Favorite team:Tennessee 
Location:Knoxville
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:5028
Registered on:2/23/2011
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Elon: “Please keep pouring trillions into a technology that isn’t anywhere close to being profitable.”

re: US Attacking Venezuela

Posted by VOLhalla on 1/3/26 at 8:52 am to
quote:

Well when its close enough to boat in drugs, a bit different.


Except Venezuela is a pretty small player in the international dug trade. If you’re concerned about drugs in South America you need to look at Colombia, not Venezuela :lol:

Maduro is a POS and hopefully Venezuela ends up in a better place, but if the primary factor in this is drugs then it was misguided


quote:

You are incorrect, but that is no surprise. Perhaps you should scope out these things called videos. Some of them are of this stuff called “history.”


There’s your history for you
Musk’s salute was a textbook Nazi salute. He actually did it twice :lol:
Everyone here is polite and whenever two people get to a checkout lane or something similar each person does the politeness dance and insists the other person go first. I shut that down immediately and say that I have two small kids at home and am basically on vacation. Please go ahead of me
quote:

I've been hearing that Josh Heupel is coaching for his job today.


You hear stupid things
quote:

They did they had Daniel Jones and fricked that up too


Letting Darnold go wasn’t the mistake. It was not keeping Jones or finding another quality backup. McCarthy is basically a rookie and keeps getting hurt. They should’ve had one of the best backup QB situations but rolled with Carson Wentz and an undrafted rookie. That was big frickup
Darnold completely imploded last season and wanted a multi year contract. They would’ve had to cut like $20 million to sign him. I totally understand why the Vikings didn’t keep Darnold.

They should’ve had a much better backup situation though
quote:

Mostly tied to Somalians in Minneapolis


quote:

Well before the pandemic, state officials told CBS News that they began experiencing tension with the woman later convicted of masterminding the fraud, Aimee Bock.


Aimee Bock is an interesting Somali name :lol:

re: What’s the rule: paying

Posted by VOLhalla on 12/22/25 at 1:31 pm to
Are asking if it’s ok to pay less for an item because you don’t want to take out your credit card?

If they have a give a penny take a penny situation you use that. If not you use your card
quote:

They have to remove it have the word or image redacted and make sure the word is no longer searchable, the image is for sure not viewable, and then later once cleared add document back if it contains items that can be posted.


The DOJ shat on this argument the minute they reposted the image without redactions :lol:
quote:

And guess what, file 468 is back online with Trump’s 2 images in the desk drawer still there as well as Clinton’s and the pope’s pictures actually on top of the desk. LINK


It’s back up after everyone started talking about the DOJ trying to hide Trump documents. And go look at your link - no redactions on the picture! :lol:

So the DOJ didn’t take the photo down for redactions! Why the hell did the DOJ take that doc away?
quote:

removed due to being notified by an attorney of a victim(s) that something or someone was visible that needs to be redacted


If there is an image of a victim then their image should be redacted. The entire document shouldn’t be pulled/withheld.

Pictures of Epstein with Clinton and victims are produced with the victim’s faces redacted. Pictures of Epstein and Trump and victims are being pulled/withheld. Why the difference?
Her killer also killed other Democrats, had a kill list of even more Democrats, was a registered Republican, was a republican on a bipartisan commission, and all his family said was a very religious, conservative person.

But totally claim he was a democrat you POS :lol:
quote:

Only 1 of those 16 was Trump related with a couple of pictures in drawer of a desk of some kind. Pictures were kind of at angles and overlapped instead of being focused on one at a time (at least what I saw that was described as the file).


The DOJ pulled a photo of just Epstein and Trump from their site. It’s clear the DOJ is under orders to hide anything connecting Trump and Epstein
So many posters with their head in the sand :lol:

It’s proof the DOJ will hide any connection between Trump and Epstein. The DOJ should’ve just let the photos stay on their site. The DOJ was clearly told not to release info about Trump and Epstein, accidentally did, then tried to hide it :lol:

What a frick up :lol:
The associated press reported it too. I even linked it :lol:
What about the photo of Trump and Epstein the DOJ released then took off their website in less than 24 hours :lol:

Explain why that was deleted from the DOJ site