Started By
Message

re: Swedish study shows Vaccine Spike Protein Enters Nucleus

Posted on 11/21/21 at 9:51 am to
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
79902 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 9:51 am to
quote:

Its called making up bullshite
OK sure. My points have been that the mRNA vax does not alter one's DNA. That there are not huge numbers of people dying from the vaccine. That mandates and coercion to get the vaccine are absolutely despicable.
Posted by GeauxFightingTigers1
Member since Oct 2016
12574 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 9:56 am to
quote:

OK sure. My points have been that the mRNA vax does not alter one's DNA. That there are not huge numbers of people dying from the vaccine. That mandates and coercion to get the vaccine are absolutely despicable.


You have been promoting this bullshite from the beginning. You can't un-take the jab. There is absolutely nothing "scientific" about any of this, unless "science" is a religion... which it is at this point.

You pointing out whether someone has a degree is kind the problem, all one needed to see how fubar this is and has been... is probably a High School science class and maybe an ounce of common sense.

There is a reason why there things called processes, control groups, and testing.

Its called making up bullshite.
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 9:58 am
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45536 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 10:00 am to
quote:

These people kill me. Want to know if I've read the paper.


Well did you? I did read it. It's linked under the video and it only takes about 10 minutes to read it. It clearly says that there has been no evidence that shows that the spike proteins enter the bone marrow and effect reproduction of either B or T cells. Which means it would only affect the circulating B and T cells which have lifespans of 6 weeks and 6 months. It also says that their findings have not been collaborated by other research yet. It also does not differentiate between spike proteins from the actual virus and spike proteins from the vaccine. Since the spike protein load from infection with the actual virus is greater than the spike protein load of the vaccines. Again this research has not been collaborated with other in lab research and it definitely has not been collaborated in person research. In fact the in person research contradicts this in lab research. In person research shows that vaccinated individuals mount an stronger immune response to covid infection than immunologically naive (neither vaccinated or previously infected) individuals. How could people exposed to the spike protein through the vaccine mount a stronger response if the spike protein has altered their immune cell's DNA to the point where it did not work?

quote:

What, not published? Fact checkers.


Actual I am published. I have been published in multiple medical journals.
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 10:03 am
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
8409 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 10:03 am to
quote:

I don't know what he knows or doesn't


Sorry to derail but his take was against all anti vax without reason

We all would love to get any actual info on that subject but I doubt our government will help

Logic tells me that doctoring with our bodies dna is not good
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
8409 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 10:11 am to
quote:

Actual I am published.


Would love to read them. Links?

Thanks
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
24857 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 10:15 am to
quote:

control groups


Speaking of which….

A grim warning from Israel: Vaccination blunts, but does not defeat Delta….

With early vaccination and outstanding data, country is the world’s real-life COVID-19 lab.


“Now is a critical time,” Israeli Minister of Health Nitzan Horowitz said as the 56-year-old got a COVID-19 booster shot on 13 August, the day his country became the first nation to offer a third dose of vaccine to people as young as age 50. “We’re in a race against the pandemic.”

His message was meant for his fellow Israelis, but it is a warning to the world. Israel has among the world’s highest levels of vaccination for COVID-19, with 78% of those 12 and older fully vaccinated, the vast majority with the Pfizer vaccine. Yet the country is now logging one of the world’s highest infection rates, with nearly 650 new cases daily per million people. More than half are in fully vaccinated people, underscoring the extraordinary transmissibility of the Delta variant and stoking concerns that the benefits of vaccination ebb over time.

The sheer number of vaccinated Israelis means some breakthrough infections were inevitable, and the unvaccinated are still far more likely to end up in the hospital or die. But Israel’s experience is forcing the booster issue onto the radar for other nations, suggesting as it does that even the best vaccinated countries will face a Delta surge.

“This is a very clear warning sign for the rest of world,” says Ran Balicer, chief innovation officer at Clalit Health Services (CHS), Israel’s largest health maintenance organization (HMO). “If it can happen here, it can probably happen everywhere.”

Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45536 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 10:24 am to
quote:

You pointing out whether someone has a degree is kind the problem, all one needed to see how fubar this is and has been... is probably a High School science class and maybe an ounce of common sense.


