
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Texas Supreme Court rejects sharia divorce.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:49 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:49 pm to NawlinsTiger9
No notice?
No alimony?
No child support?
No equitable distribution?
Based
No alimony?
No child support?
No equitable distribution?
Based
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:49 pm to TrueTiger
Exactly, Talaq is a no notice divorce under Sharia law that doesnt require the woman to be present or agree. Man then performs a no notice divorce without his wife being present or being aware. SlowFlowRetard "Akschually that has nothing to do with Sharia law". Just brain dead posting.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 1:51 pm
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:50 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
The husband intentionally chose the Islamic law system because it gave him all of the advantages
It appears he chose Pakistani law because of its loose notice
quote:
Instead, Husband purported to effectuate service by publishing a notice in a small local Pakistani newspaper a mere five days in advance.
Has nothing to do with Taleq/Sharia
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:50 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Damn good thing SFP quoted the ruling before saying that then
At least you edited your arrogantly wrong take. These other clowns won’t, so you get points for that.
The irrational defense of their rage bait has always been fascinating to me
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It appears he chose Pakistani law because of its loose notice
The outcome is literally a men's rights celebration in this country's redpill community.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Has nothing to do with Taleq/Sharia
Pakistani law is not shaped or influenced by Islamic law.
Good to know.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Has nothing to do with Taleq/Sharia
You can keep making this retarded statement but if he didnt try to divorce her under Sharia law and Instead used US law, there would be no issue. Youre brain broken.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:54 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
a Houston couple who accumulated more than $100 million in community assets during their marriage.
I’m going to assume the assets they accumulated are there in Texas or somewhere within the US, not Pakistan. So it appears to me that he had no problem benefiting financially from the American system. However, when greed kicked in he tried to run home to momma as it were and the Stone Age divorce proceedings there. Good on the Texas SC for slapping this bullshite down.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:54 pm to GeorgePaton
quote:
You need go no further than that statement. Without a doubt from the Criminal Courts to the Family Courts Harris County has the most screwed up Justice System in America.
So I'm not surprised the Texas Supreme Court had to undo the absurd ruling by this lower Harris County court.
FWIW. They relied on the Supreme Court of Pakistan making the determination. It wasn't just willy nilly
quote:
After much procedural wrangling across multiple Pakistani courts, the Pakistan Supreme Court in 2018 denied relief. (The parties dispute whether this denial was procedural or substantive, a debate we need not resolve today.) The Harris County trial court relied on those Pakistani proceedings to dismiss Wife’s divorce petition for want of jurisdiction.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:54 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
Pakistani law is not shaped or influenced by Islamic law.
MASSIVE pivot
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:56 pm to Barstools
If American men could use that system to avoid the burdens we have in divorce, many of us would do it, regardless of our actual religious beliefs. I think that's the point being made.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
MASSIVE pivot
You want to change the subject to my technique instead of explaining why my statement is wrong?
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:59 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
If American men could use that system to avoid the burdens we have in divorce, many of us would do it
No argument here.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:00 pm to TrueTiger
You changed from describing shariah law to Pakistani law by pivoting to things "influenced' by shariah law, thus pivoting entirely.
You also thought the divorce was in TX initially, which I also had to correct
You also thought the divorce was in TX initially, which I also had to correct
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:05 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You also thought the divorce was in TX initially, which I also had to correct
I gave you credit for that.
But I asked Grok about the relationship of Islamic law in Pakistan law:
quote:
Pakistani divorce (and broader family) law for Muslims is heavily influenced by and grounded in Islamic law (Sharia/fiqh), though it includes statutory reforms, procedural requirements, and judicial interpretations that sometimes differ from classical positions. cdn.prod.website-files.com Pakistan is an Islamic Republic. Its Constitution requires laws to conform to the injunctions of Islam (Quran and Sunnah), and the Federal Shariat Court can review laws for consistency with those principles. The West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1962, explicitly provides that Muslim personal law (Shariat) applies to Muslims in matters including marriage, divorce, dower, and family relations (subject to any overriding statute).
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:08 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
But I asked Grok about the relationship of Islamic law in Pakistan law:
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:09 pm to TrueTiger
Houston is fricked beyond measure.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:10 pm to TrueTiger
The current law in Pakistan seems to modify the notice requirement to reject traditional taleq rules, due to harsh Pakistani punishments for bigamy
LINK
LINK
quote:
A verbal talaq is not recognised by law and the husband’s failure to send written notice to the Union Council makes the talaq ineffective. Even if the Union Council issues a certificate of talaq, if notice was not properly served on the wife, the talaq can be challenged.
This law was originally designed to protect women from a instant and unrecorded divorce. Before 1979 and the introduction of the Zina Ordinance, a woman who was not properly divorced and who later remarried could be punished for bigamy and sentenced up to 7 years (or up to 10 years if she concealed the previous marriage) and only on the complaint of her first husband. However, since 1979, bigamy makes a woman liable to charges of zina which can carry very severe penalty such as death. Therefore, it is vital for a woman to be absolutely clear about her marital status and to have documentary proof that she is properly divorced.
Notice of talaq can be served on a wife (with the Union Council’s permission) through her father, mother, adult brother or sister – but no other relatives. If this is not possible because her whereabouts are not known and notice cannot be served on her through her immediate family, the husband can still serve notice through a newspaper approved by the Union Council.
Sometimes families make the mistake of refusing to receive a registered notification, fearing that it is notice of talaq. This is dangerous because notice can then be served through a newspaper and the talaq will be effective, but the woman will be unaware of her status.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
Looks like a barely consequential modification that still leaves the core of Islamic law intact.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 2:31 pm
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:32 pm to TrueTiger
The only variable at issue is the complicated notice procedure that was added to counter traditional sharia law
*ETA: and it appears he went with the "uknown whereabouts" path that seems to be more about fraud on his part than anything else, which, again, has nothing to do with sharia law directly
*ETA: and it appears he went with the "uknown whereabouts" path that seems to be more about fraud on his part than anything else, which, again, has nothing to do with sharia law directly
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 2:33 pm

Popular
Back to top



0








