Started By
Message

re: Texas Supreme Court rejects sharia divorce.

Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:00 pm to
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
40731 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

i commented before catching up on thread and realizing you moved the goal posts.


His first reply to the OP was sufficient to see the point

If anything, the OP has wildly shifted the goal posts. He didn’t even know what country the divorce was taking place in when he started the thread.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 3:01 pm
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
144897 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:00 pm to
quote:

How are yall still not understanding what he’s saying


i understand fully what he is saying. why don't you understand the script he is running?

He made a silly statement early in the thread because of the tism that makes him want to argue with a brick law.

He must've caught his mistake, shifted the goal posts, and is now using the "Ackchyually" script.

Go back to transing your kids or whatever it is you people do.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

If anything, the OP has wildly shifted the goal posts. He didn’t even know what country the divorce was taking place in when he started the thread.


And he still hasn't edited his OP to clarify that
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
84218 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:01 pm to
quote:


And the notice requirement was added specifically to reject lots of that influence,


And but for an American court stepping it, it wouldn’t have mattered.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
40731 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:01 pm to
quote:

He made a silly statement early in the thread because of the tism that makes him want to argue with a brick law. He must've caught his mistake, shifted the goal posts, and is now using the "Ackchyually" script


That is the complete opposite of what is happening

Are you pregaming too hard and too early or something?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

And but for an American court stepping it, it wouldn’t have mattered.

Which also has nothing to do with Sharia law
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Are you pregaming too hard and too early or something?

Hopefully UF going up 7-0 on Ole Miss gets his head straight
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
84218 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:03 pm to
Go Gators.
Posted by GeorgePaton
God's Country
Member since May 2017
6085 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:38 pm to
I didn't know that. But you still have not answered my question. Why should a court in this country consider a ruling from a Supreme Court in Pakistan - a Justice System governed by Sharia Law?

But I'm curious? Are you muslim? If not are you democrat, independent.....Republican? Please be honest.

This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 3:40 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Why should a court in this country consider a ruling from a Supreme Court in Pakistan - a Justice System governed by Sharia Law?


The TXSC did not reject the divorce in Pakistan because of it being done in sharia law, and had he given her proper notice, I imagine they would have accepted the divorce in TX.

quote:

But I'm curious? Are you muslim? If not are you democrat, independent?

Not that it matters, but No, no, and no.

I'm a person who hates rage bait and tries to warn people about it before they make themselves look silly.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 3:40 pm
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
84218 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

Why should a court in this country consider a ruling from a Supreme Court in Pakistan
quote:

Why should a court in this country consider a ruling from a Supreme Court in Pakistan


An American court stepped in and enforced the tiny secular part of Pakistan law that the Pakistan courts ignored,

BECAUSE THE PAKISTAN COURTS STUCK WITH SHARIA LAW.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
483619 posts
Posted on 9/26/26 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

An American court stepped in and enforced the tiny secular part of Pakistan law that the Pakistan courts ignored,

BECAUSE THE PAKISTAN COURTS STUCK WITH SHARIA LAW.

I've litigated judgments being invalidated for similar notice reasons. In America. Nothing to do with sharia law.
This post was edited on 9/26/26 at 3:47 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram