- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
deuceiswild
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | South La |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 5055 |
| Registered on: | 11/14/2007 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: One of TRUMPS greatest teachings.....
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/22/26 at 8:52 pm to oldskule
I agree, but only to a point. I think he had to learn during his first term. I think he initially underestimated the magnitude of the human filth in DC.
re: Polk Country FL sheriff catching heat for mocking tranny prostitutes caught in sting
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/22/26 at 8:46 pm to L.A.
It's funny but he leads me to believe that it would all be okay if it were a more honest form of prostitution lol
re: Woman shoots two lawyers outside NC courthouse
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/22/26 at 6:47 pm to High C
quote:
Yep, I think people like Gordon and Morris Bart are the scum of the earth. They don’t deserve to be shot, though.
I get the gist here, and I want to agree.
But are they really scum? Personally, I'd prefer to put that label on our state officials who allow them to do what they do and to make to so profitable.
It's like lobbyists in Washington. Should we really blame them? Or should we instead blame our elected officials for taking what amounts to bribes from them?
re: Obama judge drops human trafficking charges against Maryland man
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/22/26 at 6:40 pm to CAD703X
Is he still in El Savador without the ability to come back?
If so, IDGAF. They can give him a medal for all I care.
Edit: disregard. I thought they sent him away for a second time. Evidently they didn't.
If so, IDGAF. They can give him a medal for all I care.
Edit: disregard. I thought they sent him away for a second time. Evidently they didn't.
re: Poor Panicans have to see 50k all weekend
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/22/26 at 6:36 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
That same trend is why the GOP will be taken out back and beaten in November. Trump and company are cutting off their nose to spite their face.
I agree this will likely happen. But as long as B Sanders, AOC, Mamdani, K Harris, etc. are the leading voices in the democrat party it will be a short lived victory lasting two yrs at most.
re: Francesca Hong, a leading Democrat in the Wisconsin governor’s race
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/22/26 at 1:21 pm to i am dan
quote:
I can't fathom how fricking stupid these leftist politicians can be.
I can fathom it. It's who they are. At least they're honest about it.
The issue to me, is the current Democratic Party is either consciously choosing to not call them out and accept them, or they're afraid to do so.
But either way, they had better do something soon to squash this crap, else they will no longer exist as a party. B Sanders, Mamdani, AOC, Waltz... these are all already huge voices within the party. At what point does it become too much for them? Or will they cave in and become them?
My faith is generally low in the American population when it comes to choosing an electorate. But as of today, I maintain a confidence that Americans do not want this. I do not see taking this path working out well for the democrat party.
re: About this ballroom
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/21/26 at 1:42 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:
I hated when Clinton and Obama sold out the White House. I hated when Biden sold access to Ukraine or anyone who would pay for his son’s shakedown demands. I hate this too.
I didn’t vote for this.
That's a fair position to have.
As long as you weren't "quietly upset" about those examples while being "totally outraged" and losing your shite when Trump is doing it.
re: Do libs celebrate 250?
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/21/26 at 11:14 am to braves21
I fully expect a few thousand retards in DC the week of July 4th trying shite on the rest of our parade.
re: Ok its time to start dropping bombs again on Iran.
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/21/26 at 11:11 am to UtahCajun
quote:
But to begin a protracted conflict, just because an ally was gonna do it anyway, with no clear goals set, was foolish.
A part of Iran's retaliation was going to be OUR bases in the ME regardless. So why not be proactive? We were going to be drawn in no matter what, imo.
We could have pressured Isreal to not start this, but can you really blame them for having the desire and the willingness to do so? Could we even have prevented them had we tried? Maybe. But who really knows for sure?
re: Ok its time to start dropping bombs again on Iran.
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/21/26 at 10:58 am to LSUPilot07
I feel like tomorrow afternoon is a good possibility. Markets close, plus a holiday on Monday.
re: Ben Shapiro’s take on Massie
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/21/26 at 10:56 am to Deuces
I don't hate Shapiro. He's still sane. I wish he talked slower. But I kinda like him.
He used to be my go-to podcast for anything foreign affairs related....unless it involved Israel. So, I haven't been listening much lately.
I do agree with his take on Massie though. I heard it yesterday.
He used to be my go-to podcast for anything foreign affairs related....unless it involved Israel. So, I haven't been listening much lately.
I do agree with his take on Massie though. I heard it yesterday.
re: Ro Khanna Statement
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/20/26 at 6:42 am to DeBoar
I fully support this with all sincerity. He should go be a "populist democrat".
re: Where does this rank on the Biden/ Burisma scale of corruption?
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/19/26 at 9:24 pm to boosiebadazz
I think it's a terrible precedent. It's a bad look for Trump.
Hard to blame him, but it's a bad look.
My personal feelings on it are that maybe I now realize why we get these shitty African American female mayors in big cities. They don't care if she steals. They don't care if she does nothing for the people of the city. Hell, they don't even care if she makes literally everything worse. The bottom line is that they've finally "made it". One of theirs is in on the grift and they get pleasure from all the stupid crackers crying about it.
It's the same here in some ways. Yeah, it's shitty. But "my guy" is getting in on the bullshite now. And I love seeing democrats cry about it.
I'm not proud to feel that way. But at least I'm honest.
Hard to blame him, but it's a bad look.
My personal feelings on it are that maybe I now realize why we get these shitty African American female mayors in big cities. They don't care if she steals. They don't care if she does nothing for the people of the city. Hell, they don't even care if she makes literally everything worse. The bottom line is that they've finally "made it". One of theirs is in on the grift and they get pleasure from all the stupid crackers crying about it.
It's the same here in some ways. Yeah, it's shitty. But "my guy" is getting in on the bullshite now. And I love seeing democrats cry about it.
I'm not proud to feel that way. But at least I'm honest.
re: Retiring at 50 with $2MM in savings
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/19/26 at 9:17 pm to xBirdx
My apologies.
That said, it can still be done, but it would be much harder. Youd need a high paying job and/or be single with no kids.
You'd have to dedicate after tax dollars which makes it harder to do. You also don't get the company match, but in my case our match is not as high as most. It's less than 5%.
You'd likely not be also saving in any retirement accounts unless you lived in a cardboard box or in your dads basement.
So I'll change my stance a little. While technically possible, it would require circumstances that make it practically impossible for most people.
That said, it can still be done, but it would be much harder. Youd need a high paying job and/or be single with no kids.
You'd have to dedicate after tax dollars which makes it harder to do. You also don't get the company match, but in my case our match is not as high as most. It's less than 5%.
You'd likely not be also saving in any retirement accounts unless you lived in a cardboard box or in your dads basement.
So I'll change my stance a little. While technically possible, it would require circumstances that make it practically impossible for most people.
re: Senate advances legislation to stop military action-thanks Cassidy
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/19/26 at 5:03 pm to bigjoe1
This gives the president an off ramp, IMO. Not sure he will use it, and I'm not sure I want him to use it.
But it does give him an off ramp and the ability to blame others.
But it does give him an off ramp and the ability to blame others.
re: The lying and catastrophizing regarding AI Data Centers is reaching critical mass
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/19/26 at 5:00 pm to HighlyFavoredTiger
All of this is true, but it doesn't have to be this way (leakage, blowdown, etc).
We have several closed cooling loops where I am right now. Of the two that come to mind, one is about 5400 gal and the other is 50,000 gal. Both with automatic makeup. The smaller one made up once in the last 30 days. The larger one, about three times per week. A single makeup is about 20 gallons.
The reason? They're safety related and therefore regulated. We take care of them with proper chemistry and maintenance. And it isn't cheap.
There is also a third system I am thinking of that's at least 50,000 gallons, but I'd guess it's bigger. It's not safety related, doesn't get the same scrutiny, and yet it makes up even less than the others.
We have several closed cooling loops where I am right now. Of the two that come to mind, one is about 5400 gal and the other is 50,000 gal. Both with automatic makeup. The smaller one made up once in the last 30 days. The larger one, about three times per week. A single makeup is about 20 gallons.
The reason? They're safety related and therefore regulated. We take care of them with proper chemistry and maintenance. And it isn't cheap.
There is also a third system I am thinking of that's at least 50,000 gallons, but I'd guess it's bigger. It's not safety related, doesn't get the same scrutiny, and yet it makes up even less than the others.
re: Retirement at 55 questions
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/19/26 at 4:06 pm to RedlandsTiger
quote:
What's the note per month? If you pay it off, you have the note amount for living expenses.
The mortgage payment is not what matters to me here. It's the interest rate, which is not the lowest, but still fairly low.
I believe I'd prefer having that money invested and working for me, rather than write a check that size just to pay it off.
I'm open to other lines of thought, however.
re: Retirement at 55 questions
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/19/26 at 4:02 pm to KillTheGophers
quote:
Take the lump sum and don’t look back.
This is most likely what I will be doing. Currently my plans revolve around this option. I work with some really smart people. I mean genuinely smart people. I've watched a lot of them retire over the years and I don't recall a single one of them who didn't take the lump sum. And they all justified their decision with various reasons that made perfect sense to me. At least it did at the time. But trust me, things are different when it's YOUR turn to make that decision.
That said, I have to admit that a guaranteed payment for life sounds very safe in some ways, assuming it's enough. It takes some of the guess work of worrying about how long you'll live out of the equation.
re: Retiring at 50 with $2MM in savings
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/19/26 at 3:30 pm to xBirdx
quote:
It’s almost impossible to have $2mm in cash at 50
Not true at all, as has been said a few times already.
But to add some perspective, I didn't start my 401K till age 32. I did max it out every year since then. No catch-up payments over the last few yrs or anything fancy. I just maxed it out every year.
I am now 53 with $1.45M in that account (and we don't even have a very wide selection of funds to invest in). I plan to continue to max it out for my remaining two years.
I feel 100% certain that if I were able to start saving 7 or 8 yrs earlier while in my early 20s, I'd easily have over $2M in there. Probably significantly more than $2M.
re: Retiring at 50 with $2MM in savings
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/19/26 at 2:51 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Why?
Probably because going back to work at 60 isn't supposed to be part of the plan. And that's what would likely happen barring some amazing market growth.
I mean, I'll be 55 when I retire and will have slightly more than the OP...5 less years to live, and slightly more money. And no way in hell will I be able to afford to "travel the world and live up life". At least not in the way that I define "travelling the world and living up life". To me that means multiple, probably at least three, overseas trips per year in addition to local travel and entertainment. Maybe you have a different perspective of it.
re: Detroit or Baltimore?
Posted by deuceiswild on 5/19/26 at 2:25 pm to Louisiana Gator
Go to Baltimore. Once there, immediately head to Washington DC by train or plane. Enjoy visiting the nations capitol for a day or two, and then watch the game from a local bar/pub or from your hotel room.
Popular
0












