Started By
Message

re: Texas Supreme Court rejects sharia divorce.

Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:32 pm to
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
84218 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:32 pm to
I thought you would appreciate my honesty in naming the source instead of plagiarism.


Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
68845 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:36 pm to
quote:

Has nothing to do with "Sharia law"


You find new ways to make yourself look like an idiot every day.
Posted by TenWheelsForJesus
Member since Jan 2018
12041 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

The court did not rule the divorce invalid because it used Taleq


You're just splitting hairs to be a contrarian. It ruled the procedures used under sharia law conflict with the procedures under US law. Your spin doesn't change that basic fact.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

You're just splitting hairs to be a contrarian. I

No. Precision is important

The OP confused many by its poor wording.

quote:

It ruled the procedures used under sharia law


-sharia law
+Pakistani law
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
40731 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:41 pm to
You asking grok is not what I found funny
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 2:42 pm
Posted by IndianPower
Louisiana
Member since May 2021
2438 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:41 pm to
You are not real sharp LOL
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

You are not real sharp LOL



Always funny
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
84218 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

-sharia law
+Pakistani law



A distinction without a difference.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:45 pm to
But that's simply not true, as I've shown with literal references to a Pakistani law firm
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
84218 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:50 pm to
And I said that their law is deeply rooted in Islamic law, even if it has a few tweaks.
Posted by MrFreakinMiyagi
Reseda
Member since Feb 2007
20275 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:50 pm to
What a retard
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
144897 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

Has nothing to do with "Sharia law"


Sharia law states a man can divorce his wife without her agreement or knowledge.

Our laws do not unless abandonment and only then after exhausting all reasonable attempts to contact other party.

They should have taught you this.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
40731 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:53 pm to
How are yall still not understanding what he’s saying
Posted by GeorgePaton
God's Country
Member since May 2017
6085 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

They relied on the Supreme Court of Pakistan making the determination. It wasn't just willy nilly


So you're one of them Ruth Bader Ginsburg disciples, eh? She was the ultimate Globalist SCOTUS Judge who believed that deliberations and rulings of foreign courts should be considered in deliberations in this country.

So explain to me, why should our Justice System consider the deliberation and rulings of a Supreme Court............in an Islamic country?

*[rimshot]*
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

And I said that their law is deeply rooted in Islamic law,

And the notice requirement was added specifically to reject lots of that influence, to protect women from other secular Pakistani law
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

Sharia law states a man can divorce his wife without her agreement or knowledge

Pakistani law rejects this
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
144897 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

SlowFlowPro


i commented before catching up on thread and realizing you moved the goal posts.

As an Islamic Republic, can Pakistani law go against anything in the quran?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

So explain to me, why should our Justice System consider the deliberation and rulings of a Supreme Court............in an Islamic country?

You realize the Texas Supreme Court and US law, generally doesn't outright reject rulings in foreign courts, right?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

realizing you moved the goal posts.

Posted by Stat M Repairman
Member since Jun 2023
3667 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

a Houston couple who accumulated more than $100 million in community assets during their marriage.


And now that paki woman gonna find a way to give some of the money to the marxists to further endhitification of America.

She's lived the American dream, no doubt, which is marry a rich mf then get divorced.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 3:01 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram