
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Texas Supreme Court rejects sharia divorce.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:32 pm to NawlinsTiger9
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:32 pm to NawlinsTiger9
I thought you would appreciate my honesty in naming the source instead of plagiarism.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Has nothing to do with "Sharia law"
You find new ways to make yourself look like an idiot every day.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The court did not rule the divorce invalid because it used Taleq
You're just splitting hairs to be a contrarian. It ruled the procedures used under sharia law conflict with the procedures under US law. Your spin doesn't change that basic fact.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:39 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
You're just splitting hairs to be a contrarian. I
No. Precision is important
The OP confused many by its poor wording.
quote:
It ruled the procedures used under sharia law
-sharia law
+Pakistani law
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:41 pm to TrueTiger
You asking grok is not what I found funny
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 2:42 pm
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
You are not real sharp LOL
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:42 pm to IndianPower
quote:
You are not real sharp LOL
Always funny
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
-sharia law
+Pakistani law
A distinction without a difference.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:45 pm to TrueTiger
But that's simply not true, as I've shown with literal references to a Pakistani law firm 
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
And I said that their law is deeply rooted in Islamic law, even if it has a few tweaks.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:52 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Has nothing to do with "Sharia law"
Sharia law states a man can divorce his wife without her agreement or knowledge.
Our laws do not unless abandonment and only then after exhausting all reasonable attempts to contact other party.
They should have taught you this.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:53 pm to Rebel
How are yall still not understanding what he’s saying
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
They relied on the Supreme Court of Pakistan making the determination. It wasn't just willy nilly
So you're one of them Ruth Bader Ginsburg disciples, eh? She was the ultimate Globalist SCOTUS Judge who believed that deliberations and rulings of foreign courts should be considered in deliberations in this country.
So explain to me, why should our Justice System consider the deliberation and rulings of a Supreme Court............in an Islamic country?
*[rimshot]*
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:55 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
And I said that their law is deeply rooted in Islamic law,
And the notice requirement was added specifically to reject lots of that influence, to protect women from other secular Pakistani law
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:55 pm to Rebel
quote:
Sharia law states a man can divorce his wife without her agreement or knowledge
Pakistani law rejects this
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:56 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SlowFlowPro
i commented before catching up on thread and realizing you moved the goal posts.
As an Islamic Republic, can Pakistani law go against anything in the quran?
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:57 pm to GeorgePaton
quote:
So explain to me, why should our Justice System consider the deliberation and rulings of a Supreme Court............in an Islamic country?
You realize the Texas Supreme Court and US law, generally doesn't outright reject rulings in foreign courts, right?
Posted on 9/26/26 at 2:57 pm to Rebel
quote:
realizing you moved the goal posts.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:00 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
a Houston couple who accumulated more than $100 million in community assets during their marriage.
And now that paki woman gonna find a way to give some of the money to the marxists to further endhitification of America.
She's lived the American dream, no doubt, which is marry a rich mf then get divorced.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 3:01 pm

Popular
Back to top



1










