Started By
Message

re: The U.S. national debt now exceeds 100% of gross domestic product

Posted on 4/30/26 at 9:55 am to
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63805 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 9:55 am to
quote:

From my head.


Hmm. From the WSJ:

quote:

As of March 31, the country’s publicly held debt was $31.265 trillion, while GDP over the preceding year was $31.216 trillion, according to data released Thursday. That puts the ratio at 100.2%, compared with 99.5% when the last fiscal year ended Sept. 30.


Now I’m not saying that the WSJ is infallible, but if forced to choose between the data in their article and the information in wdhalgren‘s head on Tigerdroppings, I’m going to have to lean toward the WSJ.
Posted by Azkiger
Member since Nov 2016
28172 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 9:55 am to
quote:

4cubbies


Not too active.

Anyone know if 4chubby bitched about SNAP not covering sugary snacks? What about USAID cuts?
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5331 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 9:57 am to
quote:

the country’s publicly held debt was $31.265 trillion



quote:

Now I’m not saying that the WSJ is infallible, but if forced to choose between the data in their article and the information in wdhalgren‘s head on Tigerdroppings, I’m going to have to lean toward the WSJ.


Lean however you please. Debt held by the public is not the entirety of US fed gov debt. The total FedGov debt is greater than $39T. As you point out, the WSJ is not infallible. But even more importantly, they are not unbiased when it comes to what they choose to publish. That includes statistics.
This post was edited on 4/30/26 at 10:04 am
Posted by RobertFootball
SC
Member since Mar 2021
2635 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 10:20 am to
Everywhere!
Posted by Average_Comments
ATX
Member since Jan 2024
290 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 10:21 am to
And no one cares.... especially not the politicians
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98258 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 10:22 am to
Thanks Conservatives and Beta male liberals like the OP
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
63805 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 10:22 am to
I see what you’re saying, but this isn’t some nefarious choice by the WSJ. Most economists use publicly held debt when assessing debt to GDP. It’s a much more common measurement when analyzing market impact of U.S. debt.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5331 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 10:49 am to
quote:

I see what you’re saying, but this isn’t some nefarious choice by the WSJ. Most economists use publicly held debt when assessing debt to GDP. It’s a much more common measurement when analyzing market impact of U.S. debt.


Economists are political animals. They use statistics however suits their purposes, as does the WSJ. The problem with publicly held debt is that the relative size of publicly held vs non-publicly held has varied significantly over time, depending mainly on relative size of the Social Security Trust fund. Therefore total (publicly held and intragovernmental) debt is the only way to get an apples to apples comparison of US federal debt over the decades, which is what that WSJ article was claiming (but failing) to do.

Using total fed debt as the metric, the US is already at an all time high debt to gdp ratio since approximately the end of 2024. Debt/GDP has been > 100% for several years. For the last decade or so, Social Security trust fund has been liquidating assets (special issue securities), which then converts intragovermental debt to publicly held Treasury debt. Unless the plan is to default on intragovernmental debt, total federal debt is the honest way to look at US federal debt load.
This post was edited on 4/30/26 at 12:51 pm
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
7031 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 10:53 am to
But let's start another war! Yeah!
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
3875 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 10:54 am to
You know those brown kids from other countries you think all look the same? We have to house and feed them while the Uniparty grifts us.

It is a great idea to cut spending. Where would you start?
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
55769 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 10:58 am to
quote:

What percentage of it is due to fraud and outright theft?


At a minimum 20-30% of US taxpayer dollars remitted to the federal government are waste, fraud and outright theft.

Think about it.

The US is nearly $40 trillion in debt and all we hear about is how social security is going to collapse in the next 5-10 years, Medicare/Medicade is underfunded, the US military now has a nearly $1 trillion budget, and on and on. With $40 trillion of US debt the US should have jewel encrusted bridges and a few roads paved with gold.
Posted by pizzathehut
west monroe
Member since Jul 2016
1377 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:02 am to
Do you want government spending to be cut? Where?


EVERYWHERE.........................
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61456 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Anyone know if 4chubby bitched about SNAP not covering sugary snacks? What about USAID cuts?



if only there was a way to find this information....

Chicken should consider implementing a "search" feature.
Posted by tigerfan84
Member since Dec 2003
26548 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:20 am to
quote:

The U.S. national debt now exceeds 100% of gross domestic product, crossing a once-unthinkable threshold, on the way toward breaking the record set in the wake of World War II.


World War Eleven?
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
19467 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:21 am to
Now that's what I call perfect leverage.
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
134939 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:22 am to
quote:

The U.S. national debt now exceeds 100% of gross domestic product
Okay, and...?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59300 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:23 am to
From 1976 through 2008, in all but one year GDP grew more than the deficit each year (total dollar amounts, not growth percentages).

From 2009 to present there have been only 5 years when the dollar amount of GDP growth has outpaced deficit spending for the same year.

In other words, this started with the GFC and government's mishandling has allowed it to continue to linger to the point where if we were to cut spending to just balance the budget (forget a surplus), the country would go into a Recession (possibly a Depression) due to any GDP growth being dependent on not just ongoing deficit spending, but the constant increase in ongoing deficit spending.
Posted by Friscodog
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2009
5071 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Do you want government spending to be cut? Where?


Typical of democrats, you won't get an answer from her. She only yells and screams and says how bad things are. None of them offer any real possible solutions or even hints of an honest dialog to resolve the issue.

It's like negotiating with Iranians in so many ways.
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
12229 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:24 am to
We are a Welfare State full of low IQ, uneducated, unskilled Illegal Immigrants. Also, there is little to no difference in spending between Trump and Biden. Obama actually spent less than Trump. Think about that for a minute.
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
26959 posts
Posted on 4/30/26 at 11:26 am to
When times were tight with the corporation for whom I worked, management seriously went through everyone's budget to see where cuts could be made. And if really bad, we had MacKenzie show up. Everybody with Assistant in their job title was sweating.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram