- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sweeping bill to overhaul Supreme Court would add six justices
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:40 am to 4cubbies
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:40 am to 4cubbies
And... there we have it...
Starts topic (that had already been started)...
Gets asked why...
Gets called out for being disingenuous...
Plays the "I'm an innocent victim, why are y'all being so mean to me" card...
Starts topic (that had already been started)...
Gets asked why...
Gets called out for being disingenuous...
Plays the "I'm an innocent victim, why are y'all being so mean to me" card...
This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 9:42 am
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:42 am to 4cubbies
Adding justices to SCOTUS? Absolutely not.
Adding more district and circuit courts? Yes
Adding a mandatory retirement age for all federal judges? Yes, but only via a constitutional amendment.
Adding more district and circuit courts? Yes
Adding a mandatory retirement age for all federal judges? Yes, but only via a constitutional amendment.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:43 am to upgrayedd
quote:
When you’re getting beat, just change the rules because you’re too much of a pussy to put in the effort to win
What am I getting beat at? Who is beating me?
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:44 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Who is beating me?
Probably your boyfriend
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:44 am to 4cubbies
quote:
i don't know. I haven't really thought about it .I honestly don't think much about federal politics. Sorry? I'm a communist because I don't ponder over the Supreme Court?You can waste all the time you want fretting over things you have absolutely no control over, but that's not how I want to spend my time.
And THAT is how great civilizations fail. People like you " haven't thought about it" and your core values can basically be defined as "I'm a good and caring person, what do the other good and caring people think". Totally unaware that it is PRECISELY that feminine propensity to simultaneously be low-information AND governed by whatever your emotions are on any given day that has brought this culture to its knees. You, and your fellow White Lady Culture Ragers, would basically govern according to whatever your emotions are, about any random issue, on any random day. And you all are SO EASY to manipulate. Seriously, one daytime tv lady who you admire could and would absolutely sway your opinion on virtually everything.
Pro tip: tinkering with every American Institution for partisan power and control is absolute madness. Nine justices is perfect. It works. It's competent. It serves the intention of the Founders and has led to tremendous stability in the Rule of Law.
You lazy emotional "any idea is a good idea as long as it makes me feel warm and fuzzie for 15 minutes" lefties need to grow the frick up before there is nothing left of America to preserve. You all need to educate yourself in a non-ideological Constitutional manner and slow your roll until you achieve basic literacy on American history. Quit fricking TINKERING with everything and start PROTECTING our Institutions.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:45 am to Lsupimp
quote:
And THAT is how great civilizations fail. People like you " haven't thought about it"
What are you doing to change the Supreme Court? Maybe I can follow your example.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:46 am to MemphisGuy
quote:
And... there we have it...

Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:47 am to 4cubbies
Sore losers. If the Democrats held a majority and Roe versus Wade was not reversed, this would never be raised as an issue.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 9:49 am to 4cubbies
quote:
remake the Supreme Court following controversies over rulings and ethics.
lol
quote:
the goal of the bill is to restore public confidence in a battered institution.
lol
quote:
require a ruling by two-thirds of the high court and the circuit courts of appeals, rather than a simple majority, to overturn a law passed by Congress. Wyden said the current court has been too quick to discard precedent and curtail rights by narrow majorities.
lol
What a horrible bill.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:00 am to 4cubbies
quote:
The legislation by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.)
LMFAO.
These demonic and anti-American filth are always looking to usurp any principals established in our republic.
frick them and frick all you soy boy - low -T gimps that exist these days.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:04 am to Lizardman2
quote:
These demonic and anti-American filth are always looking to usurp any principals established in our republic.
>I can't believe this mummy weilds power. I mean, I can, but he shouldn't. He's 75 years old. If you are older than the Social Security retirement age, you should not be allowed to hold public office.
This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 10:05 am
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:07 am to MemphisGuy
quote:
Plays the "I'm an innocent victim, why are y'all being so mean to me" card...
Every single thread.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:07 am to 4cubbies
If he isn’t the worst Senator, he is right up there with Harris on the stupidity chart
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:08 am to 4cubbies
I am doing NOTHING to "change" it. It is not in need of change, restructuring or repair. It is functioning EXACTLY as it was meant to, whether I personally agree or disagree with specific rulings. I am conserving American traditions, principles, ideals and Institutions by arguing persuasively in favor of preserving them, electing politicians who understand this (Constitutionalists instead of emotion-driven Marxist radicals) and not confusing my emotions and moods with wisdom.

Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:09 am to 4cubbies
quote:
I haven't really thought about it.
Yet you have an article about it you wanted to share
Why do you people dance around direct questions?
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:10 am to 4cubbies
quote:Only a defeated imbecile thinks this way about his police state.
You can waste all the time you want fretting over things you have absolutely no control over, but that's not how I want to spend my time.
You don't deserve to have an equal vote as those who aren't giant pussies.
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:12 am to Jrv2damac
quote:
Yet you have an article about it you wanted to share
Yes. Is there an unwritten rule that in order to post an article, the OP must have a definitive position on whether or not they support or oppose what is suggested in the article?
quote:
Why do you people dance around direct questions?
I answered the queston honestly. You just don't like my answer.
Popular
Back to top



2







