Started By
Message

re: Trump bans AI giant Anthropic, after dispute of AI military weapons and surveillance

Posted on 2/27/26 at 8:26 pm to
Posted by bignuss18
Member since Sep 2025
806 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 8:26 pm to
Are you high? What does this have to do with my statement?

If anything, it further proves my stance; this is media rah rah perpetrated by “fortune.com” (and by a Goldman - HUUH THATS WEIRD) when in the backroom, the leaders of ChatCPT, Anthropic, Gemini are all on the same page for one simple objective - profit.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
7967 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 8:56 pm to
quote:

No, he doesn’t,

...
Lol...

Hes world class petty.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54721 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:03 pm to
quote:

think Anthropic's desires to not be used in weapon systems or mass surveillance are laudable. However, the DoW doesn't have to do business with them. Furthermore, I am deeply concerned when the White House starts trying to compel private companies to do things under specious defense production justification.


This is called capitalism. Dept of war won't do business. Ai company must decide how to find the right customer
Posted by Diego Ricardo
Alabama
Member since Dec 2020
13250 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:07 pm to
quote:

This is called capitalism. Dept of war won't do business. Ai company must decide how to find the right customer



Right. I don't like the government claiming war necessities without any war that justifies such drastic intervention in private enterprise.

Yeah, it made sense to tell Ford and GM they're making tanks, jeeps, fighters, and bombers when WWII is going on.

I'm not sure I see the same national security urgency over AI right now but there may be a day and when it comes nobody who cares about this country will penning letters about their red lines.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
22084 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:13 pm to
You don’t need a war to prepare for the next war.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
54721 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

I'm not sure I see the same national security urgency over AI right now but there may be a day and when it comes nobody who cares about this country will penning letters about their red lines.


In my opinion there is not enough concern.

Government wants to know the full extent of a potential enemy tool. We can't wait for stuff to hit the fan then figure it out. AI will be far advanced in 5 years
Posted by VOLhalla
Knoxville
Member since Feb 2011
5138 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

In essence Trump will agree to Antrhopic's terms, just with open AI instead, cause Hegseth is such a clown he bluffed and can’t back down but in essence they will?


Basically. The pentagon wanted Anthropic to back down and give in. But they didn’t. So the pentagon dropped the most advanced AI for a lesser model with the same standards.

Hegseth was embarrassed and now the pentagon is downgrading for no reason
This post was edited on 2/27/26 at 9:38 pm
Posted by SnacknGold06
Member since Oct 2025
147 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:20 pm to
I think Anthropic is doing us all a solid. We don’t want a surveillance state. Almost nothing good comes from that route. Hell almost every dystopian fiction is predicated on this type of technology getting into the wrong hands.
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
4409 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

Yeah seems bad. The surveillance implications are crazy, especially when we contemplate what some future administration might use it for.


Again, you don’t change your name to the Department of War for nothing. Trump is seeking federal control over elections, and now Pete is creating a surveillance state. It’s not hard to draw a conclusion on this one.
This post was edited on 2/27/26 at 9:28 pm
Posted by bignuss18
Member since Sep 2025
806 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:33 pm to
That is what they want you to believe. These guys stack money hand over fist and while they can be greedy, they know their products have enough overlap to destroy one another. It’s technology’s version of M.A.D. Hence my analogy to Apple, Microsoft and Linux. They all serve a purpose, but anyone one of them can serve any purpose. They’ve come to backroom agreements to divide and conquer the market. AI isn’t any different to any other product, consumed by the masses or consumed by the government.

Another analogy - Raytheon, Lockheed, Northrop - all can achieve the same thing, but they also don’t seem to want to. There is no explanation other than controlled diversification within the same market. They make enough money, hand over fist, to justify it.
Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
7967 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:36 pm to
quote:

That is what they want you to believe.

...
No... he's really that petty...
Posted by bignuss18
Member since Sep 2025
806 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:56 pm to
I mean hey, if that’s what you believe, I don’t disagree. Maybe he is. But my experience in the industry tells me otherwise. To each their own.
Posted by GetMeOutOfHere
Member since Aug 2018
1141 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 9:58 pm to
quote:

Right. I don't like the government claiming war necessities without any war that justifies such drastic intervention in private enterprise.


It isn't like the government is an outside third party here interfering, though. They're asking for services to be provided a certain way, anthropic can say yes or no.

Has it been confirmed that the dispute was over autonomous weapons/mass surveillance, or is everyone just taking Anthropic's word for it?

The idea that the military would more or less have to answer to a private company is straight out of cyberpunk books, movies, and games that every self-proclaimed intellectual warns about, yet you look online and it's all about how wonderful Anthropic is for "standing up for freedom" and the like.

The Hill

quote:

He wants nothing more than to try to personally control the US Military and is ok putting our nation’s safety at risk,” Michael continued. “The @DeptofWar will ALWAYS adhere to the law but not bend to whims of any one for-profit tech company.”


Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89818 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:04 pm to
quote:

I think Anthropic's desires to not be used in weapon systems or mass surveillance are laudable. However, the DoW doesn't have to do business with them. Furthermore, I am deeply concerned when the White House starts trying to compel private companies to do things under specious defense production justification.



Well one thing the ceo and Trump agree on is not falling behind China.


Just don’t agree on anything else. Especially considering the CEO is a Harris supporter.


Posted by Narax
Member since Jan 2023
7967 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:16 pm to
quote:

. To each their own.


Yea I wouldn't disagree on the other ones, especially the older established ones.
Posted by Root_User
Member since Dec 2025
220 posts
Posted on 2/27/26 at 10:25 pm to
quote:

We don’t want a surveillance state.


As you willingly give Google, X, Meta, Open AI, etc all of your information for free. Doh!
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39873 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 12:27 am to
This whole thing was handled very poorly. It's now been handed to Open AI. Anthropic is the superior model, already integrated and proven to have worked in a serious operation like Venezuela.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


I said earlier it was because Hegseth stupidly bluffed and then couldn't go back. But I wonder if it wasn't just garden variety corruption, as Open AI is by far Trump's biggest donor.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
39873 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 12:28 am to
quote:

The pentagon wanted Anthropic to back down and give in. But they didn’t. So the pentagon dropped the most advanced AI for a lesser model with the same standards.

Hegseth was embarrassed and now the pentagon is downgrading for no reason
Yeah. fricking clown show.
Posted by The_Duke
Member since Nov 2016
4409 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 1:06 am to
quote:

I said earlier it was because Hegseth stupidly bluffed and then couldn't go back. But I wonder if it wasn't just garden variety corruption, as Open AI is by far Trump's biggest donor.


Possibly true

Another note to add is that OpenAI is floundering and cash-strapped--they are desperate. This could be the move Pete needs to get his way, because OpenAI cannot afford to lose ANY deal so they will bend the knee at any request.
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12382 posts
Posted on 2/28/26 at 2:07 am to
It’s time for America to wake TF up about what is happening.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram