Started By
Message

re: The Atlantic: the great affordability crisis breaking America

Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:15 am to
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
18740 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:15 am to
The free market will force this problem to get sorted out when no one can afford to live there and companies have to relocate.

The pendulum will swing the other way.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
95613 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:16 am to
quote:

It's the market. And nothing else.


Well, you say that - and for Manhattan, it is probably true.

But not San Francisco with their ridiculous green space regulations and near prohibition of anything high density to even approach meeting housing needs.

Posted by HurricaneTiger
Coral Gables, FL
Member since Jan 2014
3207 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:17 am to
I recently set up a mortgage for a new house. 4 bedroom and 3 bath, and the 15-year mortgage is $1600 (without PMI, and I only have to pay half because I’m living with another family member). I’ve got a friend who moved to Seattle to work for FB, and his studio apartment rent costs more than my mortgage. He makes 50k more than me, but I come out about even when all expenses are taken out. Plus, I’m getting equity in a house.

Clearly, there’s a discrepancy in cost of living.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138898 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:18 am to
quote:

And what do New York, Boston, Seattle, and San Francisco have in common? Liberal hotbeds with liberal leaders and ridiculous taxes...but the author fails to address that.

The bigger problem is that there's so much red tape and political gridlock by the city and the council that it's extremely difficult to build new housing
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77250 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:20 am to
Then don’t live in those areas.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
138898 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:20 am to
quote:

But not San Francisco with their ridiculous green space regulations and near prohibition of anything high density to even approach meeting housing needs

If you want to even paint one of the historic Victorian buildings, it takes over a year just to get approval for the paint colors.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299017 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:21 am to
quote:

metro areas such as the Bay Area, Seattle, and Boston, severe supply shortages have led to soaring prices—millions of low- and middle-income families are no longer able to purchase centrally located homes.


Most zoning laws and housing regs are meant to protect property values, nor people.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:23 am to
They aren’t wrong.

There is another housing bubble.

Lenders are still packaging inflated mortgages into packages to attract investors...many of them foreign.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115324 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:26 am to
quote:

It's not just the taxes.


Agreed

quote:

Taxes are almost irrelevant in this discussion.


No, they're not.

Texas has robust property taxes, but they are "almost irrelevant" because there's no income tax AND housing is much more affordable.

They become relevant when they are part of the trifecta making housing unaffordable - as in the case with the urban centers identified in the story.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173597 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:26 am to
quote:


What does that have to do with this being a problem narrowly focused in large urban coastal metropolises, specifically in the highest priced parts of those urban areas? Are you stupid?

A lot of our citizens live in said areas?
Posted by DallasTiger11
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2004
13553 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:29 am to
This is not a free market problem and telling people to “just move” is quite ignorant.
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
20844 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:30 am to
I think a population reduction is the better route to fix this.
This post was edited on 2/10/20 at 2:05 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173597 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:31 am to
quote:

I think a population reduction is the better route to fox this.



Most people don't proudly announce their stupidity but here you are
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59205 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Move to where you can afford a house or share a house with another family.
I can’t afford a place on the beach in Malibu so I don’t live on the beach in Malibu. Crazy concept I realize.


This is why it boggles my mind that a Google, Apple, etc doesn't move to more rural areas with lower taxes. With the insane amounts of money they have they could build their own town in a damned near empty county or parish in "flyover country". Their savings on income and property taxes by locating to some place like Robertson Country, KY (much less some place with no income taxes like Wyoming) would be a boon both to the company and the local region. With today's level of accessibility via technology there's really little reason for companies like those to remain in high-population areas with sky-high costs of living.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:33 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/10/20 at 10:11 am
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28107 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Most people don't proudly announce their stupidity but here you are


Says the guy who thinks 10 cities = nation.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173597 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Texas has robust property taxes, but they are "almost irrelevant" because there's no income tax AND housing is much more affordable.

If your idea of "robust" property taxes is akin to getting flogged like a Muslim woman that didn't wear her burka I get it

I live in TX and property taxes are a huge burden depending on where you live

I pay over 6K in property taxes a year and don't exactly live in a mansion over here
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299017 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:35 am to
quote:

And nothing else.


That's dumb. Hell even The Obama administration did a study and concluded that a good par of the problem is zoning and regulation.

Things like taxes and regulation affect markets.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
97947 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:35 am to
quote:

Taxes are almost irrelevant in this discussion.



How are taxes irrelevant in this discussion

And you call other stupid
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41534 posts
Posted on 2/10/20 at 9:40 am to


Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram