- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:05 am to Mr Cell Phone
Being that economics and awareness is not your strong suit maybe consider staying quiet and unnoticeable might help you better
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:06 am to BayouBlitz
quote:
More agencies. Great.
net reduction idiot. it's a reallocation of resources.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:07 am to Jake88
quote:
More government jobs? For every government job created with this plan, he needs to cut 2 from the IRS.
Not an argument. But considering that Biden provided funding to turn the IRS into an army, I would say that "2" is entirely too low.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:08 am to Proximo
"Foreign sources" pay American tariffs? 
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:10 am to Wolfwireless
quote:I was thinking the same. Just don't know the actual numbers needed for the External Revenue Service.
Not an argument. But considering that Biden provided funding to turn the IRS into an army, I would say that "2" is entirely too low
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:14 am to Jake88
quote:
More government jobs? For every government job created with this plan, he needs to cut 2 from the IRS.
If he is really going to do this, it'll just shift jobs from Border Patrol (who currently administers tariff and duty collection).
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:15 am to Mr Cell Phone
quote:
Why don’t we start by taxing the billionaire and corporations.
Yeah.
Cause they don't already get taxed.
(In case you weren't being sarcastic, there's some from me.)
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:22 am to Proximo
The external revenue service can start with taxing remittances 10% to foreign countries, especially Central and South American countries.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:24 am to Proximo
I guess. Basically a rebrand of a division of another agency. Cool.
This post was edited on 1/14/25 at 11:26 am
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:24 am to Proximo
Another friggin government department !
Why!?
It’ll just become another fiscal blob perverted by future administrations for whatever purpose they choose
Why!?
It’ll just become another fiscal blob perverted by future administrations for whatever purpose they choose
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:26 am to Mr Cell Phone
quote:
Delusional is the only word I will use for this crazy idea
You libs are fricking retards.
quote:
Why don’t we start by taxing the billionaire and corporations.
We do.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:26 am to Giantkiller
I love the idea, but will it make my IRS bill go down? That's what I want to see, not hear.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:27 am to SlidellCajun
Yeah, okay. You're aware Elon is going to DOGE the shite ouf of the government are you not?
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:27 am to GumboPot
quote:
The external revenue service can start with taxing remittances 10% to foreign countries, especially Central and South American countries.
30%
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:28 am to Proximo
quote:
You're aware Elon is going to DOGE the shite ouf of the government are you not?
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:29 am to Violent Hip Swivel
quote:Yes, they actually do. In the case of an untaxed trade deficit, they simply pocket the unassessed profits.
"Foreign sources" pay American tariffs?
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:32 am to BayouBlitz
quote:
More agencies. Great.
Meh. The agency that collects tariffs is already under Treasury. It will really be more a renaming than anything. Mostly rhetorical, but not a big deal either way.
Posted on 1/14/25 at 11:33 am to Proximo
My Freedom Boner can only get so big. 
Popular
Back to top


0







