Started By
Message

re: Sweeping bill to overhaul Supreme Court would add six justices

Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:13 am to
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61407 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:13 am to
quote:


I am doing NOTHING to "change" it. It is not in need of change, restructuring or repair.
\
So why are you mad at me for not devoting thought to a system that you believe doesn't need to be changed? What exactly amd I supposed to be thinking about?

This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 10:14 am
Posted by Park duck
Sip
Member since Oct 2018
627 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:16 am to
quote:

o why are you mad at me for not devoting thought to a system that you believe doesn't need to be changed? What exactly amd I supposed to be thinking about?

Why does it need to be changed?
Posted by LaMigra
Member since Nov 2022
2773 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:19 am to
“Sweeping”????

Lololololol

D.O.A.
Posted by Lsupimp
Ersatz Amerika-97.6% phony & fake
Member since Nov 2003
86171 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:19 am to
Because you are completely susceptible to championing very bad ideas on issues you don’t even comprehend. As anyone who has read your low -information drivel over the years knows. You are essentially a good person who wants to govern according to however your “ goodness factor “ emotionally affects you. Being Ruled by your passions is folly.

Look, dear, it is what it is. People like you who float bad idea after bad idea really have no idea of how much damage you are doing to our broader culture.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61407 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:19 am to
quote:

Why does it need to be changed?



I didn't suggest it needed to be changed.

Pimp accused me of:

quote:

Totally unaware that it is PRECISELY that feminine propensity to simultaneously be low-information AND governed by whatever your emotions are on any given day that has brought this culture to its knees. You, and your fellow White Lady Culture Ragers, would basically govern according to whatever your emotions are, about any random issue, on any random day. And you all are SO EASY to manipulate. Seriously, one daytime tv lady who you admire could and would absolutely sway your opinion on virtually everything.


because I said I don't devote thought to the Supreme Court.

So I'm asking what I'm supposed to be thinking about.
Posted by prouddawg
Member since Sep 2024
9173 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:19 am to
quote:

I wonder how they are going to cheat this through.


Exec order ??
Posted by Jack Carter
Member since Sep 2018
12200 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:20 am to
OK let's agree to pass it only under a Trump administration. Watch them suddenly call court packing a threat to democracy
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:20 am to
quote:


Exec order ??


Wouldn't this require a constitutional amendment?
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
37328 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:24 am to
15 judges hearing a case is too many cooks in the kitchen.
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
39931 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Sweeping bill to overhaul Supreme Court would add six justices

FDR says hold my beer
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
18749 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:24 am to
GOP should say, if you add 6, we’ll just add 12 next cycle.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
61407 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:24 am to
quote:

Because you are completely susceptible to championing very bad ideas on issues you don’t even comprehend.
EVERYONE is susceptible to championing bad ideas.

I choose to focus on my locus of control. The Supreme Court falls well outside of that.

quote:

As anyone who has read your low -information drivel over the years knows. You are essentially a good person who wants to govern according to however your “ goodness factor “ emotionally affects you. Being Ruled by your passions is folly.


Wrong. I don't want to be governed at all. I generally don't support ANY legislation. I don't support ANY politicians. I used to care about the Supreme Court and found their rulings interesting, but I think it's all a bunch of bullshite now.

quote:

Look, dear, it is what it is. People like you who float bad idea after bad idea really have no idea of how much damage you are doing to our broader culture


What bad ideas have I floated? I posted this article because I was curious about what people would say about adding more justices to the court. Truly, I doubt my life would change if 100 justices were added or 5 were taken away.
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
4783 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:25 am to
quote:

I wonder how they are going to cheat this through


They will take the wording, and hide it into another bill. One that they know they can get passed.

Omnibus was so freaking huge that they hid all kinds of stuff in there. They'll do it like that, or something that they know pubs will cave in on, to avoid shutting down govt.
This post was edited on 9/27/24 at 10:26 am
Posted by MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
Member since Nov 2023
14675 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:26 am to
quote:

because I said I don't devote thought to the Supreme Court.



This is clearly untrue. Otherwise, you wouldn't have started a new topic about this very thing.

It would be like me starting a topic on abortion, and then claiming that I don't devote thought to abortion. That would be just silly, just as your premise that you don't devote thought to the Supreme Court... after starting a new thread about said Supreme Court.. is just silly. I have no doubt that you will continue to double down on your silliness, though, and continue to attack people who call you out on it... and have no doubt that you'll say you didn't attack anyone.
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
10870 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:27 am to
quote:

I honestly don't think much about federal politics. Sorry?


Maybe you should keep your trap shut then and let the adults talk
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28157 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:28 am to
quote:

So I'm asking what I'm supposed to be thinking about.


I don't know what you're capable of thinking about. If this topic is any indication, not much.

You should definitely start more topics on issues that you're NOT thinking about. That makes total sense.
Posted by BhamTigah
Lurker since Jan 2003
Member since Jan 2007
17614 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:28 am to
That's what we need, more lifetimers on the payroll.
Posted by Wolfwireless
Member since Aug 2024
4783 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Who de gonna git 2 vote 4 dat?

Let's wait and see how many RINOs get elected, and how many get booted, in November.
All they gotta do is resubmit the bill in the new year.
Posted by scottydoesntknow
Member since Nov 2023
10870 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:29 am to
quote:

quote:Who is beating me? Probably your boyfriend


lol most women could kick the arse of her limp wristed husband
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
33662 posts
Posted on 9/27/24 at 10:29 am to
Republicans should float a bill to add 1000 judges to the Supreme Court. Just go ahead and get to the end result of this stupidity.
Jump to page
Page First 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram