Started By
Message

re: Texas Supreme Court rejects sharia divorce.

Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:49 pm to
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
42951 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:49 pm to
No notice?

No alimony?

No child support?

No equitable distribution?

Based
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
12235 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:49 pm to
Exactly, Talaq is a no notice divorce under Sharia law that doesnt require the woman to be present or agree. Man then performs a no notice divorce without his wife being present or being aware. SlowFlowRetard "Akschually that has nothing to do with Sharia law". Just brain dead posting.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 1:51 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

The husband intentionally chose the Islamic law system because it gave him all of the advantages

It appears he chose Pakistani law because of its loose notice

quote:

Instead, Husband purported to effectuate service by publishing a notice in a small local Pakistani newspaper a mere five days in advance.


Has nothing to do with Taleq/Sharia
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

Damn good thing SFP quoted the ruling before saying that then

At least you edited your arrogantly wrong take. These other clowns won’t, so you get points for that.


The irrational defense of their rage bait has always been fascinating to me
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
42951 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:52 pm to
quote:

It appears he chose Pakistani law because of its loose notice

The outcome is literally a men's rights celebration in this country's redpill community.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
84218 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

Has nothing to do with Taleq/Sharia


Pakistani law is not shaped or influenced by Islamic law.

Good to know.
Posted by Barstools
Atlanta
Member since Jan 2016
12235 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:53 pm to
quote:


Has nothing to do with Taleq/Sharia


You can keep making this retarded statement but if he didnt try to divorce her under Sharia law and Instead used US law, there would be no issue. Youre brain broken.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
21721 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

a Houston couple who accumulated more than $100 million in community assets during their marriage.


I’m going to assume the assets they accumulated are there in Texas or somewhere within the US, not Pakistan. So it appears to me that he had no problem benefiting financially from the American system. However, when greed kicked in he tried to run home to momma as it were and the Stone Age divorce proceedings there. Good on the Texas SC for slapping this bullshite down.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

You need go no further than that statement. Without a doubt from the Criminal Courts to the Family Courts Harris County has the most screwed up Justice System in America.

So I'm not surprised the Texas Supreme Court had to undo the absurd ruling by this lower Harris County court.


FWIW. They relied on the Supreme Court of Pakistan making the determination. It wasn't just willy nilly

quote:

After much procedural wrangling across multiple Pakistani courts, the Pakistan Supreme Court in 2018 denied relief. (The parties dispute whether this denial was procedural or substantive, a debate we need not resolve today.) The Harris County trial court relied on those Pakistani proceedings to dismiss Wife’s divorce petition for want of jurisdiction.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

Pakistani law is not shaped or influenced by Islamic law.

MASSIVE pivot
Posted by SCLibertarian
Conway, South Carolina
Member since Aug 2013
42951 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:56 pm to
If American men could use that system to avoid the burdens we have in divorce, many of us would do it, regardless of our actual religious beliefs. I think that's the point being made.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
84218 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

MASSIVE pivot


You want to change the subject to my technique instead of explaining why my statement is wrong?
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
84218 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 1:59 pm to
quote:


If American men could use that system to avoid the burdens we have in divorce, many of us would do it


No argument here.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:00 pm to
You changed from describing shariah law to Pakistani law by pivoting to things "influenced' by shariah law, thus pivoting entirely.

You also thought the divorce was in TX initially, which I also had to correct
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
84218 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

You also thought the divorce was in TX initially, which I also had to correct


I gave you credit for that.


But I asked Grok about the relationship of Islamic law in Pakistan law:

quote:

Pakistani divorce (and broader family) law for Muslims is heavily influenced by and grounded in Islamic law (Sharia/fiqh), though it includes statutory reforms, procedural requirements, and judicial interpretations that sometimes differ from classical positions. cdn.prod.website-files.com Pakistan is an Islamic Republic. Its Constitution requires laws to conform to the injunctions of Islam (Quran and Sunnah), and the Federal Shariat Court can review laws for consistency with those principles. The West Pakistan Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1962, explicitly provides that Muslim personal law (Shariat) applies to Muslims in matters including marriage, divorce, dower, and family relations (subject to any overriding statute).
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
40731 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

But I asked Grok about the relationship of Islamic law in Pakistan law:




Posted by IamNotaRobot
OKC
Member since Nov 2021
2147 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:09 pm to
Houston is fricked beyond measure.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:10 pm to
The current law in Pakistan seems to modify the notice requirement to reject traditional taleq rules, due to harsh Pakistani punishments for bigamy

LINK

quote:

A verbal talaq is not recognised by law and the husband’s failure to send written notice to the Union Council makes the talaq ineffective. Even if the Union Council issues a certificate of talaq, if notice was not properly served on the wife, the talaq can be challenged.

This law was originally designed to protect women from a instant and unrecorded divorce. Before 1979 and the introduction of the Zina Ordinance, a woman who was not properly divorced and who later remarried could be punished for bigamy and sentenced up to 7 years (or up to 10 years if she concealed the previous marriage) and only on the complaint of her first husband. However, since 1979, bigamy makes a woman liable to charges of zina which can carry very severe penalty such as death. Therefore, it is vital for a woman to be absolutely clear about her marital status and to have documentary proof that she is properly divorced.

Notice of talaq can be served on a wife (with the Union Council’s permission) through her father, mother, adult brother or sister – but no other relatives. If this is not possible because her whereabouts are not known and notice cannot be served on her through her immediate family, the husband can still serve notice through a newspaper approved by the Union Council.

Sometimes families make the mistake of refusing to receive a registered notification, fearing that it is notice of talaq. This is dangerous because notice can then be served through a newspaper and the talaq will be effective, but the woman will be unaware of her status.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
84218 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:30 pm to
Looks like a barely consequential modification that still leaves the core of Islamic law intact.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 2:31 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:32 pm to
The only variable at issue is the complicated notice procedure that was added to counter traditional sharia law

*ETA: and it appears he went with the "uknown whereabouts" path that seems to be more about fraud on his part than anything else, which, again, has nothing to do with sharia law directly
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 2:33 pm
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram