Started By
Message

re: There is a big fight on X about Josh Hammer calling for Tucker to be “neutralized”.

Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:47 am to
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
20475 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Fuentes is a shitbird.

I don’t agree with Fuentes on much.

But I don’t think he should be “neutralized”.

A country that “neutralizes” people who disagree with them politically is no longer a republic, it’s an authoritarian state.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125506 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:47 am to
His usage of “neutralized” is weird and he knows better. I’m not sure there’s even plausible deniability there.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125506 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:48 am to
All we have to do with Fuentes is let more people hear him. The incels like him.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
85994 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:53 am to
quote:

In the interview with Tucker. Fuentes said that he told Trump that he would "Die for him." at the Mar-a-lago dinner. He also spoke very highly about Trump


On his own show he hasn’t. Encouraged people not to vote for him.


Which means he was willing to have Harris as president even if he didn’t endorse her.


That’s that young dumb libertarian shite coming through. Oh Trump will only do 3/4 of what I want so I can’t vote for him.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
125506 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:58 am to
It really means that he’s saying anything that will get him attention.

And his fanboys will pretend that he’s deeper than we all think just like Rick and Morty fans.
Posted by dukkbill
Member since Aug 2012
1039 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 7:59 am to
quote:

Josh Hammer calls for Tucker Carlson to be neutralized


Please Hammer, Don't hurt em
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296763 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:01 am to
quote:


I don’t agree with Fuentes on much.

But I don’t think he should be “neutralized”.
\

Agree. But after hearing him talk, I dont know how any baw is attracted to him or his messages. He's so fake and phony.

Posted by 632627
LA
Member since Dec 2011
14673 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:10 am to
quote:


Agree. But after hearing him talk, I dont know how any baw is attracted to him or his messages. He's so fake and phony.


Someone described him as a shock jock, and I think that's accurate.

He's said some wild and vile shite that'll never allow him to become a mainstream political figure. He'll have his loyal internet following, but he'll be completely tuned out by everyone else.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10560 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:12 am to
quote:

Josh Hammer is a legal scholar and former federal law clerk. If he wanted to euphemistically call for the death of Tucker Carlson, he would have used a different word. Neutralize does not mean or connote killing or death.


Yet if any Democrat had said exactly the same thing no one—including yourself—would be defending it.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
20475 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:17 am to
quote:

All we have to do with Fuentes is let more people hear him. The incels like him.

We have an entire generation of disaffected males without girlfriends or great career prospects.

They’re angry and are going to be looking for people to blame and a movement to latch onto that provides them a social identity and value.

If we don’t provide them a positive outlet they’ll find a negative one.

But even then if we are who we saw we are (a free speech republic) we shouldn’t be advocating for people to be neutralized, jailed or killed because we don’t like their ideas.

Personally I believe this is just more evidence to support the axiom that if you want to know who’s actually in control just figure out who you aren’t allowed to criticize.

To me that appears to be the Israel lobby and MIC in DC, the LGBT lobby on the left and AI/pharma/tech everywhere else.
Posted by jlnoles79
Member since Jan 2014
14245 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:17 am to
quote:

But after hearing him talk, I dont know how any baw is attracted to him or his messages. He's so fake and phony.



Jew hatred and nothing more
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
296763 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:19 am to
quote:


Jew hatred and nothing more


Probably.
Posted by Hester Carries
Member since Sep 2012
25126 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:21 am to
quote:

For a kid who probably never has never read Tolkien & thinks George Martin’s Game of Thrones is superior to Lord of the Rings, of course he’s going to misuse a Tolkien character. And he so fundamentally doesn’t understand memes, which puts him squarely on the side of the left.


Bro he didn’t type that transcript. He spoke it. He said golem. No says “A Gollum”. He wasn’t talking about LOTR.
Posted by CrimsonTideMD
Member since Dec 2010
7111 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:27 am to
quote:

Just admit that you don’t like Josh because he’s part of the tribe.


I don’t like Mike Huckabee or Ted Cruz because they’re both !srael First traitorous bastards

I dislike Hammer for the same reason.

Don’t GAF what tribe any of them belong to.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
20475 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:28 am to
quote:

Seems like Hammer should just say he used a poor choice of words and move on.

I don’t think he believes it was a poor choice of words.

I think he conveyed exactly what he meant to convey without using a word that would actually cause him to suffer consequences for using it.

He wants to silence people he doesn’t agree with using force because he can’t discredit them using logic and reasoning.

He’s just too cowardly and weak to do it himself so he’s calling for someone else with less (in his mind) to lose to do it for him.
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28137 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:30 am to
I feel sure I would be appropriately outraged if I knew who the frick Josh Hammer was.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
26931 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:33 am to
quote:

There is a big fight on X


Perfect example of the forum trend.
Posted by CrimsonTideMD
Member since Dec 2010
7111 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:33 am to
quote:

He's said some wild and vile shite that'll never allow him to become a mainstream political figure. He'll have his loyal internet following, but he'll be completely tuned out by everyone else.


Yet another dogshit take by NPC 632627

Fuentes numbers continue to grow despite his having been deplatformed and debanked.

If you’re tuning him out, you’re just burying your head in the sand.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42561 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 8:58 am to
Fair enough, but I don’t believe he even knows the difference.

I went with what was written.
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
5099 posts
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:17 am to
quote:

4) Comes off too hateful to Jewish people simply for being Jews. I have no issue with calling out Israel and our relationship, etc. But he seems to take it to the next level


How do you separate Israel from Jews?

And what is it about the relationship that makes it worth “calling out Israel”?

Why is the relationship the way it is?

Isnt it, at a macro level, because white people won’t criticize Jews?

I’m not saying we should hate Jews, I’m saying we should notice patterns wherever we see them.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram