re: Today’s SCOTUS Decisions

quote:

---

the Haitian nationals' constitutional claim

---

Its crazy that just anyone can come into this country and start demanding our constitution applies to them

Kagan is incredibly intelligent and thoughtful. Even though I frequently disagree with her, her opinions are always well researched, well argued, and well supported by precedent. If you want to understand progressive views from a non-cultural marxist race-baiter pov, read Kagan SCOTUS opinions.

Sotomayor and Jackson are absolute morons for whom I have zero respect for.

Seems like grounds for impeaching the 3 justices who so flagrantly disregard the Constitution and vote ideologically virtually every time.Thats not how this is supposed to work!

quote:

---

The Wise Latina's dissent is twice as long as the opinion from Alito

---

I’ve always been curious about the nexus of “wise Latina”. Who coined this term? I assume it was originally meant as a compliment but then was hijacked?

And are Latinos known for being particularly wise? An old Chinese guy maybe but I’m not understanding the wise + Latina connection.

quote:

---

I’ve always been curious about the nexus of “wise Latina”. Who coined this term?

---

The phrase "wise Latina" refers to a famous and controversial quote by Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor during a 2001 speech at UC Berkeley School of Law. She stated: "I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

quote:

---

"I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

---

Lol , thanks for that.

I’m reminded of my wise European grandad who would advise, “hope in one hand and shite in the other to see which fills faster”

quote:

---

SFPDS again. Fatigued.

---

Then convince his know-it-all arse to shut up for a second. We’re fatigued.

Agreed. I'm not overly confident, but I am hoping.

I don't have an issue if the ruling is not to my liking based on executive order or some other technicality.

My problem is the number of people who actually like the law the way it is currently interpreted and want nothing to change. There seems to be a lot of those people, which is odd, considering the number of people who favor the SAVE Act. I think a lot of it is people are simply confused and their TDS clouds their judgement and they don't even realize they hold contradictory opinions on these two matters.

quote:

---

border "arrive" 6-3 (9th reversed)

---

“Supreme Court Rules Illegals Outside The US Have Not Arrived In The US”

“The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a non-citizen has to physically enter the boundaries of the U.S. in order to have “arrived in” the country for purposes of asylum.”

This should be obvious to everybody, but of course the 3 liberals voted against it. They legislate from the bench and could care less about the constitution.