
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Texas Supreme Court rejects sharia divorce.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:00 pm to Rebel
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:00 pm to Rebel
quote:
i commented before catching up on thread and realizing you moved the goal posts.
His first reply to the OP was sufficient to see the point
If anything, the OP has wildly shifted the goal posts. He didn’t even know what country the divorce was taking place in when he started the thread.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 3:01 pm
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:00 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
How are yall still not understanding what he’s saying
i understand fully what he is saying. why don't you understand the script he is running?
He made a silly statement early in the thread because of the tism that makes him want to argue with a brick law.
He must've caught his mistake, shifted the goal posts, and is now using the "Ackchyually" script.
Go back to transing your kids or whatever it is you people do.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:01 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
If anything, the OP has wildly shifted the goal posts. He didn’t even know what country the divorce was taking place in when he started the thread.
And he still hasn't edited his OP to clarify that
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And the notice requirement was added specifically to reject lots of that influence,
And but for an American court stepping it, it wouldn’t have mattered.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:01 pm to Rebel
quote:
He made a silly statement early in the thread because of the tism that makes him want to argue with a brick law. He must've caught his mistake, shifted the goal posts, and is now using the "Ackchyually" script
That is the complete opposite of what is happening
Are you pregaming too hard and too early or something?
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:02 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
And but for an American court stepping it, it wouldn’t have mattered.
Which also has nothing to do with Sharia law
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:02 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
Are you pregaming too hard and too early or something?
Hopefully UF going up 7-0 on Ole Miss gets his head straight
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
I didn't know that. But you still have not answered my question. Why should a court in this country consider a ruling from a Supreme Court in Pakistan - a Justice System governed by Sharia Law?
But I'm curious? Are you muslim? If not are you democrat, independent.....Republican? Please be honest.
But I'm curious? Are you muslim? If not are you democrat, independent.....Republican? Please be honest.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:39 pm to GeorgePaton
quote:
Why should a court in this country consider a ruling from a Supreme Court in Pakistan - a Justice System governed by Sharia Law?
The TXSC did not reject the divorce in Pakistan because of it being done in sharia law, and had he given her proper notice, I imagine they would have accepted the divorce in TX.
quote:
But I'm curious? Are you muslim? If not are you democrat, independent?
Not that it matters, but No, no, and no.
I'm a person who hates rage bait and tries to warn people about it before they make themselves look silly.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 3:40 pm
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:45 pm to GeorgePaton
quote:
Why should a court in this country consider a ruling from a Supreme Court in Pakistan
quote:
Why should a court in this country consider a ruling from a Supreme Court in Pakistan
An American court stepped in and enforced the tiny secular part of Pakistan law that the Pakistan courts ignored,
BECAUSE THE PAKISTAN COURTS STUCK WITH SHARIA LAW.
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:46 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
An American court stepped in and enforced the tiny secular part of Pakistan law that the Pakistan courts ignored,
BECAUSE THE PAKISTAN COURTS STUCK WITH SHARIA LAW.
I've litigated judgments being invalidated for similar notice reasons. In America. Nothing to do with sharia law.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 3:47 pm

Popular
Back to top


1










