- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
deuceiswild
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | South La |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 5232 |
| Registered on: | 11/14/2007 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: USS Abraham Lincoln
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/14/26 at 10:03 pm to AGGIES
Over 5000 people. The overwhelming majority are aged 18-25. And a very large percentage of those are on their first deployment, not qualified to do anything except clean things, paint things, or serve food.
Many people lose their shite on every single deployment when they realize they aren't cut out for navy life. Then they write home sobbing. Now, throw in Trump hating, Karen type parents and suddenly we have a "National issue".
A lot of issues they're having deal with supply ships reaching them. I do not claim to know why only the Lincoln seems to have this issue. Possibly because it's nowhere near the "issue" it's being made out to be?
All that said, neither I, nor anyone else in this thread truly knows what's going on on that ship unless you have family on it who you've heard from recently.
Many people lose their shite on every single deployment when they realize they aren't cut out for navy life. Then they write home sobbing. Now, throw in Trump hating, Karen type parents and suddenly we have a "National issue".
A lot of issues they're having deal with supply ships reaching them. I do not claim to know why only the Lincoln seems to have this issue. Possibly because it's nowhere near the "issue" it's being made out to be?
All that said, neither I, nor anyone else in this thread truly knows what's going on on that ship unless you have family on it who you've heard from recently.
re: Our Country Fights Wars With Too Many Constaints
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/11/26 at 8:11 am to Boom33
quote:
we overthrew their democratic government in 1953 and installed a brutal dictator. 1979 was a rebellion against that government and the US embassy was attacked in that because the guy was our puppet.
I agree with most of how you're laying this out.
I'm curious if you have similar views on Russia attacking Ukraine. Do you believe that was our fault too? Or, stated differently, do you believe Russia acted rationally? For the record, I do believe Russia acted rationally.
re: Our Country Fights Wars With Too Many Constaints
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/11/26 at 7:58 am to UtahCajun
quote:
There is if you are a country that was the driving force behind the laws that says there are war criminals
The so called "rules of war" only exist at the pleasure of the strongest country.
There is merit to both arguments here. It's logical to believe we should live up to our own rules. There's also logic in saying that if your own rules are hampering you due to the opponent not playing by them, then maybe you should change your rules.
re: I've flipped. I'm Pro-Abortion af nowadays
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/11/26 at 7:39 am to Meauxjeaux
I am a pro-choice conservative.
Not for the same reasons as most people who are pro-choice though.
I just prefer to err on the side of not allowing the govt to tell me what I can't do. Not to mention, in order to write a law on abortion, there really is no middle ground that couldn't be considered completely arbitrary. You either have to ban the practice outright, regardless of situation, or you have to allow the practice up to the moment of birth.
Not for the same reasons as most people who are pro-choice though.
I just prefer to err on the side of not allowing the govt to tell me what I can't do. Not to mention, in order to write a law on abortion, there really is no middle ground that couldn't be considered completely arbitrary. You either have to ban the practice outright, regardless of situation, or you have to allow the practice up to the moment of birth.
re: Sacred Right to Seize Homes - or It's Over
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/11/26 at 7:34 am to Night Vision
quote:
I have no sympathy for this happening to the people that voted for him.
Maybe it's just me, but I do not believe this will be happening to the people that voted for him.
re: Openly Communist Democrats are winning primaries all over the place.
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/5/26 at 3:35 pm to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
the fact you think DSA is communist shows how brainwashed you are.
Then what are they? Explain it. How are they different from Communists?
re: The GOP Coalition Moving Forward
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/5/26 at 3:23 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
If in America the socialists try to completely change our form of representative governance, or subjugate the right to political persecution, we can fight.
Yeah? Who will you fight against? And who do you suppose will join your efforts? We already have half the population who doesn't pay taxes. You think those who are receiving the "free" govt services will join you? I mean, shite, I'm going to retire pretty well off with or without social security. And I'd be reluctant to join you if you were fighting only to get rid of that. Most people would happily join in to fight AGAINST you on that issue alone. Government programs NEVER go away. By the time things got so bad that a majority were willing to fight socialism, it would be impossible to even attempt overthrow.
re: The GOP Coalition Moving Forward
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/5/26 at 3:11 pm to theballguy
quote:
I think people including MAGA now trust Trump far less than they did before.
Maybe, but trusting Trump isn't required in this particular battle. He's a lame duck president.
Whoever vows to maintain the border sealed, advocates for passage of the SAVE act, and directly opposes anything and everything DSA/Communist/Muslim related, is on the right side of this fight and should be the clear choice.
re: Every single Democrat is skipping hearing on Muslim Brotherhood
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/5/26 at 2:57 pm to RFK
You make it sound as though somehow those who are against being invaded are the real problem. Are you European?
Being invaded also doesn't seem to bother you much.
Speaking of superior parties... you know what's a superior party than anything that has to do with Muslims invading? The democrats of ten years ago are superior by an incredibly large margin. Democrats of 20 years ago are superior by so much it's hardly measurable...because the democrat party has changed that much. Toothpaste has already been spilled. It ain't going back in the tube. Best we can do is stop spilling more and let what's spilled dry up.
Being invaded also doesn't seem to bother you much.
Speaking of superior parties... you know what's a superior party than anything that has to do with Muslims invading? The democrats of ten years ago are superior by an incredibly large margin. Democrats of 20 years ago are superior by so much it's hardly measurable...because the democrat party has changed that much. Toothpaste has already been spilled. It ain't going back in the tube. Best we can do is stop spilling more and let what's spilled dry up.
re: Matt Walsh on affordability
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/5/26 at 12:33 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Matt Walsh is the Thomas Sowell of sarcasm. And I love him for it.
He's generally my go-to podcast when woke/DEI issues dominate the news.
He's generally my go-to podcast when woke/DEI issues dominate the news.
re: Abolishing the Senate
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/4/26 at 11:13 am to CastleBravo
quote:
Why does this dumb shite keep coming up?
Well, it comes up because there are elected officials, and some who are trying to get elected who are in favor of it.
IMO, it KEEPS coming up, because those democrats who consider themselves "normal" refuse to clean up their own house and allow the message to fester. Likely, because they'll accept anyone and everyone under their tent, as long as they oppose Trump. They fail to realize that at some point they will be beholden to these freaks and owe them favors.
re: Abolishing the Senate
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/4/26 at 11:06 am to weagle1999
quote:
Repeal the 17th.
Agree 100%. But these nutjobs want the entire Senate gone.
Abolishing the Senate
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/4/26 at 10:45 am
We've all heard several democrat elected officials and some trying to get elected advocate for abolishing the Senate.
What is the basis for this?
And how do they plan to do this? Some magical decree? What senator will vote himself out of a job? If we could clone KBJ eight times and put all 9 of them on the SCOTUS, how does even THAT type of court determine that this is constitutional?
What is the basis for this?
And how do they plan to do this? Some magical decree? What senator will vote himself out of a job? If we could clone KBJ eight times and put all 9 of them on the SCOTUS, how does even THAT type of court determine that this is constitutional?
re: Train Wreck In Wisconsin
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/4/26 at 9:34 am to djmed
Sounds like she fits right in to the new democrat party.
re: Question for the socialists/Democrats.
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/4/26 at 9:31 am to BDH72
quote:
You can consider Finland a failed state, I don't know. When I was there , it was a heck of a lot better run than Louisiana, for sure.
They have a small, homogenous population along with no real defense budget.
re: Question for the socialists/Democrats.
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/4/26 at 9:24 am to neverputstheseatdown
quote:
You are starting from the assumption that anyone who supports a social program must be lazy, unwilling to work, or looking for free handouts. That is not an honest way to understand what most of these voters believe.
We are no longer talking about merely supporting a social program. We're well beyond that.
quote:
Most Americans who support policies associated with democratic socialism are not asking the government to abolish private property, eliminate businesses, or take over the entire economy.
I can't speak for most Americans, but I can say with certainty that currently elected officials, and current socialist candidates do indeed support those very things.
quote:
They usually support a mixed economy: private enterprise and capitalism, combined with public programs such as Social Security, Medicare, public schools, roads, police, fire departments, and unemployment insurance.
Cut the crap regarding roads, fire departments, and police. Those are not the issues here, and they never have been. Neither are public schools and social security, for that matter.
quote:
You can disagree with Medicare for All, higher taxes, stronger unions, tuition assistance, or expanded welfare programs without assuming that everyone supporting them is stupid or lazy. Many of them work, pay taxes, and simply believe government should provide a stronger safety net and place more limits on concentrated corporate power.
Thank you. I disagree with all of those. And a significant of the support for all of them does indeed come from a sense of entitlement and laziness.
quote:
Capitalism has produced enormous innovation and prosperity, but completely unregulated capitalism has also produced monopolies, exploitation, financial crises, unsafe workplaces, and severe inequality. Socialism in its fully centralized form has generally performed poorly and often become authoritarian. That is why nearly every successful modern economy uses some combination of markets, regulation, and social programs.
You are not describing capitalism. You're describing crony capitalism, which I admit we have a lot of. The solution isn't to finish destroying what's left of capitalism in favor of socialism. The solution is electing people who will drive us back toward a more pure capitalism.
quote:
I would rather debate the actual proposals, their costs, their incentives, and whether they work than insult millions of people and pretend they all want something for nothing. You may still conclude that Bernie Sanders or AOC is wrong, but understanding their supporters requires addressing what they actually believe rather than the most insulting caricature of it
Then go ahead. Explain to everyone the benefits of abolishing the Senate, abolishing private property, abolishing our borders, abolishing prisons, state ownership of most private industry, govt run grocery stores, etc. And while we're at it, explain the benefits of allowing Muslims to overrun entire cities, because this is all tied together. I admit that I cannot eloquently explain the precise connections, but it seems obvious to me.
And yes, I read your post carefully. You're attempting to sound reasonable. But it's obvious that you have some sort of affinity for many of these socialist ideas. And you're framing this as though it's only minor changes for the overall good. To that I'd say you're naive and you're fighting a battle that doesn't exist. We have well passed the point in which you think we are. We have SEVERAL actual socialists and a few communists already elected, and more running for office. At which point does it become too much? At which point do "normal" democrats become beholden to these people?
re: Texas halting approval of Data Centers until audits are completed!
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/4/26 at 9:00 am to America250
quote:
How is the state going to provide enough water without draining aquifers depleting water needed for homes, farming, etc?
How many more surcharges can Entergy add to our electric bills, on top of the already hurricane charges.
?
Data centers should prove they can provide their own power and water, without the costs being passed on to louisiana citizens.
What makes you so certain the state will be "providing water" to them? What is your definition of "providing water"? If a data center takes river water onto its facility for a once-through cooling system, then puts it back in the river, is that considered "providing water" to you? Or do you think they will simply take and consume millions of gallons per day, and we never see it again?
re: Question for the biggest Trump supporters out there - Iran War
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/3/26 at 3:52 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
I expect that we’ll eventually end it and Trump will claim victory no matter what the reality is.
I will still not believe him.
If that's truly what you EXPECT and you will still not believe him, then I SUSPECT that this was always your belief since the first bombs were dropped. A total surrender by Iran would somehow not change your mind.
Today's Democrat mindset/predicament
Posted by deuceiswild on 7/30/26 at 11:34 am
"A couple decades ago some old socialist guy from Vermont was elected to the US senate as a Democrat. I didn’t say anything because he was only one, of a hundred, and I’m not even from Vermont. Plus, it was fun to correct those stupid conservatives who kept calling him a communist. I never acknowledge that the guys a socialist, I simply correct people for calling him a communist. Also, I kinda don’t mind him being a socialist, as long as he always votes against those darn conservatives. Those idiots actually thought we’d become a communist country.
Over the last decade, a handful of districts elected open socialists to the US Hoise of Representatives as democrats. I didn’t say anything because they were only a few of over four hundred, and I’m not even from those districts. Plus, it was more fun to correct those stupid conservatives who kept calling them communists. I never admit that those people are socialists, I simply correct people for calling them communists. Also, I kinda don’t mind them being socialists, as long as they always vote against those darn conservatives. Those idiots still think we’re becoming a communist country.
More recently, a few major American cities elected open socialists posing as democrats to the office of mayor. I didn’t say anything because it’s only a few cities, and I don’t even live in any of them. Plus, it was always more fun to correct those stupid conservatives who kept calling them communists. I never admit that those people are socialists, I simply correct people for calling them communists. Also, I kinda don’t mind them being socialists, as long as they always vote against those darn conservatives. I can’t believe those idiots still think we’re becoming a communist country.
You see, other than getting myself off by correcting you on the definition of communism, what this is really about is democrats getting control back. I mean, that's just politics.
And sure, once we get that control back, we will be beholden to our new non-communist friends. There will be too many of them to ignore. We'll owe them some favors. We will help them push for some minor changes, but by and large we will still be the same ole democrats.
We will want to abolish the senate. We will want to abolish prisons and police. We'll want to strip funding to the pentagon. We'll want most major corporations to be run by the govt. Universal Basic Income will be on our radar. And We think we should probably pack the SCOTUS.
This stuff probably won't even be that bad. You'll hardly notice. Besides, it can't possibly be any worse than what Trump is doing to this country. So lighten up, Francis. We aren't going communist! Only a very small step in the direction of socialism. And that's way different. And way better!"
Over the last decade, a handful of districts elected open socialists to the US Hoise of Representatives as democrats. I didn’t say anything because they were only a few of over four hundred, and I’m not even from those districts. Plus, it was more fun to correct those stupid conservatives who kept calling them communists. I never admit that those people are socialists, I simply correct people for calling them communists. Also, I kinda don’t mind them being socialists, as long as they always vote against those darn conservatives. Those idiots still think we’re becoming a communist country.
More recently, a few major American cities elected open socialists posing as democrats to the office of mayor. I didn’t say anything because it’s only a few cities, and I don’t even live in any of them. Plus, it was always more fun to correct those stupid conservatives who kept calling them communists. I never admit that those people are socialists, I simply correct people for calling them communists. Also, I kinda don’t mind them being socialists, as long as they always vote against those darn conservatives. I can’t believe those idiots still think we’re becoming a communist country.
You see, other than getting myself off by correcting you on the definition of communism, what this is really about is democrats getting control back. I mean, that's just politics.
And sure, once we get that control back, we will be beholden to our new non-communist friends. There will be too many of them to ignore. We'll owe them some favors. We will help them push for some minor changes, but by and large we will still be the same ole democrats.
We will want to abolish the senate. We will want to abolish prisons and police. We'll want to strip funding to the pentagon. We'll want most major corporations to be run by the govt. Universal Basic Income will be on our radar. And We think we should probably pack the SCOTUS.
This stuff probably won't even be that bad. You'll hardly notice. Besides, it can't possibly be any worse than what Trump is doing to this country. So lighten up, Francis. We aren't going communist! Only a very small step in the direction of socialism. And that's way different. And way better!"
re: Louisiana seeking to store Nuclear Waste under the Gulf.
Posted by deuceiswild on 7/30/26 at 11:11 am to AUMIS01
Who's going to reprocess it? Who here has the equipment to do that? Why would anyone invest the money here to reprocess fuel when the next admin can always decimate your business on a whim?
Note: I'm aware that there are locations in the us that have the ability to do it. But no one has the capacity to reprocess on the scale you're talking about.
Note: I'm aware that there are locations in the us that have the ability to do it. But no one has the capacity to reprocess on the scale you're talking about.
re: Why is it....
Posted by deuceiswild on 7/21/26 at 10:36 pm to greygoose
Only logical answer (not that I agree) is they think the person deserves more due process.
Popular
0












