- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump administration is rolling out nondisclosure agreements for all federal employees
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:38 am
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:38 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.quote:
Bret Baier reports the goal is simple: Stop the deep state from sabotaging the government from within. Agencies can opt out, but the message is clear — no more free-flowing classified info to the media.
11
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:41 am to Ailsa
quote:
Agencies can opt out, but the message is clear — no more free-flowing classified info to the media.
If agencies can opt out... is the message really clear? Why can agencies opt out?
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:44 am to Ailsa
As long as it also comes with clear compliance and whistleblower avenues I don’t have a problem with this. Every company has NDAs for proprietary information.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:45 am to Ailsa
If they are leaking classified information then they are already breaking the law. What is an NDA going to do for this, that current laws already don't?
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:47 am to Ailsa
So signing a piece of paper is the solution ?
How did that work out with that porn star?
How did that work out with that porn star?
This post was edited on 5/27/26 at 10:48 am
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:47 am to mikesliveisacheater
quote:
What is an NDA going to do for this, that current laws already don't?
Easier path to purse them civilly, I guess is the main reason. Much easier to prove that I violated a NDA than I literally broke a law. Fewer due process rights as well.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:47 am to Ailsa
That’s probably not gonna help when they’re all subject to public records requests.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:47 am to Willie Stroker
quote:
that porn star
quote:
Willie Stroker
That checks out.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:49 am to SallysHuman
quote:
agencies can opt out... is the message really clear? Why can agencies opt out?
I would imagine if an agency opts out, it would then not be privy to certain information
Posted on 5/27/26 at 10:51 am to Ailsa
People leak in situations where it is already clearly illegal. Not sure how some civil penalty would change things.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 11:07 am to SquatchDawg
quote:Yep. I retired two years ago and still have NDAs that I signed that are still in-effect. Most were in relation to development projects for defense contractors and involve the national laboratories. So, if I have to honor the discreetness of this data, so too should government employees.
Every company has NDAs for proprietary information.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 11:10 am to Ailsa
The goal is simple - stop talking about Trump and his cronies looting the palace
Posted on 5/27/26 at 11:14 am to Ailsa
quote:
The President Trump administration is rolling out nondisclosure agreements for all federal employees — new hires and current staff — to plug the constant leaks of confidential information.
I'm a tad confused. If leaking classified information... hell... any personally identifying information of any kind.... is already a violation of federal statute.... what good is an NDA going to do?
Posted on 5/27/26 at 11:14 am to Ailsa
quote:
goal is simple: Stop the deep state from sabotaging the government from within.
Federal Government is a disaster. Only way to fix it is burn it all down to the foundation flush out the rats and termites then rebuild it.
It's hard work but we have the instructions for how to do it.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 11:16 am to Ailsa
The billionaires are the deep state. That’s precisely what trump & co are.
It’s trump and the front row vip’s that were at his inauguration.
It’s trump and the front row vip’s that were at his inauguration.
This post was edited on 5/27/26 at 11:17 am
Posted on 5/27/26 at 11:33 am to Ailsa
quote:
is pushback from federal employee unions.
Think a lot of Federal employees were just removed from categories that put them under union representation.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 11:36 am to CleverUserName
quote:
what good is an NDA going to do?
I may be overthinking this, but could the ultimate goal be to use the refusal to sign NDAs as the next step to purge a significant number of federal employees?
Posted on 5/27/26 at 11:40 am to CleverUserName
quote:
I'm a tad confused. If leaking classified information... hell... any personally identifying information of any kind.... is already a violation of federal statute.... what good is an NDA going to do?
It depends on how it's written. The NDA may have serious consequences if it's violated.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 11:57 am to SquatchDawg
quote:
As long as it also comes with clear compliance and whistleblower avenues I don’t have a problem with this.
THIS. You can't use a NDA to curtail reporting fraud or other misconduct.
Posted on 5/27/26 at 3:58 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
Easier path to purse them civilly, I guess is the main reason.
Probably so, just like you can get off on criminal charges for shooting someone in self defense, but can still end up being civilly liable to their estate.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News