Unless high school science class has changed a lot from the early 2000s I highly doubt that anyone with just a high school science class's worth of knowledge and an ounce of common sense can understand the complexities of the research presented. VDJ recombination was not in my high school science class curriculum or any of the science classes I took in undergrad. The earliest I remember hearing about VDJ recombination was in graduate school and then again in medical school. Did your high school science classes cover VDJ recombination?

quote:

There is a reason why there things called processes, control groups, and testing.



Oh you mean like ...

quote:

Between July 27, 2020, and November 14, 2020, a total of 44,820 persons were screened, and 43,548 persons 16 years of age or older underwent randomization at 152 sites worldwide
LINK

That is just one example of the research and testing that was done for the vaccine. All you people claiming for 3 to 5 years worth of data would just cry for 10 to 20 years worth of data if you were presented with 3 to 5 years worth of data.

quote:

Its called making up bullshite.


No sir. What you are doing is called making up bullshite.
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 10:31 am
Posted by Strannix
C.S.A.
Member since Dec 2012
53704 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 10:27 am to
We can see the data in 55 years
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45536 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Actual I am published.


Would love to read them. Links?



Not posting the links because that would link my TD handle to my actual name and that will end up badly.
Posted by David_DJS
Member since Aug 2005
22695 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 10:38 am to
quote:

while im not crazy4lsu it doesnt make any sense whatsoever that vaccines would be prolonging the pandemic. if the vaccines work then it reduces the potential reservoir and would shorten the course of the pandemic. If they dont work then there is no difference.

What are the infection/reinfection rates broken down by symptomatic and asymptomatic for:

1. Vaccinated with no prior natural immunity
2. Vaccinated with prior natural immunity
3. Natural immunity

If you can’t give us these based in real data, then I don’t know how you can know that the vaccines aren’t prolonging the “pandemic” unless your argument is there is zero difference between vaccine immunity and natural immunity, which I don’t think anyone other than Fauci is making.

Because this information has not been developed (I’ll be pleasantly shocked if you can answer my questions), people go by anecdotal info and intuition. For some that results in extreme views (that you/others lampoon), but there are orders of magnitude more people like me that are simply skeptical of everything the “experts” have proclaimed about the virus/vaccines because nearly none of prior proclamations have proven accurate, and this whole shitshow is clearly political AF and a money/power grab of extreme order. Many of us have scientific or engineering backgrounds, so while not MDs or virologists, we can read what is written and get a sense/gist of what seems plausible and what doesn’t.

Anecdotally, it sure seems vaccinated people are getting infected and reinfected at rates higher than those with natural immunity. If this is true, and I’d love to see scientific evidence it’s not, but if it is - it seems to me an argument that the vaccines are prolonging the “pandemic” is reasonable.
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 10:42 am
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89701 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Gender spectrum evangelists and antivax worshippers generally have the same level of scientific understanding


What’s the science of being able to enter a sports stadium with one shot but you aren’t considered vaccinated until 2 weeks after your second?

You nazis can’t even answer simple questions on why the measures we are taking makes sense.

Like vaccinating 5 year olds.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103904 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 10:51 am to
So, apparently I now have my retirement fund through being able to provide sperm undamaged by this process.
Posted by zatetic
Member since Nov 2015
5677 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Swedish study shows Vaccine Spike Protein Enters Nucleus



It has already been admitted that it isn't a vaccine it is gene therapy by the president of Bayer.
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38336 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 12:07 pm to
quote:

Logic tells me that doctoring with our bodies dna is not good

Well, I would agree so if RiverCity wants to get into the discussion that would be appreciated. I really don't care to listen to some guy walking down the street breathing heavily while trying to explain game changing information. I have had the vaccine. I am 9 months out now from my second so this is important. Maybe RiverCity will re-engage. Be helpful!
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
39817 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Well, you had said that letting virus run its course also carries with it the gigantic risk of mutation so doesn't the link showed that mass vaccination does as well?



But where mutations occur is meaningful. The danger of letting the virus run its course is subclinical infection in a subset of the population that may be isolated from other populations for a period of time, which might drive viral recombination events.

Geert's theory doesn't seem to be bearing out, as the Delts variant, which is incredibly infectious, is pre-vaccine and involves only a few mutations at the spike protein. Otherwise tying vaccination to the most pathogenic portion of the virus is the most sound molecular strategy. I don't think any of the variants of concern are from the post-vaccination era, as they all seem to have started in December of 2020. So far, Geert doesn't seem to be correct.

This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 12:28 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138725 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

I really don't care to listen to some guy walking down the street breathing heavily while trying to explain game changing information.
Here is the intro and concluding discussion of the study he's referencing
quote:





LINK
This post was edited on 11/21/21 at 12:26 pm
Posted by idsrdum
Member since Jan 2017
624 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

But where mutations occur is meaningful. The danger of letting the virus run its course is subclinical infection in a subset of the population that may be isolated from other populations for a period of time, which might drive viral recombination events.


Are you implying that subclinical infection does not occur among the vaccinated?

quote:

Geert's theory doesn't seem to be bearing out, as the Delts variant, which is incredibly infectious, is pre-vaccine and involves only a few mutations at the spike protein.

Vaccines are not the only way for the virus to placed under immune pressure - lockdowns are another example.

Here is a paper that concludes 'significant frequencies':
quote:

Spike amino acid substitutions and deletions that impact neutralizing antibodies are present at significant frequencies in the global virus population, and there is emerging evidence of variants exhibiting resistance to antibody-mediated immunity elicited by vaccines.

LINK
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6537 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

As increasing vaccination rates will result in a gradually expanding reservoir of asymptomatic viral spreaders, the benefit of reduced disease and hence, reduced viral shedding in vaccinated elderly (or otherwise vulnerable subjects) will be countered by enhanced spread and breeding of more infectious variants in the less vulnerable part of the population. The higher the vaccination rate, the more the latter effect will outweigh the benefit of vaccine-mediated reduction of immune pressure exerted by the vulnerable part of the population. Concomitant implementation of stringent infection prevention measures will merely delay but not prevent the vaccine-mediated impact of diminished Covid-19 morbidity rates in the elderly (or otherwise vulnerable subjects) on the evolution of the virus in younger and healthy subjects. The more younger and healthy age groups will be enrolled in these mass vaccination campaigns, the faster the predominantly circulating Sars-CoV-2 will evolve to more infectious, and ultimately vaccine-resistant variants.


LINK see FAQ 5 for quote

Hoping this guy is wrong but he is staking his reputation and it no one has stepped up for his open call at the WHO to scientifically debate his theory.



none of that means it will prolong the duration of the pandemic. its just talking about vaccines being a false sense of security as the vaccinated can still get covid. vaccinated or not the virus will mutate, we already knew this because the variants existed prior to vaccines.
Posted by AMS
Member since Apr 2016
6537 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

If you can’t give us these based in real data, then I don’t know how you can know that the vaccines aren’t prolonging the “pandemic” unless your argument is there is zero difference between vaccine immunity and natural immunity, which I don’t think anyone other than Fauci is making.



thats not what I said at all. theres really 2 ways you can look at the vaccines they work or they dont. if they do work and reduce infection that would end the pandy faster since there is a smaller reservoir. if the vaccines dont work then there should be no difference in the progress of the pandy. im not even asserting that the vaccine is worthwhile risk:benefit on an individual basis.

quote:

Because this information has not been developed (I’ll be pleasantly shocked if you can answer my questions), people go by anecdotal info and intuition. For some that results in extreme views (that you/others lampoon), but there are orders of magnitude more people like me that are simply skeptical of everything the “experts” have proclaimed about the virus/vaccines because nearly none of prior proclamations have proven accurate, and this whole shitshow is clearly political AF and a money/power grab of extreme order. Many of us have scientific or engineering backgrounds, so while not MDs or virologists, we can read what is written and get a sense/gist of what seems plausible and what doesn’t.


none of what im talking about has anything to do with power grabs or political shite. and if your science background is decent enough you would understand that in vitro studies can 'prove/suggest' many things that are very incorrect in vitro.

quote:

Anecdotally, it sure seems vaccinated people are getting infected and reinfected at rates higher than those with natural immunity. If this is true, and I’d love to see scientific evidence it’s not, but if it is - it seems to me an argument that the vaccines are prolonging the “pandemic” is reasonable.


although I dont think your anecdote is supported. if that were the case then it would be speeding up the end of the pandemic by covid running through the population faster with more people developing natural immunity. this data is also a moving target considering people can get covid before they get vaccinated etc, natural mutations that have existed that were not measured in the vaccine trials. theres many factors in motion and im not sure the 3 questions you asked
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
15705 posts
Posted on 11/21/21 at 1:30 pm to
Publish this - I’ve lost two friend to the vac - both died of blood clots in their heart 2 days after the second shot. You have to be a fool to get this vax. It’s evil.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram