0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:40 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:anyone who thinks that after reading the OP is legit retarded.
The misleading OP is going to confuse a lot of people who think this divorce occurred IN Texas
Posted on 9/27/26 at 4:52 am to NawlinsTiger9
quote:you’ve been blowing him this entire thread lmao
NawlinsTiger9
Posted on 9/27/26 at 6:47 am to icecreamsnowball
quote:
anyone who thinks that after reading the OP is legit retarded.
Plenty ITT made the mistake, including the OP
Posted on 9/27/26 at 6:48 am to LEOPOLD2
quote:
Come on man. You seem to have this habit of intentionally leaving out portions of posts and then acting like the part you quoted was the sum total of what was said.
I was trying to be nice to him to steer him correctly b/c his post seemed like he was implying "Shariah law" occurred IN the US.
The rest of his post is
quote:
or simply get the frick out.
And that's what the guy who got the divorce in Pakistan did. He "got out" and went to Pakistan for the divorce.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 6:49 am to FooManChoo
quote:
The law in Pakistan isn't exactly "secular". It's derived from Qur'anic teaching on divorce and supported by the Muslim Family Laws Ordinance of 1961, which, itself, is rooted in Islamic religious jurisprudence. It even says "Muslim" in the name.
Which specific passages in the Quran discuss waiving normal notice of legal proceedings by placing ads in newspapers ?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 8:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I was trying to be nice to him to steer him correctly b/c his post seemed like he was implying "Shariah law" occurred IN the US.
I went back and clarified and you get credit and thanks for linking TXSC's decree.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 9:15 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And that's what the guy who got the divorce in Pakistan did. He "got out" and went to Pakistan for the divorce.
I seriously can't tell if your intentionally mischaracterizing just to maintain an argument or obtuse
Posted on 9/27/26 at 5:32 pm to Trevaylin
quote:
Using SFP logic on comity, All I have to do regards getting a favorable divorce settlement is fly to Costa Rico have the right judge issue a document declaring divorce, with house, weekend property, cars, savings accounts and maybe kids[if I want them] in my favor. Back to Houston and file divorce decree and collect settlements.
I find no connection to anything SFP has ever said on this forum to substantiate your statement.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 5:42 pm to ChineseBandit58
check his post at 2:57 yesterday
Posted on 9/28/26 at 7:50 am to TrueTiger
Where did the $100 Million come from?
What it that money just stays in Texas and you both go back to your respective countries? Is it really about the marriage or the money?
What it that money just stays in Texas and you both go back to your respective countries? Is it really about the marriage or the money?
Posted on 9/28/26 at 10:00 am to SlowFlowPro
That specific act is not in the Qur'an, and it's rather deceptive of you to ask that question as if that is the relevant question to ask.
My statement was that the state law in Pakistan is "derived from Qur'anic teaching". In my statement, "derived" means originating from or developing from.
More specifically, it's Islamic jurisprudence developed from basic principles found in both the Qur'an and the Hadith, which are religious texts within Islam.
The Qur'an addresses men as the ones who divorce (2:231, 65:1), and Muslim jurists inferred from this that talaq is the husband's unilateral right, exercised like the ending of a contract and needing no court or consent.
The Pakistani law sought to add a protection for women by requiring a waiting period and a notice to the wife for the unilateral divorce, and the obscure newspaper was sufficient to meet the requirements of the law.
Whether or not there are similar laws like that elsewhere that are not based on Islamic religious teaching is irrelevant to whether or not this instance, in Pakistan, was based on Islamic religious teaching that made its way into state laws.
My statement was that the state law in Pakistan is "derived from Qur'anic teaching". In my statement, "derived" means originating from or developing from.
More specifically, it's Islamic jurisprudence developed from basic principles found in both the Qur'an and the Hadith, which are religious texts within Islam.
The Qur'an addresses men as the ones who divorce (2:231, 65:1), and Muslim jurists inferred from this that talaq is the husband's unilateral right, exercised like the ending of a contract and needing no court or consent.
The Pakistani law sought to add a protection for women by requiring a waiting period and a notice to the wife for the unilateral divorce, and the obscure newspaper was sufficient to meet the requirements of the law.
Whether or not there are similar laws like that elsewhere that are not based on Islamic religious teaching is irrelevant to whether or not this instance, in Pakistan, was based on Islamic religious teaching that made its way into state laws.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News