- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
deuceiswild
| Favorite team: | LSU |
| Location: | South La |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 5275 |
| Registered on: | 11/14/2007 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: This color guy is an idiot
Posted by deuceiswild on 10/3/26 at 9:00 pm to The Eric
Color guy?
So racist! Wtf?
So racist! Wtf?
re: Alabama is good but not great. Why are some of us scared?
Posted by deuceiswild on 10/3/26 at 1:30 pm to GeauxLaneTrain
Scared is a strong word. Concerned would be better. Why?
Maybe because we too are good but not great?
Maybe because we too are good but not great?
re: Conference Self Governance Will Fail
Posted by deuceiswild on 10/1/26 at 8:42 am to misey94
quote:
The NCAA is attempting to get some of its power back with its current bill before Congress, but even with it passing they wouldn’t have the stability of the NFL with its CBA. And the conferences currently have even less stability and no current path to an antitrust exception.
I don't disagree with this. IMO, the college players will eventually organize. The NCAA or the conferences will have rigid rules set in place, and those will be hashed out between the governing body and the players organization.
re: Conference Self Governance Will Fail
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/30/26 at 3:09 pm to pelicanpride
quote:
I’ve been trying to think of a scenario where direct competitors within a multi-billion-dollar enterprise, actively police and enforce penalties on one another, and I can’t think of a single one. There’s probably a reason you don’t see this type of thing. The enterprise will self-destruct.
The NFL.
re: Conference Self Governance Will Fail
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/30/26 at 3:08 pm to pelicanpride
quote:
They may agree on the rules, but when it comes to enforcement, every school has an incentive to bury a rival—especially a traditional power.
I don't disagree with the gist of your post, and that self-governance will fail.
Just not for this reason.
You can only kick out so many rivals or have only so many leave your conference. At best you'd merely have teams switching conferences every few years and it's just a matter of time before someone who may have voted you out years ago is now forced to vote you back in. Money drives all of this. You need opponents that fans are vested in seeing you compete against. That's how you score the big TV deals.
The Saints and Atlanta are rivals in the NFL... but neither wants to put the other out of business. That would be counterproductive. It's very similar with conferences.
re: Big Corn is a problem that doesn’t get talked about enough…
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/28/26 at 6:41 am to burger bearcat
Same with sugar in this state.
We need to phase out sugar farming in Louisiana.
We'd have cheaper land, better roads, and even though it isn't incredibly expensive, we'd be paying half of what we pay not for sugar.
And maybe we can get a coke with real sugar in it. It's ridiculous you have to leave the US in order to get one of the most American of American products as it was meant to be.
We need to phase out sugar farming in Louisiana.
We'd have cheaper land, better roads, and even though it isn't incredibly expensive, we'd be paying half of what we pay not for sugar.
And maybe we can get a coke with real sugar in it. It's ridiculous you have to leave the US in order to get one of the most American of American products as it was meant to be.
re: Navy says 8 sailors aboard the Lincoln attempted suicide
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/24/26 at 12:15 pm to geauxpurple
Because some of them want to be discharged and never had any true intent on taking their own life. Only the appearance of such.
re: Navy says 8 sailors aboard the Lincoln attempted suicide
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/24/26 at 12:11 pm to OysterPoBoy
This is all an attempt to make Hegseth look bad. The senator likely heard about the eight attempts from a credible source, then asked the Navy Sec about it just to get it in his own writing to use for political purposes.
Carrier deployments always have suicide attempts. I'd be more surprised if none were successful.
Some sailors are on their first deployment and soon realize navy life isn't for them. Others receive Dear John letters. Some lose parents or siblings while deployed and don't take the news well. Some are just crazy. And likely many other reasons as well for someone to attempt suicide.
Often times there are even deaths of natural causes during deployments.
Carrier deployments always have suicide attempts. I'd be more surprised if none were successful.
Some sailors are on their first deployment and soon realize navy life isn't for them. Others receive Dear John letters. Some lose parents or siblings while deployed and don't take the news well. Some are just crazy. And likely many other reasons as well for someone to attempt suicide.
Often times there are even deaths of natural causes during deployments.
re: Everybody is banging on the O and Leavit.
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/20/26 at 10:08 am to OvertheDwayneBowe
quote:
I fail to see how LSU's offense let OM's offense go 7-9 on 3rd down in the first half.
Giving up nine plays (I think) for 20+ yds didn't help us either.
re: Jones is a Stud
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/20/26 at 8:29 am to GeekedUp
Especially when he's used. We didn't bother trying to run much till the second quarter.
re: Found this legal post on the lawsuit against LSU.
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/4/26 at 9:53 am to Russianblue
quote:
Notably, the SEC explicitly says it is not asking the court to declare any student-athlete ineligible or to prevent any student-athlete from competing. The suit targets only the institution and its officials.
Anyone who buys into this line of reasoning probably thought it was totally reasonable when people were told "no one's forcing you to get the shot." I mean sure you'll lose your job, you might be denied medical care, and maybe even jailed. But no one's forcing you.
re: Does LSU have a case for Damages against the SEC
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/4/26 at 7:55 am to Pedropatterstine
Cooler heads need to prevail and all 16 institutions need a come to Jesus moment and just stop all the BS.
Either the class of 2022 is eligible or they aren't. That needs to be the agreement.
Whether a guy got drafted, participated in minicamp, went through training camp, played in preseason games.... just toss all the crap aside.
I do not think they should play. But it isn't my decision.
Either the class of 2022 is eligible or they aren't. That needs to be the agreement.
Whether a guy got drafted, participated in minicamp, went through training camp, played in preseason games.... just toss all the crap aside.
I do not think they should play. But it isn't my decision.
re: No American Response to Last Two Bombing Campaigns from Iran
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/3/26 at 3:09 pm to Wwarmouth
I often try putting myself in people like your shoes. Meaning, what if the president were a Democrat that I despised, and we were in this same war with Iran? How would I feel?
I'd be pissed, if I truly felt we were "close to waving the white flag". And since it's out of my control but I felt I still needed to vent, I may even come here to do that. I'd express my frustrations and get it out my system as best I can. I may even argue with supporters of the president. That's what pissed off people do when things are fully out of their control.
But you... you're not pissed at all. In fact, your tone suggests that you're giddy. A pissed off person expresses their anger in no uncertain terms. A pissed off person is beyond the point where he feels he needs to goad and provoke others.
This proves beyond any doubt that your primary concern isn't with the war at all. The war is just the means toward the ends of seeing the president look bad. Tomorrow it'll be a different "outrage".
So which is it? Are you giddy? Or just an immature child?
I'd be pissed, if I truly felt we were "close to waving the white flag". And since it's out of my control but I felt I still needed to vent, I may even come here to do that. I'd express my frustrations and get it out my system as best I can. I may even argue with supporters of the president. That's what pissed off people do when things are fully out of their control.
But you... you're not pissed at all. In fact, your tone suggests that you're giddy. A pissed off person expresses their anger in no uncertain terms. A pissed off person is beyond the point where he feels he needs to goad and provoke others.
This proves beyond any doubt that your primary concern isn't with the war at all. The war is just the means toward the ends of seeing the president look bad. Tomorrow it'll be a different "outrage".
So which is it? Are you giddy? Or just an immature child?
re: For Those Of You Opposed To Data Centers, What Is Your Plan?
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/2/26 at 4:01 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
There are no easy answers. We should as one race realize that this is an alien threat.....as alien as anything from the far reaches of the galaxy, that we are welcoming to our world. It doesnt matter if China builds it or we build it first. The potential threat remains the same.
The answer is to keep building them as needed and as fast as possible.
In the meantime, maybe you can lobby for a team of mediators between the worlds countries to come to some sort of agreement on how far to take things.
re: For Those Of You Opposed To Data Centers, What Is Your Plan?
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/2/26 at 3:58 pm to FredBear
Well, I got google earth open right now. That road isn't very long. There is already a giant Amazon Sortation Center, an Amazon warehouse, and a Club Car LLC (which seems like a very large operation.. going by building size). I wonder why they were okay with these things being right next door?
I have no issue with people opposing this. That's their right. Maybe they simply don't want more large industrial type facilities in the area. But they have no real leg to stand on it seems.
The people in the article you linked seem more butthurt than anything else. Their reasoning is all sentimental (not that it really matters, I suppose). I'd not be surprised if they themselves aren't the ones who sold their land to Amazon after it being in their family for over a century.
Also, while I am always in favor of protecting the smallest minority (which is ONE), this is more a case of a dozen or so homeowners spread out along a country road, rather than what most people would consider a "neighborhood".
I have no issue with people opposing this. That's their right. Maybe they simply don't want more large industrial type facilities in the area. But they have no real leg to stand on it seems.
The people in the article you linked seem more butthurt than anything else. Their reasoning is all sentimental (not that it really matters, I suppose). I'd not be surprised if they themselves aren't the ones who sold their land to Amazon after it being in their family for over a century.
Also, while I am always in favor of protecting the smallest minority (which is ONE), this is more a case of a dozen or so homeowners spread out along a country road, rather than what most people would consider a "neighborhood".
re: For Those Of You Opposed To Data Centers, What Is Your Plan?
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/2/26 at 3:12 pm to FredBear
quote:
It simply means I don't want it next door to me. And yes, where I'm at they're going to build a couple right next to some neighborhoods despite the vast majority of the residents opposed to it.
Taking you at your word, honestly, I'd oppose it too.
That said, "right next to" means different things to different people. I'll assume there's a lake or river near the site. Any other industry already there?
re: For Those Of You Opposed To Data Centers, What Is Your Plan?
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/2/26 at 3:06 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
Environmental impacts are a secondary concern that may be able to be mitigated(data centers in space maybe) . The main concern is that the human race is marching towards building something that could end our species.
Even if we assume this is correct, how does opposing datacenters prevent the end of humanity?
You think China is going to stop?
re: For Those Of You Opposed To Data Centers, What Is Your Plan?
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/2/26 at 2:58 pm to FredBear
quote:
I'm fine with it if you want them built next to your house. Just keep them away from mine.
What does this mean? Do you think they're building these things in residential neighborhoods?
What if there's a lot of acreage behind your nearest Lowes and Walmart? Is that acceptable? Or does that depend on how far it is from your house?
What if it's built out by your nearest power plant? Is that acceptable? Or does that too depend on how far it is from your house?
re: For Those Of You Opposed To Data Centers, What Is Your Plan?
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/2/26 at 2:52 pm to LuckyTiger
I think most people simply don't understand. Low information.
I have zero issues with them as long as they're paying for or building their own power supply.
I have zero issues with them as long as they're paying for or building their own power supply.
re: Trump Proposes Renaming the Strait of Hormuz
Posted by deuceiswild on 9/2/26 at 12:04 pm to BoarEd
Wiggling that laser pointer bigly and watching the media and TDS folk go insane trying to catch it lol
re: Elections are pointless until term limits are applied
Posted by deuceiswild on 8/31/26 at 7:49 pm to OWLFAN86
I agree with you. Beaurocrats would simply wait out elected officials. Beaurocrats would gain power if term limits were enacted.
Popular
0












