump tells the dept of war to strike if attacks on Christians in Nigeria don’t stop

Posted on 11/1/25 at 7:38 pm to
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
6211 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 7:38 pm to
quote:

I'd rather be saber rattling with Venezuela and protecting Christians in Nigeria that funding both sides of the Israel Palestine conflict or continuing to fund a losing effort in Ukraine.

Venezuela has been poisoning us for years with their drugs and religious persecution against Christians across the globe has gotten well out of control.


I support this message.
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
16388 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 7:48 pm to
I have to grapple with not liking being world police and wanting every extremist muslim dead.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
23670 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 7:48 pm to
quote:

Nigeria


quote:

Monroe doctrine


Posted by BigD45
318/936/830
Member since Feb 2007
1920 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 7:55 pm to
quote:

Bro, everyone knows that there is no reason ever for America to use its military for anything whatsoever short of an imminent invasion of our mainland - if and only if
the invading forces are within 20 or so nautical miles of our coastline. Our military has no business going beyond 20 miles, ever, for anything. Nothing beyond 20 miles of our shorelines has anything to do with us. Let the rest of the world do its own thing. We’ll do ours. Oh and anything beyond what I’ve explained above renders you a neocon jerkoff.


This is the dumbest thing I've seen posted on here. 20 miles? What about all of the offshore drilling rigs that are over 100 miles off the coast?
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35156 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:10 pm to
If you can’t tell that’s satire, and rather exaggerated satire at that, then I don’t know what to tell ya. Well, maybe there are a few things. This place can make a man lose sight of real vs make believe, because frankly there IS some of the craziest shite you’ve ever seen read here, and it’s meant genuinely by the authors.

However there’s also a lot of playing pretend and mind gaming found here as well. Sometimes it’s difficult to differentiate between them. But in this instance, note the lack of other criticism of the same nature as yours….a textbook sign of an unannounced acknowledgment by the majority that mine was indeed satire. Otherwise, you’d have seen much more of what you have there.

Are there downvoters? Obviously. But who knows what they actually are thinking because they didn’t have the chest to speak their minds, unlike yourself. I like your spirit.

P.S. If it’s me who’s being trolled here, then you’re a badass.
This post was edited on 11/1/25 at 8:23 pm
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
69160 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:15 pm to
I want to hate this, but I'm in full crusade mode right now so go get our brethren.
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Trumpist Populism: Politics by LCD
Member since Oct 2025
2292 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:21 pm to
I don't see the relevance of a US statutory definition. In common usage, "genocide is the deliberate, often systematic, destruction of a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group."

There are approximately 100 million Christians in Nigeria, and estimates of the number killed by Boko Haran in the last 20 years range between 50,000 and 100,000. For the math-challenged, that is somewhere between 1/20 and 1/10 of ONE PERCENT of the Christians in the country. That is not a "genocide." It is a rounding error.

If Hitler had killed 6,000 Jews rather than 6 million, would you consider THAT to be a "genocide?" It would be an atrocity, certainly, but not a "genocide."

In absolute terms, 50,000 certainly IS a significant number and undoubtedly criminal. But if Boko Haran is trying to kill/destroy all of the Christians in Nigeria, they are doing a piss-poor job of it.

For millennia, Africans have been killing other Africans over religion and a dozen other justifications. This is just not any of our business, unless we are going to engage in similar rescue operations for EVERY religious minority in EVERY country on the globe, and I have absolutely no interest in our doing that.
This post was edited on 11/1/25 at 11:01 pm
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
10346 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

quote:
Im 100% fine with my country's military protecting Christians overseas

Excellent. When do you expect them to arrive in Ukraine?


This is not even close to a gotcha. That is a regional war between two sovereign countries. This is innocent Christians being massacred by muslims, in a country that we send aid to
Posted by METAL
Member since Nov 2020
1601 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:24 pm to
At some point the muslim extremists need to have their pee pees schwacked.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
53804 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:24 pm to
Why is the US the only one? It should be a lot of countries
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35156 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:27 pm to
Is that how you’re assessing whether such potential actions are right or wrong?
Posted by RelentlessAnalysis
Trumpist Populism: Politics by LCD
Member since Oct 2025
2292 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

quote:

Bro, everyone knows that there is no reason ever for America to use its military for anything whatsoever short of an imminent invasion of our mainland - if and only if the invading forces are within 20 or so nautical miles of our coastline. Our military has no business going beyond 20 miles, ever, for anything. Nothing beyond 20 miles of our shorelines has anything to do with us. Let the rest of the world do its own thing. We’ll do ours. Oh and anything beyond what I’ve explained above renders you a neocon jerkoff.
This is the dumbest thing I've seen posted on here. 20 miles? What about all of the offshore drilling rigs that are over 100 miles off the coast?
Good Lord, when was your sarcasm bone broken, and have you seen a physician about it?
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
18174 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:33 pm to
Did our ic arm the terrorists who are killing Christians? Sadly gotta ask that, because we seem to create the issues just so we've something to intervene in, a lot of times.


At least we trying to stop the Christians from being murdered though. When ic helped arm ISIS, entire government looked the other way for years when ISIS started going from village to village exterminating Christians.
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35156 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

Did our ic arm the terrorists who are killing Christians? Sadly gotta ask that, because we seem to create the issues just so we've something to intervene in, a lot of times.

I’d hazard a guess not while Trump’s been President. He seems to be taking a slightly different tack.
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3796 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

Ukrainians are Christians…

So are Mexicans.
Posted by Plx1776
Member since Oct 2017
18174 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:38 pm to
I'd go as far to say not any president actually organized those strategies. Ic seems to have been working independently from any checks and balances for several decades.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
57012 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

What happened to MAGA supporting a more non interventionist policy and no endless wars. It’s not our job to prevent every atrocity in every third world shithole. 38 trillion in debt and counting


It’s mass extermination right now in Africa. I’m sorry but innocent people need to be protected and we are the largest Christian nation in the world. I’m glad you TDS types weren’t alive in the 30s and 40s.
Posted by Reflex
Member since Oct 2025
273 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:46 pm to
quote:

we are the largest Christian nation in the world


Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35156 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 8:48 pm to
That’s a good point, but my intuition tells me that the days of those type relatively commonplace tactics/strategies have passed into history, for a litany of possible reasons. Keeping controversial tactics as such under wraps is quite a different animal this day in age, thus a near presumption that the decision makers in such situations will be made known, sooner than later - perhaps too high a risk in that regard. Not to mention other possible endless fallout.

But I wouldn’t be so naive as to say it would never happen again. It could and maybe should in some very limited and controlled/contained capacity.

Then there’s always the possibility that I’m wrong about everything and simply talking out of my arse. I’m a realist, and acknowledge that possibility. Even if it’s a massive long shot.
Posted by Prodigal Son
Member since May 2023
1602 posts
Posted on 11/1/25 at 9:11 pm to
quote:

Matthew 25:40-45 New International Version 40 “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram